What will make CPAs work hardfor you?
Pay Your Staff for
PERFORMANCE
BY ROBERT
B. SCOTT, JR.
| EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY |
- INCREASING
THE PRODUCTIVE, efficient, billable
use of each staff members time
well into the 1,500 to 2,000 hour annual
range is the key to a firms
bottom-line improvement.
- ANY
FIRM THAT BILLS AND COLLECTS less
than an average of 2.4 times base salary
for staff time should consider a plan
based on performance. The plan has three
components: a competitive base salary
and, when earned, a productivity bonus
and a new business bonus.
- THE
PRODUCTIVITY BONUS PLAN provides
an incentive to staff members to boost
billable time by working productively,
seeking additional assignments, spotting
opportunities for additional work with
existing clients and meeting the budget
on fixed-fee engagements.
- A NEW
BUSINESS BONUS equal to 10% to
20% of the first years fees from a
new client, paid as collected, can
stimulate substantial staff interest in
practice development. The bonus pays for
itself roughly 20 times overa
return on investment of 2,000%.
- TO
SUPPORT THE PRODUCTIVITY BONUS, a
firm needs only an additional
net-billed-fee summary/worksheet for each
staff member each firm fiscal year. It
takes less clerical effort than an
overtime system does because the
calculations are made yearly rather than
monthly or weekly.
- NO
BONUS IS PAID when the
calculation produces a negative result. A
firm should pay the productivity bonus
within 30 days of the close of the fiscal
year.
|
| ROBERT
B. SCOTT, Jr., CPA, is a professor of management
at the Gabelli School of Business at Roger
Williams University in Bristol, Rhode Island, and
a practice strategy and growth consultant. His
e-mail address is rbs@alpha.rwu.edu. |
ush, you
husky, is meaningful encouragement to sled dogs,
but the rest of us need something more. Ask managing
partners which incentives best inspire strong staff
performance and opinions range across the board. Some
practitioners credit cash bonuses as motivators, and
others cite the effectiveness of flexible work
arrangements, lunchtime yoga classes and office
concierges. Still, every CPA knows the bottom-line
profits of an accounting firm depend on staff
productivity times adequate billing ratesand
hard-working staff members who show initiative and use
time efficiently are the key.
| The
typical sole practitioner with more than 10
years experience, earning $100,000 to
$200,000 per year, will log an average of 1,710
billable hours per year. Another 40 billable
hours per year will push his or her firm into the
top 25% in profitability in its class. Source:
Texas Society of CPAs 1999 MAP survey.
|
The
principle seems simple, but profitability is more
sensitive to variations in these factors than many
practitioners realize. Because staff members ultimately
make the call on how much effort to put into their work,
a carefully crafted bonus plan can improve performance by
linking staff efficiency to systematically applied
rewards. Using the approach described here, large and
small firms can attract, retain and motivate the
high-quality staff necessary for success in an intensely
competitive professional environment.
KEY ELEMENTS OF PROFIT PERFORMANCE
The formula for increasing
profits based on revenue from billable staff time starts
with the building block of the employees hourly
wage. A standard hourly billing rate is about .0018 times
the employees base annual salary, rounded up to the
nearest dollar. This yields a $90 per hour billing rate
for a staff member earning $50,000 per year ($50,000 X .0018 =
$90), consistent with most guidelines in the profession.
Operating statistics for a
variety of small and midsize CPA firms and data from the
recent national MAP survey published by the Texas Society
of CPAs suggest that a typical firm bills an average of
approximately 1,400 hours annually per staff member and
collects 90% to 95% of that. Expressed another way, the
typical practitioner or small firm bills and collects an
average of roughly twice salary and fringe benefits
annually for each professional employee. Out-of-pocket
breakeven is approximately 1.2 times base salary (because
of fringe benefits) or 667 standard hoursabout
$60,000 annually for a $50,000 per year employee.
