| EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY |
WITH THE
ADVENT OF SARBANES-OXLEY, CPAs ARE LIKELY
to receive more invitations to serve on
the audit committees of corporate boards
of directors. Before accepting these
offers, accountants should make sure they
are ready for the time commitment and
other responsibilities that come along
with them. MANY CPAs
WILL BE ASKED TO SERVE AS THE AUDIT
committees financial expert. This
individual should have an understanding
of GAAP and financial statements,
experience preparing, auditing, analyzing
or evaluating statements that show a
level of complexity similar to the
companys and an understanding of
internal controls, financial reporting
procedures and audit committee functions.
INDUSTRY EXPERTISE IS
AN IMPORTANT QUALIFICATION for
audit committee service. For certain
specialized industries CPAs may need to
devote extra time to gain a working
understanding of the business and its
competitors.
SERVING ON AN AUDIT
COMMITTEE INVOLVES a significant
time commitment, including preparing for
meetings as well as attending them.
Preparation time depends on the
responsibilities in the audit
committees charter and the
resources available to help it do its
job.
BEFORE MAKING A FINAL
DECISION TO JOIN an audit
committee, CPAs should be sure to read
the sections of Sarbanes-Oxley pertaining
to audit committees as well as the
companys audit committee charter,
speak to current and former committee
members and evaluate their own
independence from the company and its
management.
|
| STEPHEN A. SCARPATI, CPA, CLU,
ChFC, is a senior managing partner at
180 Management in New York City. He
heads the firms audit committee
advisory service. His e-mail address is stephen.scarpati@worldnet.att.net. |
orporate America is only beginning to feel the
impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Not
surprisingly, one consequence of this legislation
is that CPAs, particularly those who are retired
from public practice or those in industry, are
often sought after to serve on boards of
directors of both public and private companies.
It is particularly critical for the long-term
economic confidence of the nation that American
businesses attract and retain talented
individuals to serve on their boards audit
committees. Now that the SEC has issued its
definition of audit committee financial
expert, even more companies are seeking
CPAs as board members.
Serving on an audit committee
can be professionally rewarding. For many
accountants, it provides an opportunity to
contribute a lifetime of experience in a
challenging new business environment. Many CPAs
find the intellectual interaction with other
corporate leaders to be a pleasant addition to
their careers. This experience, however, is not
universal. For some, the benefits do not justify
the personal commitment, media spotlight and
legal liability that potentially accompany audit
committee service. A few have resigned their
positions while others simply do not accept
offers to serve. This article outlines some key
factors and practical issues CPAs contemplating
service on an audit committee should consider
before joining. In addition, Six Points to Ponder
When Invited to Join an Audit Committee offers guidance from CPAs who
serve on corporate boards and their insights into
the decision of whether to join a board and its
audit committee.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
SEC rules
implementing section 407 of Sarbanes-Oxley
require a company to disclose whether it has at
least one financial expert serving on
its audit committee and, if so, the experts
name and whether he or she is independent of
management. A company that does not have such an
expert on its audit committee must disclose this
fact and explain why.
| It makes sense that corporate
America would look to CPAs to satisfy
this new requirement because the SEC
defines a financial expert as someone
with An understanding of GAAP and
financial statements.
The ability to assess the
general application of these principles
in connection with accounting for
estimates, accruals and reserves.
Experience preparing,
auditing, analyzing or evaluating
financial statements that present a
breadth and level of complexity of
accounting issues that are generally
comparable with the breadth and
complexity of issues the companys
financial statements might reasonably
raise or experience actively supervising
one or more persons engaged in such
activities.
|
| Directors
and Ethics Some 81% of
companies have conducted ethics
and compliance training for their
employees.
Only 27%have held
any such training sessions for
their boards of directors.
About 55% of the
executives surveyed say their
directors are not engaged enough
in major ethical issues involving
the company.
Source: Conference
Board survey of ethics, human
resources and legal officers, www.conference-board.org.
|
|
An understanding of internal controls and
financial reporting procedures.
An understanding of audit
committee functions.
Under SEC rules, a person must
have acquired these attributes by any one or more
of the following means:
Education and experience as
a principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer, controller, public accountant
or auditor.
Experience actively
supervising one of the above or someone
performing similar functions.
