Treatment of Legal Fees Incurred by Individuals— footnotes Editor’s note: Annette Nellen is editor of The Tax Adviser’s Campus to Clients column and a member of the AICPA’s Individual Tax Technical Resource Panel. 1 Sec. 62(c) and Regs. Secs. 1.62-2(c)-(f). 2 Regs. Sec. 1.263(a)-2(c). 3 Woodward, 397 US 572 (1970), and Stark, TC Memo 1999-1. 4 Gilmore, 372 US 39 (1963). 5 McKeague, 12 Cl. Ct. 671, 675 (1987). 6 Boagni, 59 TC 708, 713 (1973). 7 Regs. Secs. 1.212-1(k) and 1.263(a)-2(c). 8 “Where property is acquired by purchase, nothing is more clearly part of the process of acquisition than the establishment of a purchase price.” Woodward, 397 US 572, 579 (1970). 9 Baylin, 30 Fed. Cl. 248 (1993). 10 Jasko, 107 TC 30 (1996). 11 Regs. Sec. 1.212-1(h). 12 Regs. Sec. 1.262-1(b)(7). 13 Murphy, 48 TC 569 (1967). 14 Wang, TC Memo 1998-389, aff’d without pub. op. 35 Fed Appx 643 (9th Cir. 2002). 15 Nadiak, 356 F2d 911 (2d Cir. 1966). 16 Stiebling, 113 F3d 1243 (9th Cir. 1997). 17 Chaplin, TC Memo 2007-58. The court applied common-law rules to determine that the taxpayer was an employee rather than an independent contractor. Thus, the legal fees were deductible from AGI rather than for AGI. 18 Alexander, 72 F3d 938 (1st Cir. 1995). 19 Biehl, 351 F3d 982, 986 (9th Cir. 2003). 20 Reynolds, 296 F3d 607 (7th Cir. 2002). 21 Metzger, 88 TC 834 (1987), aff’d without pub. op. 845 F2d 1013 (3d Cir. 1988); Bent, 835 F2d 67 (3d Cir. 1987). 22 Benci-Woodward, 219 F3d 941 (9th Cir. 2000), cert. den., 531 US 1112 (2001). 23 Banks, 345 F3d 373 (6th Cir. 2003). 24 See Lucas v. Earl, 281 US 111 (1930), and Helvering v. Horst, 311 US 112 (1940). 25 Cotnam, 263 F2d 119 (5th Cir. 1959). 26 Banaitis, 340 F3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2003). The Ninth Circuit reached different results in Benci-Woodward and Banaitis due to differences between California and Oregon laws. 27 Regs. Sec. 1.212-1(k). 28 Leonard, 94 F3d 523 (9th Cir. 1996). But see Baylin, 43 F3d 1451 (Fed. Cir. 1995), and Church, 80 TC 1104 (1983). 29 Gilmore, 372 US 39, 51 (1963). 30 Alexander, 72 F3d 938 (1st Cir. 1995). |