In exhibit 1, below,
collection (the average percentage of standard fees
collected for billed time) is presented in units ranging
from 100% (ideal) to 60% and compared with a range of
billable hours from 2,000 total (ideal) to 1,000 (below
average). At 1,400 billable hours with 90% collection,
the contribution margin generated by a $50,000 per year
staff member is $53,400 (after deducting the $10,000
fringe benefit). Each additional 100 hours of charged
time (at 90% collection) generates $8,100 of incremental
margin.
| Exhibit 1: Staff
Contribution Margin (in thousands) |
| Calculations
are based on a $50,000 per year salary;
$10,000 per year in fringe benefits; and
a $90 per hour billing rate. |
| |
At
fee collection percentage |
| Billable
hours |
100% |
90% |
80% |
70% |
60% |
| 2,000 |
$120 |
$102.0 |
$84.0 |
$66.0 |
$48.0 |
| 1,900 |
111 |
93.9 |
76.8 |
59.7 |
42.6 |
| 1,800 |
102 |
85.8 |
69.6 |
53.4 |
37.2 |
| 1,700 |
93 |
77.7 |
62.4 |
47.1 |
31.8 |
| 1,600 |
84 |
69.6 |
55.2 |
40.8 |
26.4 |
| 1,500 |
75 |
61.5 |
48.0 |
34.5 |
21.0 |
| 1,400 |
66 |
53.4 |
40.8 |
28.2 |
15.6 |
| 1,300 |
57 |
45.3 |
33.6 |
21.9 |
10.2 |
| 1,200 |
48 |
37.2 |
26.4 |
15.6 |
4.8 |
| 1,100 |
39 |
29.1 |
19.2 |
9.3 |
(0.6) |
| 1,000 |
30 |
21.0 |
12.0 |
3.0 |
(6.0) |
|
| Source:
Robert B. Scott, Jr. |
|
At 1,400
hours and 90% collection, each percentage point of
improved collection yields another $1,260 of incremental
margin. The difference between 1,400 hours at 90%
collection (just above breakeven) and 1,800 hours at 97%
is $43,740 of additional marginthats
profiton one $50,000 staff member.
Increasing the productive,
efficient, billable use of each staff
members time well into the 1,500 to 2,000 hour
annual range is the key to a firms bottom-line
improvement. It is easier said than done, of course. In a
strong job market, salary buys compliance only with
minimum work standards, and employees can shrug off
demands they find excessive. Overtime pay rewards hours
clockedmaybe even inefficiencynot
performance. Discretionary bonuses often are arbitrary in
nature and influenced by personal factors; many employees
resent them. There is a way to make your staff care,
thoughby systematically linking their extra effort
to a cash reward.
PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION
Any firm that bills and
collects less than an average of 2.4 times base salary
for staff time should consider a plan based on
performance. The plan costs nothing unless a
workers revenue exceeds that workers cost
plus a fair contribution to overhead and some partnership
profit. Bonuses are paid out of incremental profits. The
plan has three components:
Competitive base
salary.
Productivity
bonus.
New business
bonus.
Each staff member is paid
a competitive base salary and, when earned, a
productivity bonus and/or a new business bonus.
Heres how to mesh the elements of the plan.
Base salary. Make
each staff members base salary competitive with
quality firms in the practice area. Dont make the
mistake of trying to substitute bonuses for base salary.
Bonuses always should be in addition to competitive
salaries; otherwise, they dont offer staff members
additional incentive. Continue to make annual adjustments
to base salary exactly as if there was no bonus program.
Productivity
bonus. Pay each staff member an annual
productivity bonus based on this simple formula, applied
to each staff member individually: net fees billed for
staff members time, minus staff members base
salary multiplied by 2.4, divided by two. It looks like
this
| Productivity
bonus = |
Net
fees billed (2.4 X base salary) |
| |
2 |
Heres what it
boils down to: A $50,000 per year staff member whose
billing rate is $90 per hour gets to keep half of
everything she generates over $120,000 ($60,000 equals
her salary plus fringe benefits; $60,000 is the
firms). Two thousand billable hours will bring in
$180,000, of which $60,000 is performance-based revenue.