Experience overseeing or
assessing the performance of companies or public
accountants regarding the preparation, auditing
or evaluation of financial statements.
Other relevant experience.
CPAs in both public practice
and industry typically have these attributes and
qualify as audit committee financial experts.
However, CPAs need to consider a number of other
issues and factors when contemplating an offer to
serve on an audit committee.
INDUSTRY
EXPERTISE
By design,
board members frequently are drawn from a
wide spectrum of industries and
professions. This diversity adds valuable
perspective when assessing corporate
strategy, overseeing management and
evaluating operating performance. New
members without the requisite industry
background must devote extra time and
effort to gain a working understanding of
that business. Certain industries,
however, have higher degrees of
specialization, uniqueness or regulation
than others, and the learning
curve could be considerably longer.
For more specialized
industries, audit committee members in
particular often need to devote extra
time to understanding the financial
implications of a companys
circumstances. Take, for example, the
insurance industry. All insurance company
audit committee members need to
understand issues such as
Statutory accounting. Prescribed
by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners, this method of accounting
differs significantly from GAAP.
State regulation. These
rules are unique to each of the 50
states. Most insurance companies
typically do business in multiple states.
Actuarial considerations.
The methods and assumptions
actuaries use for pricing and reserve
valuation criteria.
TIME COMMITMENT
For many
CPAs, the amount of time required to
effectively serve is the primary
consideration in deciding whether to
accept an audit committee assignment.
Three major factorsthe committee
charter, meeting preparation and
available resourcesinfluence the
time commitment.
|
| Audit
Committee/Director Resources
The
AICPA has created an audit
committee matching system
(ACMS) for members who are
interested in serving on the
audit committee or board of
directors of a public, private,
not-for-profit or public-interest
entity. AICPA members can
register with the ACMS at www.aicpa.org.
Organizations looking for audit
committee members will be able to
visit the ACMS and search for
candidates. Both parties are
responsible for their own due
diligence.
The
AICPA is also creating an audit
committee tool kit, including
forms and checklists, to help
make a committee actionable. The
kit will be available late in the
third quarter or early in the
fourth quarter of 2003. Its
availability will be announced
through The CPA Letter and
the AICPA Weekly Update
and other means. The kit will be
supported by a Web site within www.aicpa.org called
the Center for Audit Committee
Effectiveness. All tools will be
downloadable from the Web site,
and users are encouraged to
tailor them to their own needs.
In early
2004 the AICPA also expects to
launch an audit committee
competency model within the AICPA
Competency Self-Assessment Tool.
The model will allow audit
committee members, and those in
the organization that work
closely with them, to assess
their skillsan important
step in understanding the
committees effectiveness.
|
|
Audit committee
charter. This document sets out the
groups responsibilities, authority and
specific duties. Typically, an audit committee
oversees and monitors a companys financial
accounting and reporting process, its internal
controls system and the external audit process.
Its quite possible
members may have other responsibilities as well.
The biggest variable in establishing the extent
of audit committee oversight is whether other
board committees exist to handle related
financial matters. For example many boards of
directors have a finance committee, which
exercises general oversight over the
companys financial programs. Certain
financial services institutions also may have a
committee to supervise investment policies and
procedures. The absence of such committees may
add to the audit committees workload and
increase the time commitment of its members.
Preparation. An audit
committee typically meets between four and eight
times a year. The actual time attending these
meetings usually is dwarfed by the time a member
must spend to prepare for them. A common
boardroom debate revolves around the volume and
level of detail of information and materials
management provides to committee members prior to
meetings. Not long ago a six-member audit
committee at one large company debated the issue,
with three members wanting to reduce the level of
detail from management and the other three asking
for more. While this might seem unusual, it
highlights the fact that a review of financial
statements, independent accountant
communications, internal audit reports,
management reports and correspondence all take
place before the meeting and require considerable
preparation time. Conscientious members arrive at
audit committee meetings prepared to address key
issues and to ask the right questions.
Resources. Section 301
of Sarbanes-Oxley specifically addresses the
issue of audit committee resources. It says,
Each audit committee shall have the
authority to engage independent counsel or other
advisors, as it determines necessary to carry out
its duties. That section also says,
Each issuer shall provide appropriate
funding to the audit committee.
