| The above
scenario could apply to just about any business
that maintains few or poor internal controls over
its deliveries. Of course, other problems could
have caused such budget woes: The supplier simply
may not have cared about making accurate
deliveries, or your client could have fallen
victim to a common fraud scheme in which a vendor
ships products that werent ordered but will
be paid for at inflated prices. After getting
away with it once, crooked vendors know your
client has poor internal controls and that she
just assumes she ordered the items, they were
delivered and she should pay the bill. A third
possibility: Her employees could have been
checking in orders but stealing the inventory. If
your client cant afford an expensive
internal control system, here are some defensive
measures she can choose from to ensure proper
handling of deliveries. She can Use numbered purchase
orders when buying goods, and issue to employees
who receive items (a kitchen manager or prep
cook, for example) a list of these numbers to
verify an order was actually placed. Ask
the supplier to include purchase order numbers on
the packing slip. Receiving workers then accept
only goods they can verify against the purchase
order list. However, this doesnt involve
counting the goods received. Caution: If
purchases under a certain dollar amount do not
require any verification, crooks can take
advantage of this. For example, if your
clients approval level is $500, a dishonest
supplier might ship orders around $450 on a
regular basis. Even worse, the crook could just
send her a bill for an amount below the threshold
and never send any products at all.
Give receiving
workers copies of original purchase orders to
compare with the packing slips. While
the first tip helps your client verify she
ordered the goods, it does not provide assurance
regarding the quantities involved. Using this
measure, the receiving employees can compare the
quantity on the purchase order with that on the
packing slip. Caution: Your client still
wont know whether the supplier delivered
everything it was supposed to unless employees
actually count the goods delivered.
Assign an
employee who does the accounting the task of
comparing the purchase orders with the packing
slips. Your client can use this
low-cost procedure for some minimal protection
against theft. Segregating duties by having
someone in accounting, instead of a receiving
worker, compare purchase orders with packing
slips adds a level of assurance. Caution: Remind
your client the supplier can manipulate the data
on a packing slip to suit its needs.
Provide
receiving workers copies of the original purchase
orders but with the quantities ordered blanked
out. Your client could require
employees not only to compare the purchase order
with the packing slip, but also to fill in the
quantities of goods received. She also can
request the vendor not include a packing slip
with the items. In this way, the receiving
employees wont have any idea how many items
your client expects. Caution: These
tasks take a long time and, therefore, are
costly.
Give the
receiving employees copies of the purchase
invoicesand on a random basis, erase the
quantities. This approach has the
advantage of minimizing the time and cost of
checking in all deliveries yet provides a higher
level of control. If the workers regularly
perform this random counting, the process should
provide feedback on whether the supplier properly
delivers goods on a regular basis. Your client
could reduce her exposure to large losses by
blanking out the quantities for more expensive
products, thus requiring receiving employees to
verify these items.
Have someone in
accounting match the packing slips to the
original purchase orders and verified receiving
reports. This helps to ensure your
client pays agreed-upon prices only for goods
ordered and received. The procedure also keeps
tabs on whether receiving employees are checking
in deliveries with care.
While none of the above
measures can guarantee the complete elimination
of losses, they can help to limit them.
|