oney laundering is so widespread CPAs are likely
to encounter it at some point in their work. It
is an essential element of the underground
economy, which, worldwide, amounts to
trillions of dollars. An independent
auditors responsibilities in the area of
money laundering, because it is a criminal act,
are governed by Statement on Auditing Standards
no. 54, Illegal Acts by Clients, which
requires CPAs to be familiar with the types of
illegal behaviors that could have a direct and
material impact on financial statements. The new
fraud standard, SAS no. 99, Consideration of
Fraud in Financial Statements, requires
independent auditors to assess the risk that
fraud could materially misstate the financials. Eddie Antar, the president and CEO of
Crazy Eddies Electronics, a nationwide
chain, and architect of a classic
money-laundering scheme recounted here, shared a
common problem with everyone else who has ever
accumulated illegal loot: where to hide it. In
this article CPAs will learn the basics of money
launderingwhat it is, how it is
accomplished, ways to detect it and how thieves
hide the money.
In money laundering the
fraudster disguises the existence, nature,
source, ownership, location and disposition of
property derived from criminal activity. Currency
is a popular commodity in criminal activity; it
is fungibleone dollar looks just like
anotherand further loses its identity when
entering the economic stream. The downside is
that currency is bulky and vulnerable to
discovery, especially with todays
heightened security. Also, the launderer is
hardly in a position to complain to the
authorities if it is stolen.
The trick for money
launderersfrom dishonest businessmen to the
drug kingpinsis to deposit currency into
financial institutions without drawing attention.
If they succeed at this, they greatly reduce
their chances of being discovered and can use the
money for a variety of purposes. If, on the other
hand, alert CPAs recognize the signs of criminal
activity, their plans will be foiled.
LEGITIMATE
BUSINESS/ILLEGAL MONEY
Fraudsters use two
methods to launder funds in a legitimate
business. Overstatement of reported revenues means
that illegal money is mixed with legitimate
money, thereby boosting total revenues. The
downside of this method is the perpetrator must
pay taxes on the money. To avoid this, many
launderers make extra payments to themselves in
the form of disguised consulting fees, salaries
and the like. Balance sheet laundering occurs
when the thief parks the money in the company
bank account. The problem with this method is
that it is easily detected; the company bank
accounts would be overstated by the same amount
when compared with the financial statements.
However, balance-sheet laundering provides one
major benefit to the miscreant: The illegal loot
is safely locked away in a bank.
ON
THE ALERT
There are common threads that CPAs should
be aware of that have emerged from
studying money-laundering schemes. Small
companieswhich typically have fewer
employees and less stringent internal
controlsare most likely to be used
as vehicles for money laundering.
Attempting to deposit ill-gotten gains to
a large entity, although not impossible,
usually requires too many conspirators
inside the company.
Certain types of
businessesespecially those that
deal in currencyhave historically
been favored for concealing dirty money.
These include bars, restaurants and
nightclubs.
The most obvious clue to the
use of a legitimate business to launder
money is in the companys profit
margin. Money launderers sometimes prefer
to pay taxes on their ill-gotten gains,
as it legitimizes the transaction. CPAs
should be suspicious when profits are
well beyond industry norms.
Similarly, the owners of a
small business used as a money-laundering
front are likely to be extremely
well-compensated. Ostentatious displays
of wealth by the owners or employees are
a red flag that something crooked may be
afoot.
Owners taking frequent trips
out of the country.
|
Currency
Reporting Requirements
The Bank
Secrecy Act requires entities to
maintain certain records,
including currency transactions
(deposits or withdrawals) of
$10,000 or more. In those cases,
the entity must file with the
Treasury Department a currency
transaction report (CTR), IRS
form 4789, or other appropriate
forms (31 USC sections 1829b,
1951-59 and 5311-30).
Among other items, a
CTR discloses the names of
persons conducting the
transaction, address and
identifying information on the
customer and the name of the
financial institution. For
reporting purposes the following
are considered financial
institutions.
Banks.
Securities
brokerages.
Currency
exchange houses.
Insurance
and loan companies.
Travel
agencies.
Issuers of
cashiers checks or money
orders.
Auto, boat
and airplane dealers.
Casinos.
Real estate
companies.
Source: Fraud
Examiners Manual, Third Edition,
Association of Certified Fraud
Examiners, www.cfenet.com, 1999.
|
|
White-collar
professionals sometimes are used to help launder
money. Through investments, trust accounts, funds
transfers and tax avoidance schemes, these
professionals can manipulate the financial,
commercial and legal systems to conceal the
origin and ownership of assets. CPAs should be
especially alert to offshore transactions that
appear to have little economic substance.
Additionally, since money launderers gravitate
toward a small cadre of lawyers and brokers to
accomplish their illegal goals, be wary of
professionals with questionable reputations.
Money laundering is a
three-step process of placement, layering and
integration that is clearly illustrated in Crazy
Eddies scheme.
A
CASE STUDY
Eddie Antar, one
of the most shameless white-collar criminals in
the last half of the 20th century, limped onto
his latest of many flights from New York to Tel
Aviv, Israel. Stiff and unable to bend, he could
barely maneuver into his first-class seat for the
10-hour ride. Other passengers probably thought
Antar was crippled. The flight attendants were
particularly attentive to his needs.
| But no one on the plane realized
why Antar really was having mobility
problems: He had tens of thousands of
dollars strapped to his body, cash that
he and family members had skimmed from
their thriving electronics chain. Even
more cash was stuffed in his luggage.