Not every audit committee has
the time, skills and experience to handle every
problem that comes its way, particularly if the
company faces unusual, difficult or contentious
issues. Increasingly, proactive audit committees
are augmenting their collective member expertise
by:
Obtaining training and
education on current issues affecting the
company.
Engaging their own industry and
financial experts.
Hiring legal counsel for the
committee.
As committees strive to assess
risk, determine the adequacy of controls and
understand key business drivers, they often seek
outside advice to ensure they are asking the
right questions. Not only does this provide
important incremental expertise, it also eases
the burden on individual committee members who
might otherwise have to devote extra time and
effort on their own.
LEADERSHIP
Many CPAs will be
asked to serve as the audit committee financial
expert. By virtue of their financial skills,
acumen, training and background, CPAs are in an
excellent position to grasp key issues quickly
and make leadership contributions to audit
committees. This also could include serving as
committee chair. In this role, CPAs would have
additional responsibilities, the most significant
being setting the groups agenda.
Establishing the committee
agenda requires considerable judgment. After
consulting with senior management, other audit
committee members, board members, the internal
audit director, the independent audit partner and
others, the chairperson must cull through myriad
events, business situations, reports, projects
and governance issues that potentially could be
brought before the committee, weed out those that
waste valuable committee time, home in on
high-risk areas and rank topics worthy of
committee consideration. CPAs contemplating audit
committee membership should keep in mind that
serving in a leadership role, including as
chairperson of the committee, would not be
unusual.
LIABILITY
ISSUES
Audit committee members have a fiduciary
duty to the company and to its
shareholders. Accordingly, legal
liability is a major concern for CPAs
considering joining a board of directors.
While directors can ease those concerns
somewhat by securing adequate directors
& officers insurance coverage as well
as by retaining legal counsel and other
experts to advise them, the liability is
a reality prospective directors must
weigh before accepting an invitation to
join a board and its audit committee.
When researching the company, CPAs not
only have to review the entitys
financial statements and products but
also investigate its corporate
reputation, management practices and
business ethics. In
its final rule on audit committee
disclosure, the SEC noted that in
adopting the new rules and amendments,
we do not intend to subject
companies or their directors to increased
exposure to liability under the federal
securities laws, or to create new
standards for directors to fulfill their
duties under state corporation law.
The SEC went on to say that it did not
believe the disclosure requirements would
result in increased liability exposure or
create new standards. It remains to be
seen whether one of the long-term
consequences of Sarbanes-Oxley is to
increase or decrease litigation.
Nevertheless, from the viewpoint of an
individual director, legal liability
isand will remaina major
boardroom concern.
|
 |
PRACTICAL
TIPS TO REMEMBER |
CPAs
considering joining the audit
committee of a corporate board of
directors should make sure they
understand the industry the
company operates in, particularly
if it is one with special
considerations, such as the
insurance industry.
Be aware
that audit committee service can
involve a time commitment that
goes beyond the hours spent
attending meetings. This includes
reading reports and other
materials prepared by management,
reviewing financial statements,
internal audit reports and
correspondence from the
companys external auditors.
Before
accepting an offer to join an
audit committee, CPAs should make
sure they and their firm are
independent of the company and
its management. The requirements
in Sarbanes-Oxley make it
particularly important to check
for any real or apparent
conflicts of interest.
Prospective
committee members should research
the company thoroughly before
accepting an invitation to serve
as a director. This includes
reading prior annual reports,
talking to current and past board
members, speaking with employees
and interviewing the
companys external auditors.
|
|
THE FINAL DECISION
Before deciding
whether to accept an offer to join an audit
committee, CPAs should take these steps:
Learn the law. Understand
the required roles, responsibilities and duties.
Read the sections of Sarbanes-Oxley that pertain
to audit committees. The AICPA Web site, www.aicpa.org, is an excellent resource.
Research the
industry. Get to know the industry
in which the company operates. (A good place to
start is to obtain material from industry
associations and review the Web sites of the
companys major competitors.) Use this
information to determine the extent to which your
skills and experience can be helpful and to
figure out how much effort you will need to
devote to learning the business.
Read the
companys audit committee charter. Understand
the committees assigned breadth of
responsibilities and whether there are
incremental duties over and above those of
traditional audit matters.
Speak to
current and former committee members. Ask
them how long they have served, their background,
how much time they devote to committee service,
their perspective on the key issues affecting the
company and what additional resources are
available to the committee.
