NewsNotes
Lesli S. Laffie, J.D.,
LL.M.
Expatriate Tax Mutual Fund Regs.
JCT on Enron Retirement Plan Rules
Foreign Bank Account Reporting
Tax Policy
Expatriate Tax
The Joint Committee on
Taxation (JCT) released a report, Review of the Present-Law Tax and
Immigration Treatment of Relinquishment of Citizenship and Termination
of Long-Term Residency (JCS-2-03), which reviews the adequacy of
current tax law on expatriate and former resident income.
Since 1966, the alternative tax regime (ATR) has
been the principal mechanism by which the U.S. government has retained
tax jurisdiction over expatriated U.S. citizens and former long-term
residents. The ATR taxes a U.S. citizens U.S.-source income at normal
tax rates for 10 years following expatriation or termination of
residency, if the principal purpose was tax avoidance.
Under the ATR regime, the presumption that tax
avoidance is the principal reason for a revocation of citizenship or
termination of residency arises if the citizens U.S. tax liability
averaged $100,000 annually for the five years preceding revocation or
if, on the revocation date, his or her net worth is at least $500,000.
The taxpayer may request an IRS ruling to determine
if the principal reason for expatriation or termination is tax
avoidance. A citizen must also provide the IRS with tax information on
the date of revocation, to aid in tracking the taxpayer, or face a
penalty of the greater of $1,000 or 5% of the tax liability imposed
under the ATR for the year in question. However, according to the JCT
report, the IRS has yet to impose any penalties.
The report indicates that the ATR regime has been a
total failure, due in large part to poor IRS enforcement and the fact
that the IRS has no procedure for monitoring expatriates for the 10-year
period after expatriation or for assessing and collecting income tax
from tax-motivated expatriates. In fact, the IRS could not show that any
tax has been collected from any expatriate, because it does not track
such information. In addition, the IRS has no procedures for working
with governments of nations where expatriates reside, to compel
compliance.
The JCT report makes several recommendations,
including:
1. Use the monetary
standards as bright-line tests and eliminate the ruling process.
2. Maintain the Sec. 877
exceptions without the need for a ruling.
3 Create a tax-based system
for determining the expatriation date.
4. Require expatriates and
former residents to file annual returns, even if no tax is due, to
assist the IRS in monitoring their activities during the 10-year window.
|
AICPA Recommends Changes
to Mutual Fund Regs.
by Eileen Sherr, Technical Manager
The AICPA Tax Divisions International Taxation Technical Resource
Panel recently submitted a comment letter to the IRS, recommending
that it amend Sec. 853 regulations to conform to Code changes made
more than 20 years ago. A clean-up amendment would simplify
reporting requirements for mutual fund shareholders by eliminating
unnecessary information, thus enhancing shareholder compliance.
A significant number
of mutual funds invest assets abroad and can pass through a
foreign tax credit to their shareholders. The typical
international mutual fund has investments in 15 to 35 different
countries, but pays only an insignificant amount of foreign taxes
per share. The AICPA proposal would reduce fund administrators
time and expense (often passed on to shareholders) of providing
superfluous tax information.
The AICPA comments
included proposed amendments to the Sec. 853 regulations and
recommended that Form 1116, Foreign Tax Credit (Individual,
Estate, or Trust), indicate that distributions from regulated
investment companies are exempt from per-country reporting. The
comments also suggest changing the due date for certain
shareholder notices to 60 days, to conform to 1986 law changes.