The productivity bonus splits fees in excess of 2.4 times
base salary with the staff member on a 50/50 basis and
earns her a $30,000 bonusshe gets half of the gravy
(see exhibit 2, below).
| Exhibit 2: Effort Times
Hours Yields Dollars |
| Calculations
are based on a $50,000 per year salary;
$10,000 per year in fringe benefits; and
a $90 per hour billing rate. |
| Net fees |
Standard
hours |
Bonus |
Bonus % |
Compensation** |
Contribution |
Contribution
% |
| $72,000 |
800 |
$0 |
0% |
$50,000 |
$12,000 |
17% |
| 90,000 |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
50,000 |
30,000 |
33 |
| 108,000 |
1,200 |
0 |
0 |
50,000 |
48,000 |
44 |
| 126000 |
1,400 |
3,000 |
6 |
53,000 |
63,000 |
50 |
| 144,000 |
1,600 |
12,000 |
24 |
62,000 |
72,000 |
50 |
| 162,000 |
1,800 |
21,000 |
42 |
71,000 |
81,000 |
50 |
| 180,000 |
2,000 |
30,000 |
60 |
80,000 |
90,000 |
50 |
| 198,000 |
2,200 |
39,000 |
78 |
59,000 |
99,000 |
50 |
|
*Based on
hours at 100% collection.
**Does not include fringe benefits
(assumed to equal 20% of base salary) or
new business bonus. |
| Source:
Robert B. Scott, Jr. |
|
Exhibit 3,
below, graphically illustrates productivity bonus results
at various levels of staff activity for an individual
staff member with a $50,000 base salary. The revenue
value of various levels of billable standard hours is
presented in amounts ranging from $50,000
(unsatisfactory) to $150,000 (good); and bonuses, bonus
percentages, compensation, contribution margin and
percentage contribution margin are depicted.
| Exhibit 3: Charting a Staff
Members Enterprise Zone |
| Calculations
are based on a $50,000 per year salary;
$10,000 per year in fringe benefits; and
a $90 per hour billing rate. |
| Individual
staff member cost-volume-profit analysis |

|
| Source:
Robert B. Scott, Jr. |
|
The plan
pays nothing for average or slightly above average
performance, such as when the $50,000 per year employee
generates less than $120,000 in fee revenue for the
yearthe equivalent of 1,333.33 standard hours at
100% collection. However, above that level the bonus plan
begins to provide a powerful incentive to staff members
to boost billable time by working productively, seeking
additional assignments, spotting opportunities for
additional work with existing clients, meeting the budget
on fixed-fee engagements and otherwise working in ways
that serve the interests of their employers.
For example, at 1,600
standard hours an employee with a $50,000 base salary and
a $90 billing rate (see exhibit 2) will generate 1,600 X $90, or
$144,000 in fee revenue: $144,000 ($50,000 base
salary X 2.4) = $24,000 of fees in excess of 2.4 times
base salary. Splitting this amount evenly between the
firm and the employee results in a $12,000 bonus (24% of
base salary) to the employee and a $12,000 profit
increase to the firm. At 1,800 standard hours, or
$162,000 in fees, both the bonus and the profit increase
rise to $21,000. Contrast this with straight salary,
salary plus overtime, salary plus arbitrary bonus or
other compensation schemes traditionally used in the
accounting profession. How would you prefer to be paid?
The productivity bonus
approach makes it possible for profits and staff
compensation to increase by equal amounts simultaneously.
Because the firm retains half of the gain and pays the
other half as a bonus, in effect staff members
earn their bonuses twice over. The method
doesnt have a down side, although it does require
firm owners to share profits with employees. Owners
reluctant to do so may think compensation is a zero-sum
(if you get more, I get less) game. However, a plan such
as this can put additional money in everybodys
pocket by increasing the size of the profit pool. It is
simple and fair: You pay for results, not promises.
