| EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY |
AS A RESULT OF THE CSX
DECISION, SOME COMPANIES may be
due refunds of Social Security, Medicare
and unemployment taxes they had made on
severance payments to separated employees
following a layoff or termination. The
court ruled such amounts are supplemental
unemployment compensation benefits
(SUCBs) and thus are not wages subject to
payroll taxes. FOR A COMPANY TO BE ELIGIBLE,
IT MUST HAVE PAID severance
benefits to employees under an
established reduction-in-force plan.
Since the right to amend payroll tax
returns under IRC section 6511 is limited
to three years, CPAs should act quickly
to help clients and employers collect the
money due them.
CPAs SHOULD REVIEW COMPANY
PAYROLL RECORDS to determine the
amount of potential SUCBs. Assuming the
amount is enough to justify the cost of
the refund process, accountants should
make the necessary computations, assemble
the needed documentation and file the
required amended payroll tax returns.
COMPANIES NEED TO DECIDE
WHETHER THEY WILL APPLY for the
employees portion of the tax
overpayment. Without help from their
former employer, most terminated workers
will have an almost impossible task of
getting refunds on their own. The IRS
requires companies to gain written
authorization from employees to request
refunds on their behalf.
AFTER COMPANIES RECEIVE THEIR
REFUNDS, they should place the
funds in escrow to give the IRS time to
audit the amended returns. This includes
the monies due to employees. Failure to
do so could result in significant
penalties for the company if the IRS asks
for its money back.
|
| DOUGLAS LETSCH, CPA, is a
consultant on corporate finance and tax
strategies in Bloomington, Indiana. He
also is an adjunct professor at Walden
University in Minneapolis, where he is
pursuing his PhD in finance. His e-mail
address is dlets001@waldenu.edu. |
or years the IRS has insisted companies collect
and pay Social Security, Medicare and
unemployment taxes on all severance payments they
made to former employees after a layoff or
termination. About 13 years ago, CSX Corp.
challenged this established practice and IRS
interpretations. The company had been company had
been withholding and paying the employee and
employers shares of employment taxes on
several types of severance payments. Then it had
filed amended returns and had requested refunds.
The IRS disallowed the claims so CSX took the
agency to court.
It was not an
easy task and it took CSX many years, but on
April 1, 2002, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims
issued its opinion in CSX Corp., 52 Fed.
Cl. 208 (2002). It held that payments a company
makes to involuntarily terminated employees under
a reduction-in-force plan are supplemental
unemployment compensation benefits (SUCBs) and
thus not wages for purposes of Social
Security, Medicare and unemployment taxes.
The statutory
time now has passed and the IRS no longer can
appeal the decision. It remains silent instead of
issuing an action on decision (AOD) indicating
what direction its acquiescence in the case will
take. The IRS national media relations office
would not comment on CSX or any future agency
action. The IRS, however, has issued some
guidance in Supplemental Circular E,
demonstrating its intent to follow parts of CSX.
This article explains how CPAs can help their
employers and clients get refunds of previously
paid employment taxes.
WHAT
HAPPENED?
The
federal claims court held that under IRC
section 3402(o)(2)(A), certain of
CSXs severance payments were in
fact supplemental unemployment
compensation. SUCBs are amounts an
employer pays to an employee under a plan
to which the employer is a party,
because of an employees involuntary
separation from employment (whether or
not such separation is temporary),
resulting directly from a reduction in
force, the discontinuance of a plant or
operation, or other similar conditions,
but only to the extent such benefits are
includible in the employees gross
income.The
CSX case has many facets. In
fact, the company did not win everything
it wanted. However, the bottom line is if
a company pays severance benefits (not
including paid vacation or sick time) to
former employees under a
reduction-in-force plan (contract,
employee handbook or other agreed-upon
company action contemplating a reduction
in force), those payments generally
qualify as SUCBs and are not subject to
Social Security, Medicare and
unemployment taxes. Lump sum and annuity
type payments also may qualify. If the
company requires the former employees to
perform future services or to be on
call, those payments would not
qualify as SUCBs.
|
More
Severance in Employees
Pockets
Employers
initiated 1,699 mass layoffs in
May 2003. Each action involved at
least 50 employees for a total of
nearly 174,000 workers. The CSX
court decision that certain
payments a company makes to
terminated employees arent
wages means such workers will get
to keep more of their severance
pay.
Source: Bureau of
Labor Statistics, http://stats.bls.gov.
|
|
ACT QUICKLY
With every passing
moment a company could be losing money. Since IRC
section 6511 limits the right to amend payroll
tax returns to three years, CPAs will find that
sitting on the fence waiting for IRS
clarification of its position only will hinder
refund possibilities. I successfully filed
amended returns on behalf of several clients that
received refunds of overpaid Social Security and
Medicare payments on severance payments
considered SUCBs. This suggests other companies
can take similar action.
CPAs should help employers or
clients that have had substantial employee
terminations and layoffs consider how CSX
affects those payments and whether the company is
eligible to file amended returns. By filing such
returns the company gives itself a protective
claim on overpaid FICA and FUTA taxes that also
stops the amended-return time clock.
Filing amended returns
isnt as simple as it might first seem. Even
CPAs who have been preparing payroll tax returns
for years should exercise extreme caution. Here
are some guidelines accountants can follow for
their clients or employer.
