Whitlock footnotes

15IRS Letter Ruling (TAM) 9751003 (4/28/97); see Lipshultz and Zysik, “Significant Recent Developments in Estate Planning,” 29 The Tax Adviser 546 (August 1998).

16IRS Letter Ruling (TAM) 9944003 (7/2/99).

17IRS Letter Ruling (TAM) 9941013 (7/9/99).

18Est. of Cyril I. Magnin, 184 F3d 1074 (9th Cir.), rev’g and rem’g TC Memo 1996-125.

19Est. of Rose D’Ambrosio, 101 F3d 309 (3d Cir. 1996).

20John M. Wheeler, 116 F3d 749 (5th Cir. 1997).

21Notice 99-36, IRB 1999-26, 3.

22See Rev. Rul. 2000-28, IRB 2000-23, 1157.

23IRS Letter Ruling (TAM) 9938005 (6/7/99).

24See Marian A. Byrum, 408 US 125 (1972) (right to vote stock was not retained interest).

25IRS Letter Ruling 9925027 (3/25/99); see Easton, “Recent Developments in QPRTs and QTIPs,” 31 The Tax Adviser 416 (June 2000).

26IRS Letter Ruling 9922062 (2/26/99).

27IRS Letter Ruling 200001015 (9/30/99).

28Est. of Harriet R. Mellinger, 112 TC 26 (1999).

29Ann. 99-116, IRB 1999-35, 314.

30Est. of Helen Bolton Jameson, TC Memo 1999-43.

31Est. of Sam H. Marmaduke, TC Memo 1999-342.

32Est. of James W. Hendrickson, TC Memo 1999-278.

33Est. of Helen J. Smith, TC Memo 1999-368.

34Est. of Richard R. Simplot, 112 TC 130 (1999).

35Baine P. Kerr, 113 TC No. 30 (1999).

36Est. of Robert L. Snyder, Ct. Fed. Cls., 8/20/99.

37IRS Letter Ruling 9949023 (9/10/99).

38Rev. Rul. 2000-2, IRB 2000-3, 305.

39Center Heights Lumber Co., DC IN, 5/6/99.

40Est. of Frank A. Branson, 113 TC No. 2 (1999).

41Rohn F. Drye, Jr., 120 Sup.Ct. 474 (1999), aff’g 152 F3d 892 (8th Cir. 1998); see Tax Trends, “Sup. Ct.: Valid Disclaimer of Inheritance Under State Law Cannot Avoid Federal Tax Lien,” 31 The Tax Adviser 274 (April 2000).

42Schultz v. Schultz, 591 NW2d 212 (1999).

43IRS Letter Rulings 9931048 (5/12/99), 9931049 (5/12/99) and 200008044 (12/3/99).

44IRS Letter Ruling 200018057 (2/9/00); see Tax Clinic, “IRA-Designated Beneficiary Not Bound by Owner’s Pre-Death Withdrawal Calculations,” p. 610, this issue.