Online Issues > March 2005 > Golden Business Ideas
BY STANLEY ZAROWIN Overcome the
Seduction of Consensus But that bit of wisdom contains a flaw so serious it can destroy a business. As weve seen lately, passive directors who fail to provide proper oversight can let a company commit criminal, or at least unethical, acts. Consensus, in and of itself, is not bad. It becomes bad only when agreement is reached by people who think support is going with the flow or teamwork means never challenging the judgment of the majority or the boss. Questioning the majority or, even worse, an authority, is difficult and can be dangerous to ones career. Those who buck conventional wisdom often are labeled skeptics or, worse yet, troublemakers. Weve all heard this corporate slogan: We must pull together to achieve our common goal. The message thats implied is: Since dissent is negative thinking, its discouraged. So stay positive. If your peers accept it, go with the majority. After all, collective judgment is infallible. Thats called groupthink. Alfred Sloan, who ran General Motors Corp. from 1923 to 1956, once said at a directors meeting: Gentlemen, I take it that we are all in complete agreement on the decision here. Then, I propose that we postpone further discussion to give ourselves time to develop disagreement and perhaps gain some understanding of what the decision is all about. So whats an independent-minded person to do when faced with colleagues who are living in an echo chamber of their opinions? Remaining silent or even resigning is an option, but then the lone skeptical voice is lost. Debating the majority point by point and countering their premises in a matching sales-pitch voice are judged to be argumentative and unsupportiveand thus get discounted as background noise. Yet have you ever noticed how the distinctive occasional chirp of a single bird stands out and commands your attention? Can that image be extended to a business meeting experiencing groupthink over a hare-brained proposal supported by the boss or a majority of the group? Instead of mounting a full-scale counterattack, ask one or two penetrating questions or show skepticism in a voice that does not sound like a sales pitch. Then disengage. The result may surprise you. It wont happen all the time, but on occasion the tone of the discussion will shift. A participant who has been relatively quiet up until now will restate one of the penetrating questions or rephrase an earlier skeptical comment. While there is no guarantee that the idea will be rejected, at least the discussion will rise to a more exploratory level. Look Into LLC
Status STANLEY ZAROWIN, a former JofA senior editor, is now a contributing editor to the magazine. His e-mail address is zarowin@mindspring.com.
|
|||