| Home · Magazines and Newsletters · The Tax Adviser · Online Issues · Table of Contents · Clinic Index · Corporations & Shareholders | ![]() |
New Regs. Clarify Stock
Distribution Requirement in Acquisitive Partly
to clarify the confusion caused by Letter Ruling 200551018 as to acquisitive Overview In general, Secs. 368(a)(1)(D)
and 354(b) provide non-recognition treatment for acquisitions meeting the
following criteria:
Historically, the Service and courts have not required the actual issuance and distribution of stock and/or securities if the same person(s) own all the stock of the transferor and transferee. New Rules Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.368-2T(l) clarifies situations in which
the stock and/or securities distribution requirement is satisfied despite
the fact that no stock or securities are actually issued or distributed.
Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.368-2T(l)(2) provides that the distribution requirement
will be deemed met if the same person(s) own(s) (directly or indirectly) all
the stock of the transferor and transferee in identical proportions (whether
or not stock is actually issued and distributed).
Identical ownership: In evaluating identical ownership, Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.368-2T(l)(2)(ii) provides that the Sec. 318(a)(1) attribution rules apply, with minor modifications. Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.368-2T(l)(2)(iii) provides that the distribution requirements will be deemed met if there is a de minimis variation in shareholder identity or proportionality of ownership in both corporations. While “de minimis” is not defined, Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.368-2T(l)(3), Example (4), indicates that a 1% variation in common stock ownership is de minimis. Preferred stock meeting the definition of Sec. 1504(a)(4) is not taken into account. Effective Date The temporary regulations are effective for transactions occurring after March 18, 2007 and can be applied sooner if all parties to the transaction agree. They do not apply to transactions occurring under a written agreement binding before Dec. 19, 2006. Note: On Feb. 28, 2007, temporary and proposed regulations under
Sec. 368 were From Catherine M. Fox-Simpson, CPA, MST, Dallas, TX |