NEW BUSINESS BONUS
A new business bonus equal
to 10% to 20% of the first years fees from a new
client, paid as collected, can stimulate substantial
staff interest in practice development. Such a bonus
amounts to splitting the profit on a new client, for one
year only, with the staff member who brings the business
in the door. Used in conjunction with the productivity
bonus, a new business bonus can help staff members to
think more like practice owners, in the sense of always
looking for new clients and more efficient ways to do
things. Staff members who appreciate the financial
dynamics of the profession also recognize the need for
growth, staff training and high staff utilization.
However, if you use artificially low first-year fees to
obtain new clients, a new business bonus isnt
practical for your firm.
A 10% new business bonus
to a staff member amounts to 5% or less of the net
present value of the profits on a client that lasts five
years. So if offering the bonus results in a new client
that lasts five years, the bonus pays for itself roughly
20 times overa return on investment of 2,000%. And
since it is a no new clients, no bonus
policy, there is zero risk. Its like betting after
the race is over. Even if the client leaves after a
single year, the return is more than 400% in most
practices.
ADMINISTRATION
Assuming that the firm has
an accurate and timely client billing procedure and that
the firms fiscal year-end falls during the slow
season (avoiding cutoff and similar problems),
administration of an incentive plan of this type is not
difficult. In fact, it takes less clerical effort than an
overtime system does, since the calculation is made once
each year. Administration of the productivity bonus
requires only preparation of a net-billed-fee
summary/worksheet for each staff member each firm fiscal
year. The new business bonus is based directly on
collections from new clients and is easy to compute and
pay.
As jobs are closed out
(final billed) for the year, the administrative partner
or manager determines the net-fee collection percentage
and the net billed fee attributable to each staff member
who worked on the job. (Staff net fee collection
percentage times an individual staff members
accumulated standard time charges for a job equals the
net billed fee earned by that staff member on that
assignment.) The net billed fee earned on each job is
posted to the staff members net-billed-fee
summary/worksheet.
At year-end the staff
members net-billed-fee summary/worksheet provides
the basis for calculating his or her productivity bonus.
(No bonus is paid when the calculation produces a
negative result.) Remember, under this plan, employees
have been exerting themselves for months to reap the
benefits of their good performance, so pay the
productivity bonus within 30 days of the close of the
firms fiscal year.
A firm that wants to offer
meaningful incentives to inspire staff performance should
consider the productivity and new business bonus system:
Cash, anyone?
Practitioners Talk
About Compensation
Staff compensation is a
frequent topic of discussion among CPAs.
Three experienced practitioners share their
views.
Charles
Rae, Jr.
Rae
& Co., Fishkill, New York
RaeCPA@worldnet.att.net
Charles Rae has been a CPA since the early
1970s, working in large and small public
accounting firms as well as in private industry
and education. Rae started his own firm in 1978
and believes retaining quality employees is a
paramount challenge every firm faces in an
increasingly competitive environment. He
continues to look for better ways to reward staff
excellence.
The biggest obstacle for some firms is
psychological, says Rae, who has always
been comfortable with an incentive policy.
Not everyone wants employees to participate
fully in profits and benefits, which is a 1960s
perspective. Tax staff at Raes firm
can earn bonuses based on tax return revenues
they produce. Additional tax professionals are
being recruited, and supervisors will be able to
earn piggyback bonuses based on revenues
generated by junior staff. I want to
encourage good use of newer staff, Rae
says.
Rae, who thinks C corporations provide the
widest range of opportunities for advantageous
tax treatment, plans to form such an entity. The
firm will transfer all tax preparation functions
to it, offering tax-free benefits such as medical
and travel reimbursement, pensions and cars to
his employees. It will reduce my dollar
outlay and put more in the employees
pockets, he says.
