Home Online Publications Online Issues TTA Home Table of Contents News Notes Search Feedback

NewsNotes


Lesli S. Laffie, J.D., LL.M.


Expatriate Tax Mutual Fund Regs. JCT on Enron Retirement Plan Rules Foreign Bank Account Reporting

   

Tax Policy

Expatriate Tax

The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) released a report, Review of the Present-Law Tax and Immigration Treatment of Relinquishment of Citizenship and Termination of Long-Term Residency (JCS-2-03), which reviews the adequacy of current tax law on expatriate and former resident income.

Since 1966, the alternative tax regime (ATR) has been the principal mechanism by which the U.S. government has retained tax jurisdiction over expatriated U.S. citizens and former long-term residents. The ATR taxes a U.S. citizens U.S.-source income at normal tax rates for 10 years following expatriation or termination of residency, if the principal purpose was tax avoidance.

Under the ATR regime, the presumption that tax avoidance is the principal reason for a revocation of citizenship or termination of residency arises if the citizens U.S. tax liability averaged $100,000 annually for the five years preceding revocation or if, on the revocation date, his or her net worth is at least $500,000.

The taxpayer may request an IRS ruling to determine if the principal reason for expatriation or termination is tax avoidance. A citizen must also provide the IRS with tax information on the date of revocation, to aid in tracking the taxpayer, or face a penalty of the greater of $1,000 or 5% of the tax liability imposed under the ATR for the year in question. However, according to the JCT report, the IRS has yet to impose any penalties.

The report indicates that the ATR regime has been a total failure, due in large part to poor IRS enforcement and the fact that the IRS has no procedure for monitoring expatriates for the 10-year period after expatriation or for assessing and collecting income tax from tax-motivated expatriates. In fact, the IRS could not show that any tax has been collected from any expatriate, because it does not track such information. In addition, the IRS has no procedures for working with governments of nations where expatriates reside, to compel compliance.

The JCT report makes several recommendations, including:

1. Use the monetary standards as bright-line tests and eliminate the ruling process.

2. Maintain the Sec. 877 exceptions without the need for a ruling.

3 Create a tax-based system for determining the expatriation date.

4. Require expatriates and former residents to file annual returns, even if no tax is due, to assist the IRS in monitoring their activities during the 10-year window.

AICPA Recommends Changes
to Mutual Fund Regs.

by Eileen Sherr, Technical Manager

The AICPA Tax Divisions International Taxation Technical Resource Panel recently submitted a comment letter to the IRS, recommending that it amend Sec. 853 regulations to conform to Code changes made more than 20 years ago. A clean-up amendment would simplify reporting requirements for mutual fund shareholders by eliminating unnecessary information, thus enhancing shareholder compliance.

A significant number of mutual funds invest assets abroad and can pass through a foreign tax credit to their shareholders. The typical international mutual fund has investments in 15 to 35 different countries, but pays only an insignificant amount of foreign taxes per share. The AICPA proposal would reduce fund administrators time and expense (often passed on to shareholders) of providing superfluous tax information.

The AICPA comments included proposed amendments to the Sec. 853 regulations and recommended that Form 1116, Foreign Tax Credit (Individual, Estate, or Trust), indicate that distributions from regulated investment companies are exempt from per-country reporting. The comments also suggest changing the due date for certain shareholder notices to 60 days, to conform to 1986 law changes.

The proposal provides a no-cost opportunity to improve shareholder tax compliance, enhance investor relations and reduce fund expenses. No revenue will be lost, because the changes do not affect the computation of taxes, either directly or indirectly; rather, they simply eliminate reporting voluminous, unused information, thereby reducing fund expenses for compiling information, drafting, printing and mailing, and answering phone calls from perplexed shareholders. Finally, the proposal eliminates the confusion caused by the extensive table required to report per-country information. The AICPAs comment letter is available at www.cpa2biz.com/ResourceCenters/Tax/International/ FTC_rptg_mutual_funds.htm.

 

JCTs Enron Reports

The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) issued a 2,700-page, 3-volume Report Of Investigation Of Enron Corporation and Related Entities Regarding Federal Tax and Compensation Issues, and Policy Recommendations (JCS-3-03). Volume I contains the report; volumes II and II contain various appendices.

The JCT also issued Written Testimony of the Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation on the Report of Investigation of Enron Corporation and Related Entities Regarding Federal Tax and Compensation Issues, and Policy Recommendations (JCX-10-03), which (1) analyzes in detail various tax-related transactions Enron used and (2) recommends tax policy changes for corporate, partnership and pension tax law. The documents are available at www.house.gov/jct.

AICPA Comments on Simplifying Employer-Provided Retirement Plan Rules

by Lisa A. Winton, Technical Manager

The AICPA has recently submitted comments on the Presidents FY2004 budget proposal to simplify the employer-provided retirement plan rules. It applauds this effort in general, and particularly commends the efforts to consolidate the variety of retirement plan options into a single benefits structure. However, the AICPA is concerned that these simplification efforts may have unintentional, broadly applicable consequences.

The proposed changes do not encourage small employers to offer retirement savings plans to their employees, but may encourage those that currently offer retirement plans to terminate them. This would thwart the Administrations goal of promoting more retirement savings.

The Administrations proposal would create three new retirement savings accounts: (1) Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs); (2) Lifetime Savings Accounts (LSAs); and (3) Employer Retirement Savings Accounts (ERSAs). RSAs and LSAs would allow individuals to invest up to $7,500 in 2003 (adjusted annually) and permit account gains to grow tax free. LSA withdrawals could be made tax free, at any time and for any purpose. RSA withdrawals would only be tax free if the holder was at least age 58. ERSAs are modeled after Sec. 401(k) plans and would replace all employer plans (including Sec. 401(k) plans, simplified employee pensions and savings incentive match plans for employees (SIMPLE) IRAs).

The full set of comments may be found at www.cpa2biz.com/ResourceCenters/Tax/budget_critique.htm. For further assistance, contact Lisa Winton at (202) 434-9234 or lwinton@aicpa.org.

Reporting Foreign Bank Account Information

by Eileen Sherr, Technical Manager

The AICPA reminds tax advisers to ask clients about the existence of foreign bank accounts and to disclose such information on Form 1040, Schedule B, Part III, Question 7. Tax advisers should also consider notifying clients of their responsibility to file Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, by June 30, 2003.
This form is required to be filed by U.S. citizens and residents who have a financial interest in or signature or other authority over any financial accounts (including bank, securities or other types of financial accounts in a foreign country), if the aggregate value of such accounts exceeded $10,000 during 2002.

In recent testimony, Treasury clarified that addressing the lack of disclosure of foreign financial accounts has become a priority. The IRSs Offshore Voluntary Compliance Initiative allows partial amnesty until April 15, 2003 (see Tax Practice & Procedures, Amnesty for Offshore Tax Evaders, this issue.) Congress is likely to add new, easier-to-impose penalties this year for not filing Form TD F 90-22.1.
Treasury can impose on any person who willfully violates this reporting requirement a civil penalty, in the amount of the transaction or the value of the account, up to a $100,000 maximum (the minimum penalty is $25,000). In addition, any person who willfully violates this reporting requirement is subject to a criminal penaltya fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment for up to five years, or both; if the violation is part of a pattern of illegal activity, the maximum fine increases to $500,000 and the maximum length of imprisonment increases to 10 years.

 


Back
2003 AICPA