Elinsky
footnotes
1Notice 2000-3, IRB 2000-4,
413, modifying Notice 98-52, 1998-2 CB 634.
2Notice 98-52, note 1 supra.
3Rev. Rul. 2000-27, IRB
2000-21, 1033.
4IRS Letter Ruling 200030031
(5/1/00).
5IRS Letter
Ruling 200009047 (9/17/97).
6See Puckett, "Form
5500Out with the Old, in with the New," 31 The
Tax Adviser 332 (May 2000).
7TD 8880 (4/2/00).
8Notice 2000-32, IRB
2000-26, 1274, modifying Notice 99-5, IRB 1999-3, 10.
9Notice 99-5, note 8 supra.
10TD 8891
(7/18/00).
11Rev. Rul. 2000-36, IRB
2000-31, 140.
12Rev. Proc. 99-45, IRB
1999-49, 603, modifying Rev. Proc. 95-51, 1995-2 CB 431.
13Rev. Proc. 95-51, note 12
supra.
14Rev. Rul. 2000-8, IRB
2000-7, 617, amplifying and superseding Rev. Rul. 98-30,
IRB 1998-24, 8.
15Rev. Rul.
2000-33, IRB 2000-33, 142.
16Rev. Rul. 2000-35, IRB
2000-31, 138.
17Announcement 2000-60, IRB
2000-31, 149.
18Rev. Rul. 98-30, note 14
supra; see Arsenault, "The Risks and Rewards of Sec.
401(k) Plan Negative Elections," 30 The Tax
Adviser 250 (April 1999).
19TD 8873 (2/7/00).
20Rev.
Proc. 2000-27, IRB 2000-26, 1272. "GUST" refers
to, in the aggregate, the changes in plan qualification
requirements made by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(GATT), the Uniformed Services Employment and
Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA), the SBJPA, the
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (TRA '97) and the IRSRRA '98.
21Sklar, Greenstein &
Scheer, P.C., 113 TC 135 (1999).
22Rev. Rul. 86-142, 1986-2
CB 61.
23Neil M. Baizer, 204
F3d 1231 (9th Cir. 2000), aff'g TC Memo 1998-36.
243 CFR 275 (1978).
25Cage
v. General Motors Defined Benefit Salaried Plan, 98
FSupp2d 803 (ED MI, 1999).
26Kenneth Seales v. The
Amoco Corp., 82 FSupp2d 1312 (DC AL, 2000).
27Rev. Rul. 99-51, IRB
1999-50, 652.
28IRS Letter Ruling 9938052
(7/2/99).
29Rev. Proc. 99-4, IRB
1999-1, 115.
30IRS Letter Ruling 9940946
(9/15/99).
31IRS Letter Ruling
200014043 (1/12/00).
|