Employee Benefits & Pensions: Current Developments (Part I) — footnotes

1Rev. Rul. 2001-51, IRB 2001-45, 427.

2Robert J. Matz v. Household Int’l Tax Reduction Investment Plan, ND IL, 9/8/00, aff’d, 227 F3d 971 (7th Cir. 2000); cert. granted, rev’d and rem’d, 533 US 925 (2001); on remand, rev’g and rem’g ND IL, 265 F3d 572 (7th Cir. 2001), cert. den. 

3Warren Weil v. Retirement Plan Admin. Committee, 933 F2d 106 (2d Cir. 1991).

4Mead Corp., 533 US 218 (2001). 

5IRS Letter Ruling 200214031 (12/13/01).

6IRS Letter Ruling 200212035 (12/28/01).

7IRS Letter Rulings 9839030 and 9839031 (both dated 6/29/98).

8IRS Letter Ruling 200213032 (1/02/02).

9SCA 200148051 (9/20/01).

10Ann. 99-104, 1999-2 CB 555.

11See Secs. 408(d) and 408A(3)(B); Regs. Sec. 1.408A-4, Q&A-2, -3 and -8 and 1.408A-5, Q&A-1 and -6(b).

12See Sec. 7803(c). 

13See Sec. 6213 and GCM 39019 (8/3/83).

14IRS Letter Ruling 200208029 (11/26/01).

15Rev. Rul. 78-406, 1978-2 CB 157.

16Chrysler Corp., TC Memo 2001-244.

17See Don Gilmore, 372 US 39 (1963).

18IRS Letter Ruling 200210065 (12/11/01).