The proposal provides
a no-cost opportunity to improve shareholder tax compliance,
enhance investor relations and reduce fund expenses. No revenue
will be lost, because the changes do not affect the computation of
taxes, either directly or indirectly; rather, they simply
eliminate reporting voluminous, unused information, thereby
reducing fund expenses for compiling information, drafting,
printing and mailing, and answering phone calls from perplexed
shareholders. Finally, the proposal eliminates the confusion
caused by the extensive table required to report per-country
information. The AICPAs comment letter is available at
www.cpa2biz.com/ResourceCenters/Tax/International/
FTC_rptg_mutual_funds.htm. |
JCTs Enron Reports
The Joint Committee on
Taxation (JCT) issued a 2,700-page, 3-volume Report Of Investigation
Of Enron Corporation and Related Entities Regarding Federal Tax and
Compensation Issues, and Policy Recommendations (JCS-3-03). Volume I
contains the report; volumes II and II contain various appendices.
The JCT also
issued Written Testimony of the Staff of the Joint Committee on
Taxation on the Report of Investigation of Enron Corporation and Related
Entities Regarding Federal Tax and Compensation Issues, and Policy
Recommendations (JCX-10-03), which (1) analyzes in detail various
tax-related transactions Enron used and (2) recommends tax policy
changes for corporate, partnership and pension tax law. The documents
are available at
www.house.gov/jct.
|
AICPA Comments on Simplifying
Employer-Provided Retirement Plan Rules
by Lisa A. Winton, Technical Manager
The AICPA has recently submitted comments on the Presidents
FY2004 budget proposal to simplify the employer-provided
retirement plan rules. It applauds this effort in general, and
particularly commends the efforts to consolidate the variety of
retirement plan options into a single benefits structure. However,
the AICPA is concerned that these simplification efforts may have
unintentional, broadly applicable consequences.
The proposed changes
do not encourage small employers to offer retirement savings plans
to their employees, but may encourage those that currently offer
retirement plans to terminate them. This would thwart the
Administrations goal of promoting more retirement savings.
The Administrations
proposal would create three new retirement savings accounts: (1)
Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs); (2) Lifetime Savings Accounts
(LSAs); and (3) Employer Retirement Savings Accounts (ERSAs). RSAs
and LSAs would allow individuals to invest up to $7,500 in 2003
(adjusted annually) and permit account gains to grow tax free. LSA
withdrawals could be made tax free, at any time and for any
purpose. RSA withdrawals would only be tax free if the holder was
at least age 58. ERSAs are modeled after Sec. 401(k) plans and
would replace all employer plans (including Sec. 401(k) plans,
simplified employee pensions and savings incentive match plans for
employees (SIMPLE) IRAs).
The full set of
comments may be found at
www.cpa2biz.com/ResourceCenters/Tax/budget_critique.htm. For
further assistance, contact Lisa Winton at (202) 434-9234 or
lwinton@aicpa.org. |
|
Reporting Foreign Bank Account
Information
by Eileen Sherr, Technical Manager
The AICPA reminds tax advisers to ask clients about the existence
of foreign bank accounts and to disclose such information on Form
1040, Schedule B, Part III, Question 7. Tax advisers should also
consider notifying clients of their responsibility to file Form TD
F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, by June
30, 2003.
This form is required to be filed by U.S. citizens and residents
who have a financial interest in or signature or other authority
over any financial accounts (including bank, securities or other
types of financial accounts in a foreign country), if the
aggregate value of such accounts exceeded $10,000 during 2002.
In recent testimony,
Treasury clarified that addressing the lack of disclosure of
foreign financial accounts has become a priority. The IRSs
Offshore Voluntary Compliance Initiative allows partial amnesty
until April 15, 2003 (see Tax Practice & Procedures, Amnesty for
Offshore Tax Evaders, this issue.) Congress is likely to
add new, easier-to-impose penalties this year for not filing Form
TD F 90-22.1.
Treasury can impose on any person who willfully violates this
reporting requirement a civil penalty, in the amount of the
transaction or the value of the account, up to a $100,000 maximum
(the minimum penalty is $25,000). In addition, any person who
willfully violates this reporting requirement is subject to a
criminal penaltya fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment
for up to five years, or both; if the violation is part of a
pattern of illegal activity, the maximum fine increases to
$500,000 and the maximum length of imprisonment increases to 10
years. |
|