Online Issues > May 2004 > Letters
Letters Clients Entitled to Full
Disclosure If this is not the caseas with foreign outsourcingthe client is entitled to a disclosure of how the information is going to be shared and who is going to do the work. Then there is the long-term damage this kind of activity would have on the profession as the training jobs for entry-level accountants are outsourced. This is another topic that we should explore. Rather than dodge these issues, the AICPA should put them on the table and see what the membership thinks. Paul H. Kositzka, CPA Attest Letters I believe this type of letter attests to a client assertion, which requires I adhere to the standards for an attestation engagement. Notwithstanding adherence to professional standards, the nature of the assertion often is unsupportable and not one I would provide an attestation to. If other CPAs are receiving similar requests, they need to be aware these letters are subject to professional standards. Lawrence Magill, CPA Editors note: You are absolutely correct. If the mortgage broker and lender really want an attest report from a CPA, then the CPA has an obligation to perform that engagement and follow the appropriate professional standards. Lenders usually ask for as much assurance as they can getwithout knowing the cost or consequences. Typically, once the CPA explains what this would entail, they quickly back off. Most of the time, a simple letter from the CPA (with the clients agreement), acknowledging the income reported to the broker or lender is the amount reported to the IRS on the tax return, will suffice. Deficits, Taxes and Savings If past trends continue, the governments efforts to reduce the deficit will lean far more heavily on tax increases than on spending cuts. Already a stealth tax increasethe alternative minimum tax or AMTis ensnaring more and more middle-income Americans. If Congress does nothing to index for inflation the income level subject to the AMT, even more Americans will be forced to pay it, which originally was intended to tax only the wealthiest taxpayers. Unfortunately, even this unintended AMT windfall would not be enough to generate the needed revenue to balance the federal budget. Congress would then have to raise regular income tax rates and close many of the legal loopholes to truly solve the problem. In a worse-case scenario, Americans might lose many tax-advantaged savings incentivesIRAs, 401(k)sand face higher tax rates. I believe it is part of our responsibility as CPAs to encourage clients to make better use of the tax-advantaged savings and investment tools allowable under current tax law. Only by saving and investing, rather than spending, will ordinary Americans be prepared to face the tough times that appear to lie ahead. J. Peter Doyle, CPA/PFS, CFP
|
|||