Eddies original plan was to cheat
the tax man. But after skimming millions
of dollars, he and family members thought
of a better use for the hidden loot: It
would be funneled back to Crazy
Eddies disguised as revenue. This
trick helped boost the stock price in
their IPO, which eventually led to a
financial statement fraud of more than
$100 million. Placement.
When Antar arrived in Tel Aviv, he
immediately went to his luxury hotel. A
bellman deposited his heavy bags in the
room. Of course, Antar never took his
eyes off the man carrying the treasure.
Once alone, he locked the door and
divided the neatly wrapped bills into
stacks small enough to fit inside his
briefcase. Then, one briefcase at a time,
he hauled the loot to an Israeli bank for
deposit. In less than a day, Eddie traded
the batches of bulky currency for a dozen
deposit slips.
|
Noncooperating
Countries and Territories
Money can
be laundered in any country,
including the United States. Most
of the well-known Caribbean
money-laundering
havens now cooperate with
international authorities. The
Financial Action Task Force on
Money Laundering keeps a list of
noncooperative countries and
territories. As of March 2003,
the list included
Cook Islands
Egypt
Guatemala
Indonesia
Myanmar
Nauru
Nigeria
Philippines
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Ukraine
Source: www.fatf-gafi.org.
|
|
The process of depositing the laundered
money in banks is called placement and
can be accomplished in several ways. The simplest
method is to add the currency to the revenues of
a cash-intensive business. But another way is to
move the currency offshore, as in Antars
case. Although some nations and islands have
reputations as havens, having money in nearly any
foreign country greatly complicates tracing it.
And thats exactly what the money launderer
wants. Other popular hiding methods include
breaking the money into smaller quantities in
order to evade U.S. banking requirements that
require currency transactions over $10,000 be
reported to the Treasury Department. The smaller
sums then can be deposited in a variety of banks;
this is known as smurfing. Currency can
be used to purchase cashiers checks and
money orders that can be deposited into other
institutions. A sophisticated laundering
operation sometimes involves hundreds of banks.
CPAs should be alert to businesses that have a
questionable rationale for using multiple bank
accounts.
Layering. Once
Antars Israeli bank balance was swollen
with cash, he came up with a way to dodge the
scrutiny of Israeli officials should they inquire
on their own or on behalf of American
investigators. The money was wire transferred to
a bank in Panama, a country then known for its
secrecy laws.
From there Antar could transfer
the money by wire or by check to any bank of his
choosing in the world. The more transfers he
made, the more layers he put between himself and
the original source of the illicit
fundshence the term layering. A
sophisticated laundering operation could have
hundreds of layers.
Integration. Eddie
Antar eventually wired more than $8 million to
Panama from his Israeli bank. He then gradually
transferred the funds to the accounts of Crazy
Eddies Inc., where they were mixed with
legitimate sales. This is the process of integration,
where ill-gotten gain is returned to the economy
disguised as legitimate income.
When Antar returned the money
as sales to Crazy Eddies, the $8 million of
skimmed money boosted the stock price and created
more than $40 million in added equity for the
Antar clan. Antar later cashed out his shares and
left the United States with more than $30
million. Authorities finally caught up with the
international fugitive and returned him to the
United States, where he served eight years in
prison.
Money laundering is a serious
and growing problem, despite government efforts
to control it. Preventing and detecting crime
therefore requires efforts of both the public and
private sectors. CPAs can be a major deterrent to
the serious and growing problem of money
laundering by recognizing its earmarks. 
JOSEPH T. WELLS, CPA, CFE, is
founder and chairman of the Association of
Certified Fraud Examiners and professor of fraud
examination at the University of Texas at Austin.
Mr. Wells won the Lawler Award for the best JofA
article in 2000 and 2002 and has been inducted
into the Journal of Accountancy Hall of
Fame. His e-mail address is joe@cfenet.com.
Federal Laws Target
Money-Laundering Crimes
Evasion of
reporting requirements. The
U.S. code prohibits the structuring of
transactions for the purpose of evading
reporting requirements. It includes a
fine of up to $500,000 and incarceration
of up to 10 years (31 USC section 5324).Money
laundering. These sections
of the code prohibit a person from using
the proceeds of unlawful activity in a
financial transaction with the intent to
disguise or conceal the nature, location,
source, ownership or control of the
proceeds. It also prohibits the
transportation, transmission or transfer
of funds into or out of the United States
if the person knows the funds are the
proceeds of illegal activity (18 USC
sections 1956 and 1957).
Racketeering. The
code considers violations of the
money-laundering statutes (described
above) to be predicate
offenses constituting racketeering
activity under the Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The
statute provides for both civil and
criminal actions against violators (18
USC sections 1961-68).
Seizures and forfeitures. These
code sections provide for civil seizure
and forfeiture of property involved in
certain crimes including money
laundering. It also deals with criminal
forfeitures.
Source:
Fraud Examiners Manual, Third Edition,
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners,
www.cfenet.com, 1999.
|
|