Depending on how developed a practice is, Rae
thinks other compensation components, can work
well. Deferred bonuses for remaining with the
firm for a stipulated period of time encourage
new staff to stay put. The bonus formula
described in the article spurs hard work and new
business development for a young practitioner
starting his or her firm. Older practitioners
contemplating retirement may wish to defer
payment of a portion of bonuses earned under a
plan to encourage staff retention until a
retirement game plan is securely in place.
Every practice is different, says
Rae, so theres no standard
formula. 
Margaret
Bellucci
Black
Point Associates, LLP, Brookline, Massachusetts
mmbell745@aol.com
In 1992 Margaret Bellucci, CPA and partner of
a firm, teamed up with Mary Thornton, a former
registered nurse with an MBA, to establish Black
Point Associates, a cross-disciplinary firm
offering high-end consulting services to the
behavioral health industry. They first focused on
strategic planning, efficiency and cost studies,
but industry concerns and their own professional
instincts soon led them into the burgeoning field
of regulatory compliance assistance. The 1996
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA) created a wealth of compliance
concerns. Bellucci and Thornton recognized a
fresh professional market and moved quickly.
Along the way, they had growing pains.
In 1997 Bellucci and Thornton added three
experienced partners to the team: an IT
specialist, a PhD psychologist and a
generalist/strategic planner. Black Point
Associates became a high-powered
boutique with a loose organizational
structure and no administrative staff. Each
partner was supposed to market his or her skills
and the firm overall, and was to be paid based on
the revenue generated. That was the theory.
It was a total failure, says
Bellucci. Some partners couldnt market well
and couldnt understand the entrepreneurial
modelthey expected work to be handed to
them as if they were employees. One by one, the
partners bailed out.
On their own again, Bellucci and Thornton
searched for a joint-venture partner to
complement their strengths. It took 18 months to
locate psychologist Derek Jansen. After working
on a trial basis, Jansen was invited to join
Black Point as a partner.
Bellucci is a specialist in federal cost
accounting compliance and administrative matters.
Thornton is the operations guru and author of a
popular book on behavioral health industry
regulatory compliance strategies. Jansen combines
professional knowledge of behavioral health
services with a thorough understanding of
billing, coding, and service documentation
standards. Their client-base is nationwide and
growing.
The current organization and compensation
scheme is simple. Billing rates range from $1,500
to $1,900 per day. Bellucci and Thornton keep 90
percent of their time charges, as collected, as
compensation. The rest stays in the firm. Jansen,
who is purchasing an equal interest in the firm,
retains a lower percentage, which will increase
as his ownership interest grows. Compensation is
based on individual engagement charges,
motivating each partner to seek new engagements.
The next challenge, according to Bellucci, is
to leverage the strengths of Black Point by
adding layers of professional staffing without
sacrificing the sense of new era
entrepreneurial success currently enjoyed. Bonus
compensation will be part of the new growth.
This is a compatible and successful
team, she says. We have a real
opportunity to think about the value each of us
brings to the firm and to structure our roles and
compensation for the future. 
Stephen
Fay
Fay
& Associates, PC, Quincy, Massachusetts
smf@faycpa.com
Steve Fay started his practice in 1996, after
leaving a partnership position with another firm.
A CPA with a law degree, Fay is proficient in a
broad spectrum of auditing, accounting, tax,
estate and management consulting areas. He knows
his success depends on an excellent staff, and
their success depends on him.
Were all in this together,
Fay says, and that has to be reflected in
the compensation structure. Employees at
Fay & Associates, PC, participate in a 401(k)
plan featuring a 50% matching component as well
as profit-sharing and new business bonuses. The
new business bonuses are discretionary rather
than formula based. Some new clients simply
are more valuable to the firm than others,
says Fay. And more than one staff member
may be involved in bringing them in. For
example, a new $40,000 client typically will
generate a 10% to 20% bonus, which might be paid
to one staff member, split among several or added
to the profit-sharing pool.
Fays key bit of advice for other
practitioners: Give staff a sense of
ownership. Employees need to feel that they are
being compensated as if they were owners. If they
bring in profitable business that enhances the
bottom line, they should be rewarded. 
|
|