Estimate your
time commitment. Make your own
estimate of how much time you will need to devote
to carry out the duties to your satisfaction and
that of the company. Make sure the requirements
fit comfortably with your own personal situation.
Evaluate your
independence. Are you, your firm
and your other clients independent of the company
whose audit committee you want to join? CPAs
should check carefully to make sure they have no
conflicts of interest before joining the board.
Armed with this information,
CPAs can make an informed decision on whether
they want to become part of the new vanguard in
corporate governance Sarbanes-Oxley has created. 
Six Points to Ponder
When Invited
to Join an Audit Committee
Audit committee membership can be an
awesome responsibility. This is
particularly true since the advent of
Sarbanes-Oxley. Here are some suggestions
from board members that CPAs should
evaluate before accepting a
companys invitation to join its
audit committee.
1
Make sure you
research the company well. CPAs
should go far beyond the companys
annual reports and other financial data,
according to accountants who sit on audit
committees today. With cases like Enron,
experts say the importance of firsthand,
in-depth knowledge of the companys
culture cant be overrated. Is
management straightforward and
forthright? asks CPA Michael
Bernstein of Geller & Co. in New York
City. Does it set a positive tone
in carrying out its
responsibilities? Bernstein, who
manages Gellers finance and
accounting outsourcing group, recently
accepted an appointment as audit
committee chairman of a $50 million drug
company, Bradley Pharmaceuticals, in
Fairfield, New Jersey.
If staffers hesitate to speak up when
queried, Bernstein says a red light
should go off. I suspect a problem
if I have difficulty getting candid
responses, he says. Bernstein also
suggests CPAs interview the prospective
companys audit firm at length.
Among the questions Bernstein asked
Bradleys auditor, Grant Thornton,
was its opinion of the capabilities of
the corporations top financial
officers and staff and whether it knew of
any reason why he shouldnt join the
boards audit committee.
2 Dont be afraid
to raise negative issues. CPAs
should talk to outside professionals,
directors and lawyers to see whether
there are any reasons why they
shouldnt join the audit committee.
Dont be afraid to explore negative
issues, although you may want to
experiment with your choice of words,
since even sensitive areas can be
approached with diplomatic language.
Candidates should do a thorough search to
reveal any litigation issues the company
is facing. This information is available
by contacting the companys legal
counsel or its independent auditors, who
should have a confirmation from
management as of the latest audit date
about any legal issues the company faces.
Edwin H. Ruzinsky, CPA, urges accountants
to question the motivation of other
directors for joining (or leaving) the
board, examine their backgrounds, analyze
where they fit in, and their integrity
and quality. If that attitude had
prevailed in the past in corporate
America, Ruzinsky says, we
wouldnt be in this state.
Its fair game for the prospective
director not only to respond to questions
at any interview session but also to ask
them of the companys existing
directors.
CPA Robert Waxman says prospective
board members should listen for pat
phrases when employees respond to
questions. If everything is
centered on Mr. Big, you may
have a virtual dictatorship. Are there
cronies, cousins or other related parties
on the board? Do some dominate and others
cower? One board member told Waxman
during an interview, If youre
going to challenge the president, they
dont want you on the board.
Waxman says he had to ask himself,
Does anyone ever challenge
the president? Perhaps more
important, he had to ask himself whether
he wanted to serve on that companys
board of directors. In this case, the
answer was no; Waxman didnt join
the companys board.
3 Familiarize yourself
with the companys industry. Despite
45 years in accounting (15 in positions
of financial responsibility in the
publishing industry and almost 30 years
in public practice), Ruzinsky stuck to
the fields he was most familiar
withmedicine and publishingin
choosing the three boards he agreed to
sit on after he retired from Deloitte
& Touche in 1996. Ruzinsky says to be
fully committed to all, he wouldnt
agree to sit on more than four at one
time.
In addition to two not-for-profit
groups (which dont currently come
under Sarbanes-Oxley), Ruzinsky sits on
the board of Media Sciences International
Inc., a public company that manufactures
consumables for color workgroup printers
and is traded on the American Stock
Exchange. As past president of the New
Jersey state board of accountancy,
Ruzinsky feels confident enough to be the
sole member of Media Sciences audit
committee who meets the Sarbanes-Oxley
requirements for a financial expert.
