Professional Standards Committee TSCPA Comment Letter
Comment Letter:
The Professional Standards Committee of the Texas Society of CPAs submitted a comment letter on the November 30, 2011 exposure draft with respect to misleading firm names
Published on January 26, 2012
TSCPA Professional Standards Committee Comment Letter
Comment Letter:
The Texas Society of CPAs Professional Standards Committee submitted a comment letter to the PEEC on its omnibus exposure draft dated April 4, 2011
Published on June 06, 2011
TSCPA Professional Standards Committee Comment Letter
Comment Letter:
The Professional Standards Committee of the TSCPA submitted a comment letter on the PEEC's February 2011 omnibus exposure draft
Published on May 31, 2011
Comment Letter from the TSCPA Professional Standards Committee
Comment Letter:
TSCPA Professional Standards Committee's comment letter on the June 2012 ethics exposure draft
Published on November 30, 2012
Comment Letter from the TSCPA
Comment Letter:
The Professional Standards Committee (PSC) of the TSCPA submitted a comment letter on the September 2011 exposure draft. The PSC is supportive of the proposals and recommends some clarifications to the proposed...
Published on November 08, 2011
Texas Society Professional Standards Committee
Comment Letter:
Comment letter from the Texas Society Professional Standards Committee on the September 4, 2009 ethics exposure draft
Published on April 14, 2010
Test Your Knowledge of Professional Ethics
FAQ:
Periodically, the JofA publishes answers from AICPA Professional Ethics Division staff to questions asked by AICPA members via the Institute’s Ethics Hotline or on topics related to revisions to the code
Published on October 12, 2012
November 30, 2011 Omnibus Exposure Draft
Exposure Draft:
The Professional Ethics Executive Committee is exposing for comment two new interpretations under Rule 505, Form of Organization and Name (AICPA, Professional Standards, ET sec. 505 par. .01). Proposed Interpretation No. 505-4, “Misleading Firm Names,” and proposed Interpretation No. 505-5, “Use of a Common Brand Name in Firm Name,” provide...
Published on November 29, 2011
Other Accounting Regulators and Ethics Standard Setters
Link:
Listing of Accounting Regulators and Ethics Standard Setters. Access reference materials and drafts that aid with professional standards compliance
Published on March 20, 2013
Basis for Conclusion Document for NonAttest Services
Report:
This document summarizes considerations that were deemed significant by the Professional Ethics Executive Committee (the Committee) in revising in 2003 Interpretation 101-3, Performance of Other Services (AICPA, Professional Standards, vol. 2, ET sec. 101.05) and deleting in 2003 Interpretation 101-13, Extended Audit Services (AICPA, Professional Standards, vol. 2, ET sec.101.15
Published on April 27, 2010
Proposals Approved At April-May 2012 PEEC Meeting
Article:
The Professional Ethics Executive Committee (PEEC) has adopted the following: a revised Interpretation No. 101-3, “Performance of nNonattest services,” (in part) under Rule 101, Independence (AICPA, Professional Standards, ET sec. 101 par. .05); a new Interpretation No. 505-, “Misleading Firm Names,” under Rule 505, Form of Organization and Name (AICPA
Published on June 11, 2012
Gifts Basis Document
Executive Summary:
...significant by the Professional Ethics Executive Committee (the Committee) in the development of two new ethics rulings, Ethics Ruling No. 113 – Acceptance or Offering of Gifts or Entertainment (AICPA, Professional Standards, vol. 2, ET sec. 191.226-.227) and Ethics Ruling No. 114
Published on April 19, 2010
FAQs and Case Studies For Network Firms
Case Study:
...following nonauthoritative frequently asked questions and sample case studies to assist members in understanding and implementing Interpretation No. 101-17, “Networks and Network Firms,” under Rule 101, Independence (AICPA, Professional Standards, ET sec. 101 par. .19), and related definitions. Such guidance does not
Published on August 30, 2011
Comment Letters For the September 23, 2011 Exposure Draft
Comment Letter:
Comments are requested by XXXX ##, 2011 for the September 23, 2011 exposure draft -proposed new interpretation .
Published on December 06, 2011
Comment Letters For the November 30, 2011 Exposure Draft
Article:
...Following are the comment letters received on the November 30, 2011 exposure draft of the Professional Ethics Division: 1. Marguerite I. Harkness, CPA 2. Professional Ethics Committee of the New York State Society of CPAs 3. Profes
Published on February 06, 2012