| Home Online Publications Online Issues TTA Home Table of Contents Clinic Index State & Local Taxes-1 | ![]() |
Digital Transmissions Produce Significant Tax Savings Before delivery of items sold over the Internet, taxpayers should consider whether they can transfer these products electronically. In many states, software, books, music, videos and almost anything that lends itself to digitization might not be subject to sales tax if the transfer is properly structured. With the Internet came the creation of a new medium of transacting business and delivering productsthe digital transmission of data. Products that just a few years ago required a physical transfer from seller to purchaser now may be sold and acquired with the click of a mouse, bypassing traditional methods of delivery (and possibly taxation, as well). States generally impose sales and use tax (the single largest source of state and local revenue in the U.S.) on retailers for the privilege of making in-state sales of tangible personal property. They do not treat tangible personal property sold over the Internet any differently than the same property sold in a store, over the phone or through a catalog. When the property is something other than tangible (such as digital software), the sale may escape traditional definitions of taxable property in some states' tax laws. Many states have not directly addressed the taxability of digital transmissions. Those that have are inconsistent in applying tax distinctions, and have tried to categorize electronic commerce transactions under existing definitions.
Tangible vs. Intangible In some jurisdictions, software or other information downloadable electronically is taxable; in others, only software deliverable via a traditional tangible medium is subject to sales tax. For example, California does not tax electronic delivery of software, provided the transfer does not involve the exchange of tangible personal property. In other words, a seller cannot give a purchaser a master disc or other tangible materials. Similarly, Pennsylvania does not subject on-line sales of digitized products to sales and use tax, because of its determination that digital products do not possess tangible qualities. In New York, there is no sales and use tax on interactive educational resources that retailers sell via the Internet. While there is tax on tangible custom computer artwork (such as on a disc), such artwork is considered intangible property and not subject to tax when a retailer transmits it electronically. On the other hand, the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services imposes sales and use tax on Internet sales of digitized products manufactured for general retail, if the benefit of the product is received in-state. Similarly, in New York and Illinois, sales of pre-written, or "canned," software are subject to sales and use tax as taxable sales of tangible personal property. For both states, the method of software delivery does not change taxability.
Structuring Transfers Some states provide guidance on requirements for a sales tax exemption for digital transfers. For example, California provides an exemption sometimes called a "load and leave" arrangement, by which a seller installs software on a purchaser's computer and leaves nothing other than the loaded software on the buyer's server. California places several restrictions on the qualification, such as a provision that no physical property remain with the purchaser. Sellers must carefully consider all aspects of transactions to properly structure them within California's regulatory guidelines. While exemptions may apply to digital transfers of significant software purchases (such as enterprise resource planning software and source codes), a company should pursue a detailed review of relevant state authority to ensure proper compliance with state requirements.
Tax Savings Potential In general, state treatment of digital transfers falls into three categories. While some states might deem the transaction as either taxable or exempt, other states might not have even addressed the issue. Thus, the differing treatments of electronic transfers create both confusion and potential planning opportunities for providers of digitized products and services. A review of digital transfers relating to the specifics of particular types of businesses may minimize sales tax exposure and result in significant tax savings, provided the proper methodologies are implemented to ensure compliance with state laws. From Mai N. Bui, J.D., and Michael V. Santoro, J.D., Los Angeles, CA |