Post
EGTRRA Analysis and Planningfootnotes
1During President Clinton's
first term, a number of proposals were advanced that
would have effectively increased the estate and gift
taxes. These included a limit on the number of gift tax
annual exclusions, attempts to legislatively overturn D.
Clifford Crummey, 397 F2d 82 (9th Cir. 1968), and
attacks on family limited partnerships, valuation
techniques and other common wealth-transfer tools.
2The Estate Tax Elimination
Act, 106th Cong, 1st Sess.
3The Death Tax Elimination
Act of 2000, 106th Cong., 2d Sess.
4See Study on Reform of
the Estate and Gift Tax System (AICPA,
2001)(hereinafter, "AICPA Study"), at 91 Tax
Notes 307 (4/9/01); see also, "AICPA Study on
Reform of the Estate and Gift Tax System," 32 The
Tax Adviser 334 (May 2001).
5The sunset provision was inserted
into the EGTRRA to protect it from challenge under the
"Byrd rule" (named for its author, Sen. Robert
Byrd (D-WVA)). The purpose of the Byrd rule is to keep
budget act provisions budget-related. Thus, any provision
that has revenue effects outside of the 10-year budget
period is subject to removal from the bill on challenge
by any Senator. The challenge can be overcome only by a
60-vote majority. Because Senate leaders felt that the
EGTRRA's provisions would not be supported by 60 members,
the sunset provision was inserted to avoid violation of
the Byrd rule; see Kaufman, "The Estate and Gift
Tax: Implications of the 2001 Tax Act," 92 Tax
Notes 949 (8/13/01), p. 952.
6The scheduled increase in the
effective exemption amount under the Tax Reform Act of
1997 (to $1 million) will still apply, as will any
inflation-adjusted increases in the generation-skipping
transfer (GST) tax exemption.
7While the maximum estate tax rates
are lowered, the minimum rates applying to taxable
estates effectively increase due to increases in the
effective exemption amount. While in 2001, the smallest
taxable estate faces a marginal tax rate of 37%, by 2004,
the lowest tax rate applicable to a taxable estate will
increase to 45%.
8It has been suggested that the
retention of the gift tax exclusion at $1 million was
necessary to prevent wealthy taxpayers from gifting away
increasingly higher amounts between 2004 and 2010 before
the sunset provisions took effect and returned the
effective exemption amount to $1 million in 2011; see,
e.g., Pennell, "Summary of the Estate Planning
Provisions of the EGTRRA of 2001," 17 Audio
Estate Planner, No. 4 (Summer 2001).
9See, e.g., Gardner, Chapter 21,
GST Compliance: Preparing the 706 and 709: Allocating the
Exemption (24th Annual Notre Dame Tax and Estate
Planning Institute, 1998).
10These provisions were enacted
largely due to the efforts and suggestions of a
multigroup task force that included members of the AICPA,
the Tax and the Real Property, Probate and Trust Law
Sections of the American Bar Association, the American
Bankers Association and the American College of Trust and
Estate Counsel, and were explicitly endorsed in the AICPA
Study, note 4 supra.
11Notice 2001-50, IRB 2001-34, 189.
The EGTRRA has been heralded as the
death of the estate tax.
12See Harmon, "The Estate Tax:
Repeal or Reform?," 91 Tax Notes 2072
(6/18/01).
13See Aucutt, "Conference
Proceedings of the ABA Section of Taxation Meeting"
(Chicago, IL, 8/24/01).
14In fact, this is already happening
in some states. For example, under New York Tax Law
Section 952(c), the estate tax paid is tied to the amount
allowed as a Federal credit in 1998. Unless the New York
legislature reduces the amount of the Federal estate tax
payable to the state, New York taxpayers will likely pay
more total estate tax in 20022004 than under previous
law.
15For example, Sheppard, "Debt
in Contemplation of Death," 91 Tax Notes 1655
(6/4/01), describes a scheme (attributed to Prof.
Mitchell Gans, Hofstra University School of Law) in which
a taxpayer has an asset worth $100 million with a zero
basis. The taxpayer borrows $100 million against the
asset and bequeaths the cash to his child. The encumbered
asset (with little or no net value) is then bequeathed to
a tax-exempt entity, eliminating the built-in gain.
|