AICPA Core Competency Framework for
Entry into the Accounting Profession
Soon to be provided through the
Framework are sample strategies and best practice
classroom techniques that academics can utilize to
address the development of requisite competencies (Phase
2) as well as a curriculum evaluation tool (Phase 3). Two
task forces have been appointed to accomplish these
objectives (see chart below).
Phase 2: Best
Practice Classroom Techniques
The Core Competency Framework Best
Practices Task Force is charged with identifying current
teaching practices that support the development of core
competencies in the Framework. Currently, the task force
is searching for generic teaching strategies/guidance
that are supported by educational literature (i.e.,
service learning, use of cases, cooperative learning,
internships, business simulations, etc.). As the task
force conducts their search for general teaching
guidance, specific teaching examples (i.e., specific
courses, lesson plans, texts) are also being accumulated.
The plan is to sort and match these strategies/examples
to the competencies they most directly address, so that
educators can link to the strategies/examples when they
need to further develop a given competency.
After a first round of searching, the
task force plans to establish criteria for which
strategies/examples to include in the Framework and set
up a methodology for identifying best practices going
forward. Plans are to report substantial progress by the
2000 Annual Meeting of the American Accounting
Association.
Phase 3:
Curriculum Evaluation Tool
The Core Competency Framework
Curriculum Evaluation Task Force is charged with
developing an online evaluation tool that educators can
use to evaluate courses or entire curricula for alignment
with Framework competencies.
Currently, the task force has split up
into subgroups to develop three components of the
evaluation process:
1. Prioritizing competency
objectives. This part of the evaluation tool will be
designed to assist with the following at the program
level:
- Coordinate accounting program
decisions about educational objectives that are
consistent with the program's mission.
- Assign weights for the
competencies in the Framework plus any other
competencies input by the user.
- Create a report of desired
competencies (with weights for an accounting
program).
2. Allocating responsibility for
competency development to educational activities.
This part of the evaluation tool will help accounting
programs and those responsible for individual education
activities (courses and other) to:
- Determine whether educational
activities are designed to adequately address
desired competencies.
- Consider possible revisions to
educational activity design.
- Allocate responsibility for the
development of desired competencies to individual
educational activities.
3. Assessing competency outcomes
and providing feedback. This part of the evaluation
tool will:
- Help accounting programs determine
whether its graduates have developed desired
competencies.
- Given competency outcomes, help
accounting programs evaluate the design of
educational activities.
The task force subgroups are
considering various development issues at this time:
- who the various users
groups/stakeholders will be,
- how the evaluation tool will link
to best practice classroom techniques; and
- what reports should the tool
create.
The task force is also planning to
conduct pilot studies of the evaluation tool prior to
rolling out to the entire academic community. Completion
date is projected for Summer 2001.
For additional background on the
Framework and presentation information, see www.aicpa.org/edu/corecomp.htm.
19992000 Core Competency Framework Best
Practices Task Force Billie
Cunningham, Chair, University of
MissouriColumbia
Lisa Cummings, Society of
Louisiana CPAs
Rick Fern, Eastern Kentucky
University
Amy Ray, University of
Tennessee
Richard Tabor, Auburn
University
Janet Tillinger, Texas
A&MCorpus Christi
19992000
Core Competency Framework Curriculum Evaluation
Task Force
Susan Wolcott, Chair, University
of Denver
Charles Davis, Baylor
University
Bob Keith, University of
South Florida
Kevin Michel, University of
Maryland University College
Carol Normand, Eastern
Illinois University
Lisa Pals, Ernst &
Young LLP
Matthew Pedersen, Great
Plains Software
Jane Rubin, American
Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business
|
|