| The Case for
Private Company GAAP GAAP
has high valuefor the most partsay a
growing number of external users of private
company financial reports, CPAs and other
financial professionals working in or serving
private companies, which represent more than 99%
of the nations incorporated businesses. But
while a recent AICPA-sponsored survey revealed
the prevalence of this opinion, respondents also
said certain GAAP standards arent relevant
and useful enough to help private companies make
management, credit and investment decisions.
Following its research, the task
force recommended that a cooperative effort
including representatives of the key constituents
of private company financial reporting be
undertaken to
Determine who should
establish private company GAAP.
Determine how best to
effect change in the GAAP standard-setting
process to meet the financial reporting needs of
private company constituents.
Develop and oversee the
implementation process on a timely basis.
This article explains why the
topic of private company GAAP is important to the
profession and those it serves, and it provides
details on how current GAAP in some cases
doesand in others does notmeet the
needs of private company financial reporting
constituents.
Survey Methodology
A survey was sponsored by
the Private Company Financial Reporting
Task Force, which the AICPA established
in 2004 to assess views of GAAP among
private company financial reporting
constituents and to see whether the
benefits derived from GAAP financial
statements justify the cost of producing
them. Independent market research firm
the MSR Group of Omaha, Nebraska,
surveyed 3,700 practitioners, private
company owners and managers who prepare
financial statements and external
stakeholders, such as lenders, who use
them. |
A
FRESH START
Drawing on its research, the task
force concluded that a customized version of GAAP
should be developed based on concepts and
accounting that better meet the needs of private
company financial reporting constituents, whose
information requirements are different in certain
instances than those of groups using public
company reports. This can be accomplished, the
report said, by fundamentally changing the
current GAAP standard-setting process in a manner
to be determined by further discussion.
The report also noted that
although private company financial statement
preparers sometimes use GAAP exceptions and other
bases of accounting, such usage is not always
appropriateeven when there is no current
alternativebecause it erodes GAAPs
consistency while failing to truly satisfy
private company financial report users.
INSIDE
VIEWS
To find out more, the JofA
spoke with three of the task forces 15
members (www.aicpa.org/members/div/).
For information on the roles these and other
constituents play in the private company
marketplace, see Who
Doesand NeedsWhat, below.
Who
Doesand NeedsWhat
Practitioners
often perform multiple roles in serving
clients and may be instrumental in
helping prepare or providing assurance on
financial statements. Practitioners also
may act as liaisons between their clients
and external capital providers. Owners and
managers may prepare their
companies financial statements.
Private companies provide financial
statements to external stakeholders to
raise capital, obtain credit, qualify to
bid on contracts and obtain licenses.
External
stakeholders often are the
primary users of private companies
general-purpose financial statements. In
the survey a majority valued GAAP
financial statements, saying they made it
easy to compare company performance over
time, employ standardized terminology and
were useful in making investment or
credit decisions.
|
A
practitioner. James G. Castellano,
CPA, the groups head and a former AICPA
chairman, is the chairman of Rubin, Brown,
Gornstein & Co. LLP in St. Louis, an
accounting and business consulting firm serving
private company clients.
Because Ive worked in
this market segment for many years, I knew it was
time for a fresh assessment of GAAPs value
to constituents of private company financial
reporting, Castellano said. From 1983 to
1985 Castellano chaired the AICPA Technical
Issues Committee, and he served on a FASB task
force on private and small public companies. The
results of FASBs research on the accounting
standards for private companies were published in
1983 (www.aicpa.org/members/div/acctstd/pvtco_fincl_reprt/download/FASSUM81.pdf).
They revealed that fewer than 10% of external
stakeholders saw a need for differences in the
underlying accounting for public and private
companies.
Since then, though,
theres been a fundamental shift in the
thinking of key constituents, Castellano
said. Our current research reflects much
greater support for standards specific to private
companies, as stated by more than 50% of
creditors and investors among those expressing an
opinion. (See External
Stakeholders.)
A private company
manager. Financial consultant Gary
M. Cademartori, CPA, of Tatum Partners LLP, has
more than 20 years experience as chief
financial or operating officer of public
companies. In recent years, while serving as CFO
or strategic financial consultant to six private
companies, he realized GAAP required much
information that those businesses, their lenders,
creditors and investors felt had little value.
Since joining the task force, Ive
learned firsthand how widespread this problem
is, he said. Our research showed that
although respondents valued GAAP highly overall,
theyas my clients dofound certain
GAAP principles insufficiently useful or
relevant. The survey gave us a general sense of
where GAAP meets private company
constituents needs and where it
doesnt.
For example, owners and managers
of private companies of all sizes considered
certain GAAP requirements pertaining to leases,
guarantees, intangibles, variable interest
entities and share-based payments not very
relevant or useful to their businesses, the
survey found. Practitioners from larger firms
were less critical of these requirements than
were those from smaller ones. External
stakeholders opinions varied by their area
of specialization; for instance, lenders and
sureties found GAAPs guarantee requirements
more useful than did investors and venture
capitalists.
Because the 2004 survey was the
first systematic exploration of this topic in
years, its aim was to identify any issues or
problems with GAAP rather than to propose
specific solutionswhich subsequent reform
efforts should address as necessary. The
requirements of a private company version of GAAP
would be determined by the body that assumes the
task of formulating private company
standards, Cademartori said.
Its not useful to speculate what such
standards would require or cost to develop and
implement, although I think its safe to say
most of the cost would relate to initial
standard-setting activities, rather than to their
implementation.
A bank lender. David
L. Maraman, senior vice-president and chief
credit officer of First Indiana Bank in
Indianapolis, said, Taking part in the
research quickly removed my initial uncertainty
about the importance of private company GAAP to
CPAs and especially to their clients. The
question is not whether to act; its how to
accomplish whats absolutely
necessary.
Maraman said future efforts must
be committed to ongoing communication with
private company bankers, investors, sureties,
owners and regulators to ensure any new standards
provide the information each needs. He doubts
that private company standards would undermine
public company GAAP, which he believes will
remain viable and useful because of its critical
role in fostering the uniform, high-quality
corporate financial information essential to a
stable economy.
THE
MARKETPLACE RESPONSE
We on the task force expect
that the creation and implementation of private
company standards will produce financial
statements whose high quality equals that of
their public company counterparts,
Castellano said. Of course some private
companiesfor example, those planning to go
public or to be acquired by an SEC
registrantstill will want to follow public
company GAAP. But private company GAAP will be a
success if it meets the requirements of those who
need it. Thats the bottom line.
NEXT
STEPS
Barry C. Melancon, CPA, AICPA
president and CEO said, The
Institutes board of directors, subject to
the approval of its governing council, supports
the task forces findings and conclusions
and will, with the Financial Accounting Standards
Board and the Financial Accounting Foundation,
explore an appropriate course of action to
improve the usefulness of private company
financial reporting.
More information is available at
the AICPA Private Company Financial Reporting Web
site (www.aicpa.org/members/div/acctstd/pvtco_fincl_reprt/index.htm).
Robert Tie
|