July 4, 2009
 
 
  Business and Industry
 

November 1997

Supplement editor: Hadassah Baum, hbaum@aicpa.org
CPA Letter editor: Ellen Goldstein, egoldstein@aicpa.org

ARTICLES

Introducing Benchmarking for Small Companies

New! Value-Added Auditing Services Conference

Codes of Ethics, Practice and Conduct

Twelve Steps to Recovery for Executives in Denial about the Year 2000 Issue

Books to Help You

OTHER SUPPLEMENTS

 

Introducing Benchmarking for Small Companies

Ever since the AICPA and The Hackett Group launched their joint finance benchmark study in 1992, companies of all sizes have been clamoring for their chance to see how they stack up against the competition and industry leaders. But until now, only companies with $50 million in annual revenues or more were included in benchmarking their finance organizations and sharing best practices due to the intricacy of the process, according to Vice President Chris Gattenio, who heads The Hackett Groups benchmark division. "Since finance staff at smaller companies wear so many different hats, its difficult to break down their time allocations into the 29 processes included in our original benchmark study," she explained. But theres been increasing widespread interest for a study to address the need for process improvement in smaller companies."

In response, The Hackett Group has developed for AICPA members a Small Company Benchmark study to help smaller organizations gain an understanding of the best practices of world-class organizations and see how they measure up. "This new benchmark study makes best practices from the more than 1,050 companies participating in our benchmark studies available for the first time to smaller companies," Gattenio said. "Its our way of helping the AICPA respond to the needs of its membership for companies of all sizes."

"The Small Company Benchmark tool is available to AICPA members at a cost of $750 each," said Hadassah Baum, AICPA technical manager and small company liaison. Any company with revenues up to $100 million is eligible to participate with no minimum revenue required. The $100 million cap will enable other eligible small companies to participate who may not have benchmarked in the past because of the complexity of the data collection process.

Companies taking part in the study will be required to participate in a kickoff conference call before receiving their data collection tool. The tool is an easy-to-use, automated survey that is completed by seeking information from budget reports, organization charts, transaction records and management interviews. After the information has been collected, the data will be analyzed and a customized report prepared comparing the company to average and top performers in the study. Benchmark results will be distributed to participants in advance of group results discussion meetings, with the 1998 schedule now being finalized. In addition to discussing the implications of the data, the best practices of leading-edge companies will be shared, as well as how they successfully implemented a change program. The entire benchmarking process will take about eight weeks to complete.

The new study was developed by considering how small companies are organized and how their staffs and work flows are structured. For example, the customer interface is probably handled by one person, so the new benchmark is designed to address processes at a higher level, rather than broken down into small component parts.

The whole thrust of benchmarking is to measure what your company is doing, compare it to other companies and then steal their learning curves. Most best practices — such as streamlining and simplifying processes and procedures, reducing transaction volumes with tools such as procurement cards and direct deposit and changing materiality policies —work for companies of all sizes.

Future growth is another reason for the importance of benchmarking. Many small companies are growing very quickly. If they learn and implement best practices today, theyll be able to absorb greater growth without adding people as they expand. Also, its easier to put these practices into place before growth takes place, rather than after.

The 29 processes benchmarked by larger entities in the finance study were aggregated at a higher level and consolidated into eight. These eight processes are: Supplier, Customer, People, Accounting, Risk Management, Regulatory, Planning & Reporting and Planning & Decision Support.

New! VALUE-ADDED AUDITING SERVICES CONFERENCE

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Institute of Internal Auditors proudly announce their first joint sponsorship of a high-impact conference that promises to be the audit event of the year. The AICPA/IIA NATIONAL VALUE-ADDED AUDITING SERVICES CONFERENCE is being held from February 24, 1998, at the Hotel Royal Plaza in WALT DISNEY WORLD VILLAGE.

Be prepared for the future. Sign up now for a multi-track program offering sessions on the auditor as consultant, innovative auditing techniques, auditing super strength systems and business issues.

