| Home Online Publications Online Issues TTA Home Table of Contents Clinic Index S Corporations | |
State Taxation of Professional Athletes and Entertainers
States and localities often target nonresident professional athletes and entertainers to pay income taxes. Such celebrities are often highly paid individuals whose whereabouts can easily be tracked from readily available performance schedules and advertisements. Moreover, tax collections from such taxpayers are an efficient revenue generator. For example, in fiscal 2000, California and Wisconsin collected $94 million and over $11 million, respectively, from nonresident athletes; see Walker, A Closer Look at the Jock Tax, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (7/9/02), at www.jsonline.com/sports/brew/allstar/jul02/57648.asp. Why should such taxpayers and their tax advisers be concerned? The Tax Foundation, a Washington-based, nonpartisan, nonprofit group that monitors fiscal policy, reported that the taxation of nonresident athletes is poorly targeted, arbitrary and burdensome; see Hoffman, State and Local Income Taxation of Nonresident Athletes Spreads to Other Professions, at www.taxfoundation.org/sr123.pdf. Such individuals may have to file returns in over 38 states, not including localities. The sourcing rules for such income may vary significantly by jurisdiction and may depend, in part, on the type of income earned, the states particular sourcing method and the reporting-entity relationship (i.e., employee, independent contractor, etc.). Moreover, athletes and entertainers may even be subject to double taxation, as explained below. Often, athletes and entertainers are treated differently from other highly paid workers, such as investment bankers, corporate executives and attorneys. Are these and other more moderately paid individuals next on the states radar? Following are the general rules, pitfalls and planning recommendations in this area.
General Rules Typically, a resident individual is subject to state income tax on his or her worldwide income; a nonresident individual is subject to state income tax on his or her income derived from or connected with sources within the taxing state. In addition, a resident taxpayer is generally allowed a resident tax credit, subject to certain limits, for taxes paid to the nonresident jurisdiction. If the taxpayers resident state does not impose an income tax (e.g., Florida and Texas), no resident credit is available. Historically, sports-team athletes would file income tax returns in two jurisdictions: (1) their resident state and (2) the state where home games were played. They did not file income tax returns in states where away games were played. Entertainers also need to determine the location(s) to source their income (i.e., where a performance occurs). Although many states follow traditional rules, others have revised their laws, regulations, guidance and policy to tax athletes and entertainers under alternative methods. Such methods may be a trap and result in unanticipated tax liability and compliance. Allocation methods: The two most common allocation methods for athletes of professional teams are the (1) duty days method and (2) games played method. The duty days method allocates income based on a ratio, the numerator of which is the number of duty days the taxpayer is present in the state and the denominator of which is the total number of duty days. Duty days are all days the athlete is required to perform services (i.e., from pre-season and training camp through post-season playoffs, including instructional leagues, promotions, appearances, etc.). In comparison, the games played method allocates income based on a ratio of games played in the taxing state to total games played. Certainly, the athletes taxation can differ significantly, depending on the states method of taxation, as well as a particular athletes residence, sport and location of activities. Entertainers: Like athletes, states may also tax entertainers on a duty days or performance days method (i.e., working days within and without the state). Other states may simply tax an entertainer based on the net income derived from a particular performance within the jurisdiction.
Pitfalls Athletes and entertainers who do not file a tax return in a jurisdiction can be assessed tax, interest and penalty for all back years, as there is no statute of limitations (SOL) on assessment if a return has not been filed. In addition, if assessed, a resident credit may not be available if the SOL has expired in the taxpayers resident state (or, as indicated above, if the state does not impose an income tax). Significantly, a resident credit may not be available in certain jurisdictions if the taxpayers entire income was deemed earned within the resident state. For example, in a surprising result, Illinois would not allow baseball star Sammy Sosa, an Illinois resident, a credit for taxes he paid to other jurisdictions for games he played in nonresident states. The Illinois Circuit Court agreed with the Illinois Department of Revenue in finding that the taxpayers income was compensation paid solely in Illinois, because his employer, the Chicago Cubs, was based there. As a result, Sosa was subject to double taxation and paid state income tax on more than 100% of his income; see Sosa v. Bower, IL Cir. Ct., Dkt. No. 02 L 50670 (6/26/03). Sourcing issues: State income tax sourcing issues for athletes may include: 1. Bonuses (for signing, playing or performance); 2. Contract termination payments; and 3. Payments for commercials and endorsements. The state tax sourcing of an entertainers income may become more complex, for example, if the entertainer is (1) an employee of a promoter, organizer or production company; (2) an independent contractor; (3) receiving royalty income; or (4) receiving income for television and radio transmissions.
Planning
From David Schmutter, CPA, J.D., LL.M., and Ari Lazaar, Weiser, LLP, New York, NY (Neither affiliated with Grant Thornton LLP) |
