| Home Online Publications Online Issues TTA Home Table of Contents Personal Financial Planning | ![]() |
Fiduciary
Responsibility and
Editor:
Authors:
Robert
L. Gray, CPA, Ph.D.
For
further information about this column, contact Mr. Minker
at mminker@mahoneycohen.com, or Mr. Primoff at
wprimoff@nnaplan.com.
Fiduciary responsibility is a special and important
concept for CPAs in tax and financial planning practices, one that is twofold:
fiduciary obligations to clients, which go well beyond acting as an executor or
trustee, and the significant and profitable role that CPAs
can play in helping clients who serve as estate executors or trustees, to
fulfill their fiduciary duties.
Fiduciary
Duty Defined
Fiduciary
duty is imposed on a person who accepts being placed in a position of great
trust by another individual or entity and, as a result, is required to fulfill
important legal responsibilities in exercising that trust. While the concept of
fiduciary duty is commonly associated with executors and trustees, it is much
broader.
An entire
body of law, treatises and related journal articles define this topic.
Fiduciary duty may be imposed by statute or by the courts. It may be created
(sometimes unintentionally) by a person holding out and acting in a manner that
causes another individual to place special trust in that person. Often (as with
CPAs or attorneys), persons held to a fiduciary standard have professional or
other special expertise that a client lacks. A fiduciary is often entrusted
with another’s assets or is providing trusted advice in relation to those
assets.
In
describing the responsibility and trust elements that a person with fiduciary
duty owes to another individual, judicial decisions contain such terms and
phrases as: due care, loyalty, fidelity, good faith, candor, diligence, full
disclosure of conflicts, professional skill and best efforts. Fiduciaries are
required to perform professional or other services with all of the expertise,
loyalty and due care that they possess.
Dan L. Goldwasser, a prominent attorney and one of the foremost
experts in CPA legal matters, explains that the principal duties of a fiduciary
are:
The failure
to meet these responsibilities properly can subject CPAs or others held to a
fiduciary standard to a lawsuit for breach of fiduciary duty. Fiduciary
Duty and CPAs
CPAs in
public practice are generally held by the courts to be fiduciaries, when they
are acting in their frequent capacity as clients’ trusted advisers. Both tax
advisory services (as distinguished from pure tax return preparation) and financial
planning are generally seen as trusted adviser services. Investment advisers
are separately considered to be fiduciaries, as are attorneys. A retirement
plan administrator under ERISA is an example of a statutory fiduciary.
Volunteers on association governing bodies, such as the AICPA or state CPA
societies, have a fiduciary responsibility to association members.
Observation:
CPAs who are investment advisers will often be seen
as having a fiduciary duty related to both of these roles. Attest services are
not fiduciary services, because a CPA’s loyalty is to the profession’s ethical and
professional standards related to the attest engagement, rather than to the
client. However, many nonattest advisory services
performed for attest clients can lead to fiduciary relationships. It is
difficult to draw a bright line in this area.
Courts do
not generally hold CPAs performing nonattest
financial statement services to a fiduciary standard (though sometimes they
may). Conversely, the courts are likely (but not invariably) to hold that a CPA
offering business or financial advice does have a fiduciary relationship with
the client. The greater the disparity in the knowledge of the subject matter
between the client and the CPA, the greater the chance that the courts will
find that a fiduciary relationship exists.
The scope of
CPAs’ fiduciary relationship remains an unchartered
area, especially for those who serve their clients in multiple capacities.
Thus, it is possible that a CPA may be deemed a fiduciary with respect to a
client to whom he or she is offering trusted business, tax or investment
advice, but would not likely be held a fiduciary with respect to financial
statement services that he or she is also providing. Where to draw the line
remains a gray area.
CPAs can
sometimes control whether they will be fiduciaries, in relation to specific
client engagements. Other times, they can do little or nothing to prevent being
deemed a fiduciary. However, the steps that CPAs should take to avoid fiduciary
responsibility, such as limiting clients’ reliance on certain services, may also impair the strength of trusted CPA-client
relationships. Because this trust element is one of the major value-added
characteristics that can set CPAs apart from competitors, CPA choices in this
area should be carefully considered (for an excellent article on minimizing
fiduciary duty, see Goldwasser, “Avoiding Fiduciary
Liability,” CPA Journal, July 2002,
available at www.cpaj.com). Estate and
Trust Investments
While the
broad fiduciary duties of care and loyalty are conceptually well understood,
until recently there has been little specific guidance on the fiduciary process
that should be followed when managing or outsourcing the management of
investment assets.
Fiduciary
duty in relation to investments can arise for both CPAs and their clients who
serve as executors or trustees. It can also arise for CPAs serving as
investment advisers. To provide the
necessary guidance, the Foundation for Fiduciary Studies, working with the
AICPA, developed a practice standard titled, Prudent Investment Practices. A companion book, which covers the
standard in greater detail, is The New
Fiduciary Standard: The 27 Prudent Investment Practices for Financial Advisers,
Trustees, and Plan Sponsors, by Tim Hatton, published in cooperation with
the Foundation for Fiduciary Studies (Bloomberg Press, 2005) (both are
available as a discounted set at
www.ordering1.us/bloombergbooks/product.php?pid=232). The Foundation’s work has received substantial favorable
publicity, and the nature of the AICPA’s role in it
may require CPAs to justify major departures from this fiduciary standard. Fiduciary
Support Services for Clients
Many CPA
firm clients who become executors or trustees have little understanding of either
their fiduciary roles, or the process and related actions required to fulfill
their fiduciary responsibilities. Attorneys are needed to prepare and execute
the necessary legal filings, but CPAs often have more experience and ability to
help clients manage the process of being a fiduciary.
This process
can involve such issues as:
Observation: Before agreeing to provide fiduciary support services, it is important for CPAs to have a clear understanding as to who will pay for them. In some jurisdictions, the probate courts closely monitor estate and trust expenses, and may disallow or substantially reduce payments to CPAs and other parties from the trust or estate, if they are not specifically provided for in the governing instruments or expressly permitted by law. Instead, the court may expect such expenses to be paid by fiduciaries themselves, from their executor or trustee commissions. However, provisions in a will or trust can be drafted to specifically permit the fiduciary to retain the necessary professionals and pay their reasonable fees out of estate or trust assets. It is wise for CPAs to regularly educate clients on the benefits of having them review any instrument that names a client as a trustee or executor, before it is finalized. CPAs often improve such documents by making recommendations on taxation and the operation of the trust or estate. For example, they can recommend that an executor or trustee be expressly permitted to pay CPAs and other professionals retained to assist him or her, from estate or trust assets. Once clarifying this payment issue, CPAs providing fiduciary support services generally find them to be a very rewarding extension of traditional CPA tax services, both in terms of profitability and strengthening client relationships. |