Home Online Publications Online Issues TTA Home Table of Contents Clinic Index Accounting Methods & Periods Search Feedback

Accounting Methods & Periods

15-Year Recovery Period for Certain Qualified Leasehold Improvements

Prior to the AJCA, if a leasehold improvement constituted an addition or improvement to nonresidential real property already placed in service, the improvement was depreciated using the straight-line method over 39 years, under Sec. 168.

 

New Law

ACJA Section 211 requires that qualified leasehold improvements be depreciated using the straight-line method and a 15-year recovery period. A qualified leasehold improvement is defined as any improvement to an interior portion of a building that is nonresidential real property, provided:

1. The improvement is made under a lease either by the lessee (or sublessee), or by the lessor, of that portion of the building to be occupied exclusively by the lessee (or sublessee);

2. The improvement is placed in service more than three years after the date the building was first placed in service; and

3. The improvement is not attributable to the enlargement of the building, any elevator or escalator, any structural component benefiting a common area or the internal structural framework of the building.

In addition, if a lessor makes a qualified leasehold improvement, such improvement does not qualify as qualified leasehold improvement property to any subsequent owner of the improvement, unless acquired by reason of death or certain nonrecognition property transfers (e.g., Secs. 351, 721, etc.).

 

Effective Date

The provision is effective for property placed in service after Oct. 22, 2004 and before 2006.

 

Implications

This is a very favorable provision and should be an incentive for lessees and/or lessors to perform improvements. The provision effectively reduces the recovery period for qualified leasehold improvements by more than half. The Service and Treasury issued regulations defining qualified leasehold improvements under the bonus depreciation rules that should be used in determining qualification for this depreciation provision.

Taxpayers should also be aware that this is a straight-line method, unlike other modified accelerated cost recovery system 15-year recovery property, which is generally eligible for the 150% declining-balance method.

From Jane Rohrs, Washington, DC


Back
2005 AICPA