This powerful conference offers a wealth of outstanding sessions on such vital issues as:

  • Anticipating and minimizing risk while maximizing results for your organization.
  • Initiating a control structure geared to responsiveness, efficiency and compliance.
  • Setting up proactive fraud detection programs and super strength computer programs while avoiding the risks they can present.
  • Strategies for successfully handling dramatic changes including new processes, policies and cultural behaviors.
  • Techniques for building effective monitoring mechanisms into joint ventures right from the start.
  • Working collaboratively with other partners.
  • How to save money in strategic alliances, mergers, acquisitions and reengineering.
  • Plus many other techniques that enhance internal auditings vitality, including control self assessment implementation approaches and strategies, pros and cons of high-tech audit tools, electronic commerce, global development, corporate governance and ethics.

Value-added auditing is not just a matter of survival in the competitive auditing arena. This conference offers you invaluable personal development so you can successfully take advantage of great opportunities now available to those auditors with powerful consulting strategies and specialized risk management skills.

Register now for this one-of-a-kind conference with a wealth of eye-opening sessions to choose from, in a luxury hotel in the heart of a family-vacation resort. If you register before December 31, 1997, save $50.

Benefits of attending the AICPA/IIA NATIONAL VALUE-ADDED AUDITING SERVICES CONFERENCE

  • Powerhouse Opener: Anthony Ridley on: Reshaping and Redirecting Strategies for Value-Added Auditing.
  • Outstanding speaker Courtenay Thompson on: Finding Fraud-Increasing Awareness and Detection Capabilities.
  • Highly informative and interactive sessions, with opportunities to ask questions and get answers.
  • A peek at the future, with high-impact suggestions for preparing NOW for the business, management, economic and legal issues you will be facing just around the corner, in the year 2000.
  • Unprecedented networking opportunities with the memberships of both the AICPA and the IIA. Youll have ample time to mingle and meet at breakfasts, luncheons and receptions, and share information and solutions one-on-one with your peers.
  • Hotel Royal Plaza in the WALT DISNEY WORLD resort is located inside the Downtown Disney Resort Area and is within footsteps of the Downtown Disney Marketplace, Pleasure Island, and Downtown Disney Westside.

Recommended CPE credits: 19 hours.

To register or for more information call: 800/862-4272


Codes of Ethics, Practice and Conduct

Corporate downsizing, and flattening hierarchies that allow greater decision-making throughout the organization, can weaken traditional, intangible controlstrust, loyalty and commitmentunless there is an ethical context (something a well-designed corporate ethics program can provide).

Written to help companies wanting to develop an internal code of ethics, Issues Paper 13, published by The Society of Management Accountants of Canada:

  • Summarizes the approach, content, structure and effectiveness of 200 corporate codes.
  • Highlights points that have come up repeatedly and should be considered.
  • Identifies 45 issues commonly addressed in corporate codes and organizes them by stakeholder group.

Theoretical Foundation Approach. The guiding principle approach relies very much on the employees self control, moral character, and commitment to the organization. The act and disclose approach says, in effect, Use your best judgment, but let us know what you are doing." Seek advice" statements rely more on externally imposed controls. Rules, in this framework, focus on specific behavior that is required or prohibited.

Types of Codes. There are three basic types of codes, differentiated by the dominant source of control.

  • A code of ethics states the values and principles that define the purpose of the company.
  • A code of practice interprets and illustrates corporate values and principles, and is addressed to the employee as individual decision maker.
  • A code of conduct is a statement of rules: This is what you must (or must not) do. In practice, corporate codes tend to include elements of all three.

Code Content
A code that is consistent in purpose, approach and content with the organizations values, culture and business objectives is more likely to be seen as credible than one that does not ring true with those who are asked to adopt it.

These elements have been found in the codes that were analyzed and are essential for them to be effective:

Introductory Letter. An introductory letter from the CEO endorsing the code unambiguously and conveying top managements support of it is recommended.