Ruzinsky cautions that prospective
directors can never be too careful in
checking out a company. Despite
previously serving as a consultant to
Dowden Health Media, a small private
medical publisher, Ruzinsky still met
with Dowdens CEO at least four or
five times before taking on the
chairmanship of its audit committee.
4 Examine the
companys directors & officers
(D&O) insurance. Gerry
S. Weidema, CPA, says she felt a higher
degree of comfort in weighing the risk of
sitting on a bank board, as opposed to a
nonbank public company, since banks are
subject to a higher level of scrutiny,
coming under the watchful eye of bank
regulators and the Comptroller of the
Currency. Yet, she still considered the
liability protection offered by the
banks D&O insurance a vital
area of concern before deciding to serve
as a director.
Weidema says prospective directors
should study a variety of factors that go
beyond whether the board is properly
insured, including a companys
internal policies. She recently traveled
to New York City for a seminar for audit
committee members conducted by New York
Universitys Directors Institute at
the New York Stock Exchange. Weidema says
she found the trip worthwhile because of
the case histories and panel discussions
the seminar included. I learned the
most important thing a director can do is
to keep probing and asking
questions, she says. If you
dont understand something, ask,
dont assume. That word should be
out of your vocabulary. That advice
really stood out.
She notes that at Banknorth, a
regional bank in Portland, Maine where
she is a director, no one is ever
made to feel stupid. Its my job to
ask questions. If management doesnt
have the answers, it gets them for me.
The company has a terrific internal audit
department that follows up and gets back
to us quickly.
5 Make sure you are up
to the job. CPAs who are
considering accepting offers of corporate
directorships should have
Both an accounting and
a finance background.
The energy to execute
the responsibilities.
The ability to deal
with the heightened risk of knowing the
SEC and the public hold all board
members
especially those on the audit
committeeto a higher standard of
conduct.
The tenacity to
confront senior management and directors
on difficult issues.
Time is a big factor that many novices
underestimate. Weidema is cofounder and
partner in Weidema & Lavin, a
two-person accounting firm in Hampton,
New Hampshire, that specializes in tax
services for small businesses. She became
Banknorths first female audit
committee chairperson in April and
estimates the demand on her
timewithout meetingsat a
minimum of 5 to 10 hours a month. In
addition, the committee meets six to
eight times a year for about three to
four hours, not including her travel time
to the companys Maine headquarters.
Weidema had served as a nonvoting ad
hoc member of the audit committees of
several banks that were predecessors to
the $26 billion Banknorth. As a result,
she says, she was very
comfortable about joining
Banknorths audit committee when it
extended the invitation to her.
6 Evaluate the
downsideand the opportunities. While
Ralph Ward of boardroominsider.com and
author of Saving the Corporate Board says
there arent yet any statistics
available on the number of CPAs serving
on audit committees, most experts agree
that large accounting firms do not
actively offer their partners for audit
committee seats. Even where the
board position is with a nonaudit client,
you want your partners to spend 100% of
their time on firm matters, says
Robert Waxman, founding partner of
Corporate Finance Advisory in New York
City and chairman of the New York State
society of CPAs global accounting
and auditing committee. Plus, Waxman
adds, there are bound to be
conflicts of interest with the firm. And
why have your partners be subject to
possible litigation?
Waxman expects that, since section 301
of Sarbanes-Oxley now provides for the
funding of outside advisers, more audit
committees will engage experienced CPAs
to offer advice on financial accounting
and audit matters. Also, notes Waxman,
NPO audit committees are expressing an
interest in complying with several
Sarbanes-Oxley requirements, and some
expect pressure on state regulators to
require certain NPOs to comply with some
Sarbanes-Oxley-like requirements. Already
sitting on one NPOs board and
anothers audit committee, Waxman
says he has begun to actively seek
election as a director of a public
company. With experience in a CPA
practice focusing on investment banking,
mergers and acquisitions, accounting for
derivatives and hedging, SEC filings and
compliance and foreign GAAP, Waxman
believes he is ready to serve on an audit
committee.
Maureen Nevin Duffy is a
freelance business writer in New Jersey.
She is the editor and publisher of the Corporate
Governance Fund Report, www.cgfreport.com,
and the newly launched CG Rate
Monitor.
|
|