| |
| |
| Unexpected problems for
companies operating as LLCs. |
From The Tax Adviser:
Determining
the Form of Doing Business in Canada
ith its undervalued currency, stable economy
and easy access, Canada appears to be the perfect place
in which to start a business.
FORM
OF THE BUSINESS
Once a company decides to
set up shop in Canada, the next issue to be addressed is
the structure of the business.
Among the forms that Canadian business
activities may take are corporations, limited liability
companies (LLCs) and regular or limited partnerships.
Also possible (but only in Nova Scotia) is an unlimited
liability company, which may be treated as a corporation
for Canadian tax purposes but as a partnership for U.S.
tax purposes.
U.S. pass-through
entities. In the United States, corporate
earnings may be subject to double taxation: The
corporation is taxed when income is earned, and the
shareholder is taxed when the corporation distributes
dividends.
To avoid this situation, Americans can
structure their businesses as limited partnerships, S
corporations or LLCs. Through any of these, the
individual shareholder or partner includes the
businesss income on his or her personal tax return,
thereby avoiding the double taxation problem.
Canadian treatment of
U.S. entities. Canadian law does not
provide relief from double taxation. When an individual
taxpayer makes an investment in a Canadian company, the
corporation is subject to Canadian corporate tax and the
investor is subject to a U.S. personal tax on dividend
distributions. And while the U.S. allows the shareholder
to take a foreign tax credit (FTC) (which effectively
eliminates most of his or her additional tax burden),
there is no corresponding FTC available to a U.S.
individual investor for Canadian tax paid at the
corporate level.
CANADIAN
TAXATION
In general, anyone employed, carrying on business or
earning pension or investment income in Canada or
disposing of Canadian assets is subject to tax. If a
taxpayer meets Canadian residency criteria, the taxpayer
is subject to tax on worldwide income rather than just
Canadian-source income.
EFFECT
OF TREATIES
Canada has entered into treaties with many countries,
which serve to reduce (or eliminate) any double taxation
that otherwise could result. However, this relief is
available only to residents of a treaty country; to be
considered as such, the entity must be fully subject to
taxation on its worldwide income in the country of
residence.
Treaty benefits
available to U.S. entities. A corporation
that has elected S status is considered subject to full
comprehensive U.S. taxation. Canada will recognize an S
corporation as a U.S. resident for treaty purposes.
Under U.S. tax law, limited
partnerships and LLCs are considered to be partnerships
and can elect to be treated as corporations for tax
purposes. In Canada, however, a limited partnership is
not recognized as a corporation resident in the U.S.
Instead, Canada looks to the residency of each limited
partner to determine whether such members can obtain
treaty benefits.
Possible LLC trap. Canadas
treatment of U.S. LLCs can lead to unexpected, adverse
results. Under U.S. tax law, an LLC is considered to be a
partnership; all its earnings are included in the
shareholders (not the LLCs) income. In Canada
an LLC is considered a corporation. As such, the LLC
itself is the Canadian taxpayer as to Canadian-source
income; Canada will not look through to the LLC members.
Therefore, an LLC resident in the United States that
derives revenue from Canada cannot rely on the
U.S.-Canadian treaty to avoid a corporate-level tax. And
without the treaty benefits, the Canadian taxes due on
income sourced in Canada will be significantly higher
than if the treaty provisions applied.
For a detailed discussion of this and
other current developments, see the Tax Clinic, edited by
Anthony Bakale, in the August 2002 issue of The Tax
Adviser.
Nicholas Fiore,
editor
The Tax Adviser
|