"Company-centeredness." Codes are often overly "company-centered" with an emphasis on responsibilities owed to the company. Attention should be paid to responsibilities owed by the company to other stakeholders.

Clarity. Credibility and commitment may be enhanced when important issues are given adequate treatment and when clear, precise definitions of key concepts are provided.

The Law. Codes almost always contain a section referring to adherence to the letter and spirit of laws and regulations. Accompanying this section could also be the inclusion of a duty to act honestly, fairly, and with integrity, guiding principles that are not necessarily captured in the requirement to abide by the letter and spirit of the law.

Discrimination. Discrimination and harassment in employment are ethical issues that often tend to be approached in an excessively legal fashion that does not promote the desired behavior. The preferred approach offers credible reasons why such desired conduct should be practiced.

Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts of interest should be defined and the focus should be on educating and communicating how a conflict can occur.

Compliance Provisions. A well-drafted and effective code simplifies the process of compliance.

Observations on Development and Implementation Processes Structure and Content of the Code. Many codes seem to be based on lists of issues that have developed over time rather than on a meaningful structure.

Ethical and Other Values. Most codes refer to the values and principles of the company, but they do not articulate the values or clarify how the code is consistent with these values and principles.

How Codes Are Developed. Codes usually have their organizational Home in the legal department, the human resources department, or the public affairs department. When simply asked if the code was part of the culture of the organization, all the companies who possessed codes responded affirmatively. When prompted further, however, only a handful of companies were able to say precisely how the code was a living and practiced document.

Promulgation and Access. Most companies interviewed have issued their code to all of their employees at some point over the last three years. Annual compliance sign-offs are also common for most of the companies.

Administration. The study indicated that the code is most frequently administered by the legal departments of corporations. Human resource departments also oversee and enforce them.

Subjectivity in responding to breaches of the code was predictable, as very few companies had written and formalized procedures for dealing with breaches. Disclosure and reporting procedures were not linked to the nature of the breach, nor were definite sanctions associated with particular breaches.

Organizational Advantages. Of the companies interviewed, none identified organizational advantages of a code. Put simply, codes may not contribute directly to the bottom line of the company.

Where to Go From Here? Codes may be of great assistance to management accountants in discharging their responsibilities of controlling the corporation, ensuring reliable financial reporting systems, safeguarding assets, identifying and mitigating against known risks, and providing the management control systems to assist in corporate decision-making.

Codes of Ethics, Practice and Conduct (Issues Paper #13) is available individually from the AICPA (No. 028964CLB11) or as part of The New Finance: A Handbook of Business Management (No. 028900CLB11). 800/862-4272


Twelve Steps to Recovery for Executives in Denial About the Year 2000 Issue

By Sandi Smith

Many people are becoming aware of the "Year 2000 Issue," also referred to as the millennium bug and the century date change dilemma. There have been a few stories in the general press and a lot more stories in the computer press about it.

Some executives may not understand the pervasive scope of the Year 2000 Issue. Hardware and software applications are certainly affected, but the scope is much broader. Anything that is computerized must be analyzed. This includes embedded systems that are commonly used in building systems, manufacturing process control, medical equipment, and the like.

Medium and small businesses face the most risk. Small businesses often have no backup procedures in case systems fail. Medium-sized businesses have often accumulated a lot of software over the years. Both sizes of businesses lack in-house staff who is knowledgeable in information technology. And both often lack the ability to draw upon large budgets. Capers Jones estimates that five to seven percent of medium-sized businesses will go bankrupt as a result of year 2000 problems.1

Are some executives in denial? What are we waiting for?

Even if you get your own house in order, another company can bring you down. Lets say you are dependent on a major customer and are an EDI trading partner. If the customer does not make its EDI systems compliant, orders will stop. All systems that interface externally with your business must be included in the scope of your year 2000 project.

