Reporting Employment
Tax Discrepancies Transportation Costs
(Box)
Sec. 404(c) Plan
Participants (Box)
Lesli S. Laffie, J.D.,
LL.M.
From
the IRS
Reporting Employment
Tax Discrepancies
The IRS is
issuing a new schedule to make it easier for taxpayers to
provide information about employment tax discrepancies
created by an acquisition, statutory merger or
consolidation. Rev. Proc. 2004-53 provides guidance on
the new schedule and on filing employment tax returns
after an acquisition.
Schedule
D: An acquisition, merger or consolidation
that creates a discrepancy between the information
reported (1) to the Social Security Administration on
Form W-2 and (2) on Form 941, Employers Quarterly
Federal Tax Return, can be explained on new Form 941,
Schedule D, Report of Discrepancies Caused by
Acquisitions, Statutory Mergers, or Consolidations, even
if the employer e-filed its employment tax return.
However, not every employer experiencing a merger or
acquisition should file Schedule D; it should be filed
only for:
- Statutory
mergers and consolidations.
- Acquisitions
meeting the requirements for
predecessor-successor status.
New
procedure: Rev. Proc. 2004-53 has three
purposes:
- To explain
both the standard procedure and an alternate for
preparing and filing Forms W-2; 941; W-4,
Employees Withholding Allowance
Certificate; and W-5, Earned Income Credit
Advance Payment Certificate, in certain
acquisitions. It supersedes Rev. Proc. 96-90, and
applies when an employer (successor) acquires
substantially all the property used in (1)
another employers (predecessors)
trade or business or (2) a separate unit of a
predecessors trade or business, and, in
connection with or immediately thereafter (but
during the same calendar year), the successor
employs individuals who immediately before the
acquisition were employed in the
predecessors trade or business.
- To provide
guidance on Schedule D.
- To amplify
Rev. Rul. 62-60, which describes the information
a resultant corporation (now known as a surviving
corporation) should provide on an absorbed
corporation (now known as an acquired
corporation) after a statutory merger or
consolidation. Completion of Schedule D to report
discrepancies will also provide notice of a
statutory merger or consolidation under Rev. Rul.
62-60.
Effective
date: Schedule D should be used to explain
discrepancies for acquisitions, statutory mergers or
consolidations effective after 2004. The IRS says that,
in many cases, Schedule D information will enable it to
resolve discrepancies without contacting taxpayers. The
Service is also eliminating a barrier to electronic
filing, by removing the requirement for paper filing of
Form 941.
What Is a
Metropolitan Area for Transportation
Cost Purposes?
by Vinay S. Navani, CPA, Principal, Wilkin &
Guttenplan, P.C., East Brunswick, NJWhile commuting
expenses are generally nondeductible under Sec.
262, transportation costs to a work location are
deductible, according to Rev. Rul. 99-7, if the
taxpayer travels between his or her residence
and:
- A
temporary work location outside the
metropolitan area where the taxpayer
lives and normally works.
- A
temporary work location, regardless of
distance, if the taxpayer has one or more
work locations away from his or her
residence.
- Another
work location, if the taxpayers
residence is his or her principal place
of business under Sec. 280A(c)(1)(A).
In Corey
L. Wheir, TC Summ. Op. 2004-117, the
Tax Court considered, for the first time, the
definition of metropolitan area, to
determine if the taxpayers transportation
expenses were deductible.
Facts
The
taxpayer was a union boilermaker living and
working in Wisconsin Rapids, WI. He received
assignments from the union office and was
dispatched on jobs ranging from one day to
several months, located throughout Wisconsin. He
did not report to any union office, had no other
fixed place of business and was not allowed,
under union rules, to reject any assignments.
Most of the assignments did not require overnight
travel.
The
taxpayer deducted travel expenses for jobs
greater than 35 miles from his home. The IRS
disallowed all the claimed travel expenses; it
contended that, because Wisconsin Rapids is not a
metropolitan area as defined by the U.S. Census
Bureau, the entire state was the taxpayers
normal work area in applying Rev. Rul. 99-7.
Tax
Courts Decision
The
court disagreed with the Services
interpretation, holding that Rev. Rul. 99-7 does
not define metropolitan area or refer
to another official standard (i.e., the Census
Bureau definition). By following the IRSs
interpretation, the court reasoned that taxpayers
living outside such areas would be at a
disadvantage vis--vis taxpayers living within
metropolitan boundaries. As a result, it
sustained the taxpayers position of
deducting transportation expenses for assignments
more than 35 miles from his home.
Conclusion
Tax
advisers need to be aware that Wheir, a
Tax Court Summary Opinion, cannot be cited as
authority. However, it does provide some
practical guidance for deductions claimed under
Rev. Rul. 99-7 when the taxpayers
metropolitan area may not be clear.
|
Sec. 404(c)
Plan Participant Education and Communication
by Lisa C. Germano, CPA, J.D., Actuarial Benefits
& Design Company, Midlothian, VA, and Member,
AICPA Tax Executive Committee, and Lisa A.
Winton, MBA, MST, AICPA Technical ManagerDefinition
A Sec.
404(c) plan is an individual account plan
(generally a profit-sharing, Sec. 401(k) or
money-purchase plan) that provides a participant
the opportunity to choose from a broad range of
investment alternatives that includes at least
three diversified investment categories with
materially different risk and return
characteristics.
Not only
must participants be given the opportunity to
exercise investment control, they must
affirmatively take advantage of and actually
exercise it. A participant must have a reasonable
period in which to give investment instructions
(written or otherwise, with an opportunity for a
written confirmation) to an identified fiduciary
or designated agent. The plan fiduciary must
ensure that participants are providedor can
obtain on requestbasic information about
investment choices.
If a
participant exercises control over his or her
account, then (1) the participant is not a plan
fiduciary because of such exercise; and (2) plan
fiduciaries do not bear the risk of investment
loss due to the investment choice a participant
makes.
Requirements
The Sec.
404(c) regulations are complex when analyzed, yet
simple when taken at face value. The heart of the
requirements are access to appropriate
information, ability to access the account to
effect a change and adequate education.
Frequency
of Investment Instructions
For
participants to have exercised proper control
over account investments, they must be able to
transfer among investment alternatives at
intervals reasonably commensurate with an
investments anticipated volatility. The
regulations premise is to allow investment
transfers in such a way as to minimize losses.
Volatile
Investment Rule
At least
one of the core investment alternatives must
allow participants to give investment
instructions as frequently as they can for any
volatile investment fund. The core
investment need only allow transfers into the
alternative investment.
Broad
Range of Investment Alternatives
When
taken together, the investment options must allow
each participant to diversify investment in the
self-directed portion of his or her individual
account. Fiduciaries have a duty to provide for
the investment of idle plan assets.
Self-Directed
Brokerage Accounts
Such
accounts raise issues when the fiduciary intends
for the investment choice structure to satisfy
the Sec. 404(c) rules. While it is possible for
these accounts to be part of a Sec. 404(c) plan,
caution is advised and certain plan procedures
should be followed.
Other
Issues
Many
issues arise in the day-to-day operation of a
plan that affect the protection offered by the
Department of Labor regulations under Sec.
404(c). It is important to implement
transactional protection, procedures, policies
and communication.
|
|