Perform an initial review of the
clients or employers payroll records
to determine the amount of potential SUCBs. If
the amount of SUCBs the company paid over the
last three years, calculated at 7.65% (maximum
employer portion of Social Security and Medicare
taxes), is enough to consider the project, then
the CPA should undertake further analysis.
Search for all terminations over a
four-year period beginning in 1999 and determine
the amount of SUCBs the company paid after
termination and during the three-year statutory
period. This extended period means a company
could have SUCBs on one separated employee in two
or more different years. Since many companies pay
severance as an annuity, CPAs must check to see
whether the company made any payments within the
statute of limitations that it may have agreed to
earlier.
Document that severance payments the
company made were in fact SUCBs. This usually
involves a human resources (HR) audit and may
entail a review of each persons payroll
records and the corporate payroll and benefit
policies. While HR does this audit, the finance
and IT departments need to gather data and
compute actual differences in Social Security and
Medicare wages and taxes. Here are some
additional questions CPAs need to ask:
Did the
company pay SUCBs after the separated
employee reached the maximum Social Security
wage base for that year? If so, the Social
Security tax rate would not apply. Medicare,
however, would. Remember that the Social
Security rate changes from year to year.
How much of
the severance is actually qualified according
to new IRS guidelines and CSX?
Did the
company pay SUCBs in more than one calendar
year? In this case the Social Security wage
base would change and a higher rate would
apply in the second year.
The company must decide whether it will
apply for the former employees portion of
the overpayment. Without company help, terminated
employees will have an almost impossible task of
getting their refunds. Most companies ask for
both the employer and employee portions of
overpaid payroll taxes.
If the company decides to help
employees, the IRS requires it to gain written
permission from each one to file amended returns
and seek refunds on their behalf. The employee
also must certify that he or she will not attempt
a refund on his or her own.
When a company contacts separated
employees, its phones will light up with calls
and questions. CPAs should be prepared to spend
at least five minutes on each call. In-house CPAs
should determine whether outsourcing this task
would be a better alternative.
After accumulating the responses of
separated employees, CPAs should recalculate the
employee portions of the refunds, verify all
calculations and then file the amended returns.
For most employers this includes form 941C, with
a corrected 941 for each amended quarter. CPAs
need to be careful to fully justify filing the
amendment; demonstrating proof of SUCBs is
essential. The proper citation along with copies
of plans, contracts and handbooks can make the
difference between success and an IRS review.
All
thats left is to wait for an IRS
response. Refunds generally take up to
six weeks but could stretch much longer
depending on the amounts and number of
employees involved.THE
WAITING PERIOD
Once the IRS issues a refund, the company
should hold the proceeds, giving the IRS
time to audit the amendment. During this
waiting period, CPAs should recommend the
employer place these funds in escrow,
thereby averting legal issues that may
arise from commingling assets. If the
transaction involves employee trust
funds, the Internal Revenue Codes
100% penalty provisions will apply. Thus
CPAs should exercise extreme caution to
avoid this.
The amount of time to
hold funds in escrow is a company
decision since the IRS can still audit
amended returns after processing refunds.
The maximum time a company can hold
refunds before distributing them is three
years. The risk a company faces by making
distributions before three years is that
the IRS will ask for its money back and
may require it to repay funds sent to
past employees. Here is where training
and experience can help; how accurately
CPAs perform the tasks described above is
essential to limiting this waiting
period. The money will earn interest for
whatever time a company decides to hold
the funds.
|
 |
PRACTICAL
TIPS TO REMEMBER |
CPAs should
review employee termination and
layoff records carefully to see
whether payments the company made
to employees qualify as SUCBs. To
qualify, the employer must have
made the payments under a
reduction-in-force plan evidenced
by an employment contract,
employee handbook or other
agreed-upon company action
involving a cut in staff.
Accountants
should be sure to make the
computations carefully. If the
company made payments to a
terminated employee over two tax
years, a different Social
Security tax rate and wage base
may have applied. The same
caution applies with employees
who had earned more than the
maximum wage base. In this case
only Medicare taxes would apply
to earnings over the maximum.
After the
company receives its tax refund,
CPAs should recommend it place
the funds in escrow and not
commingle them with any other
money. This gives the IRS time to
audit the amended payroll tax
returns. Improper handling of
employee trust fund assets can
subject the company to the
Internal Revenue Codes 100%
penalty provisions.
|
|
Once the company has the
refunds in hand and distributes them to past
employees, its time to complete the
remaining paperwork. CPAs will need to prepare a
W-2C and a form 1099-INT for each former employee
showing the change to the original W-2 and the
amount of interest the company received from the
IRS (yes, the IRS will pay interest on overpaid
SUCB taxes), plus the interest from the escrow
accounts. At the appropriate time they must file
the originals with the Social Security
Administration and the IRS and mail copies to
each employee. The companys CPAs should
prepare these forms but hold off on filing them
until the company actually distributes the funds.
If the process goes into another calendar year,
CPAs need to use the correct form 1099-INT for
that year.
ITS
UP TO YOU
The refund process
may be onerous, but as most CPAs know, working
with the IRS generally is not easy. However, a
substantial refund will make the time spent
worthwhile. CPAs should encourage their employers
and clients to explore this opportunity on behalf
of themselves and terminated employeesboth
of whom could benefit from extra dollars in their
pockets. 
|