Some executives may be waiting for the silver bullet. It wont happen. There are too many details in the technology industry for any quick fix to work. Most of the tools that have been developed work only in IBM COBOL environments, which account for only 50 percent of the problem. How can one silver bullet fix the problems we will have with ATMs, fighter jets, accounting systems, and assembly line software all at once? Better not to wait for a silver bullet.

Some executives may think the Year 2000 Issue is a "computer issue." As you can see, its much more than just a computer problem. It affects the entire business, and it affects just about every business.

As human beings, we like to procrastinate. If you are motivated to keep your business running, your year 2000 project should start today.

What can you do if an executive you know is in denial?

  1. Educate him or her as to the scope and complexity of the problem.
  2. Find a system within the executives company that will fail, and graphically demonstrate that failure.
  3. Describe the impact on the bottom line profits and sales of the company if nothing is done to correct noncompliant systems.
  4. Communicate what competitors are spending on the issue.
  5. Gain buy-in from others within the company that understand the y2k issue and gang up on the executive.
  6. Clip relevant newspaper articles that quote year 2000 experts and send them to the executive.
  7. Hire a consultant to educate the executive.
  8. Warn the executive about the legal issues and potential lawsuits if due diligence of officers and directors is not followed.
  9. Gain the executives commitment as executive sponsor of the y2k project.
  10. Offer preliminary budget estimates.
  11. Prepare a list of items that will need to be purchased as part of the project so that the executive gains an understanding of the resources involved.
  12. Prepare a staffing plan that discusses the use of internal staff or hiring of outside resources.2

So what are you doing still reading? Theres no time to waste: There are less than 800 days until 1/1/00.

Sandi Smith has completed several year 2000 projects for businesses, including CPA firms. She wrote Solving the Year 2000 Dilemma (No. 093008CLB11), available through the AICPA, and also wrote a chapter of Year 2000 Problem: Strategies and Solutions from the Fortune 100. A frequent speaker and trainer on the year 2000 problem, she is available via E-mail at sandi@cyberramp.net or by old-fashioned telephone 972/248-8378.


1 Capers Jones, "The Global Economic Impact of the Year 2000 Software Problem," Software Productivity Research, Inc., January 23, 1997, page 42.
2 Sandi Smith, Solving the Year 2000 Dilemma, AICPA, 1997.


Books to Help You

Corporate Financial Management: Strategies for Maximizing Shareholder Wealth
by Earl S. Landesman, CPA

Create a new, forward-thinking corporate financial framework that stimulates business performance! This reference takes you, step-by-step, through the entire reengineering process with current, comprehensive information. Youll understand all your corporate financial management options, and see how to put them into action. Learn how to link traditional hands-on accounting with the new management tools to result in corporate financial management that runs at todays accelerated pace of business, and increases shareholder wealth.
PRODUCT NO. 090443CLB11
$94.50 member/ $105 non-member

Target Costing and Value Engineering: Strategies in Confrontational Cost Management
by Robin Cooper, Ph.D. and Regina Slagmulder, Ph.D.

Get the bottom-line results you want with target costing — produce quality products your customers demand at a cost that gives you profits you want. Remember, as much as 90-95% of a products costs are designed inthey cannot be avoided without redesigning. With the right combination of target costing and value engineering, you can ensure that the products launched by your company are successful, creating added value for your company as well as your customers.
PRODUCT NO. 090431CLB11
$45 member/ $50 non-member

AICPA Order Department: 800/862-4272

 

 

 
 
To ensure that you can receive email messages from the AICPA, remember to update your member profile. Also, add the AICPA's email domains ("aicpa.org" and "email.aicpa.org") to your Sender Safe List, or contact your IT administrator to update your firm's email software.

©2006-2009 The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, ISO 9001 Certified
AICPA Privacy Policy and Copyright Information | Jobs at the AICPA | Contact Us
AICPA, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036
Trusted Commerce