2013 Team and Review Captain Checklists
Checklist:
For Reviews Commencing on or after January 1, 2013: If you need materials for reviews commencing between January 1, 2013 and February 28, 2013, please download them from the January 2013 Practice Management Toolkits. For Reviews Commencing on or aft
Published on February 12, 2013
January 2013 Peer Review Program Manual
Checklist:
Download pdf files of some of the sections contained in the January 2013 Peer Review Program Manual. Other sections are contained in the Team and Review Captain Checklists area.
Published on April 11, 2013
2013 Peer Review Program Manual
Checklist:
Download pdf files of some of the sections contained in the 2013 Peer Review Program Manual. Other sections are contained in the Team and Review Captain Checklists area.
Published on April 03, 2013
2012 Peer Review Program Manual
Overview:
The Peer Review Manual is developed by the AICPA Peer Review Board and provides you with up-to-date standards, policies, procedures, checklists and programs to use when arranging, administering or carrying out a peer review. To keep it current, you will receive new or revised checklists and other materials due to
Published on April 11, 2013
Peer Review Service Organization Control (SOC) Specialist
Overview:
This page provides details about the AICPA Peer Review Service Organization Control (SOC) Specialist, including an application as well as a list of individuals approved as SOC 1 or 2 Specialists by the Peer Review Board Oversight Task Force.
Published on January 15, 2013
Peer Review Resources For The Public
Overview:
For the public provides links to the peer review summary, public file search feature and the firm search feature.
Published on April 11, 2013
How to Become a Peer Reviewer
Article:
Learn how to become a peer reviewer, a system review team captain or an engagement review captain
Published on February 22, 2013
Tips for Selecting Your AICPA Peer Review Program Peer Reviewer
Article:
The selection of the peer reviewer(s) is a critical step in ensuring that a firm's peer review is efficient, cost-effective, and adds value to the firm's quality control policies and procedures. Firms that approach this decision with due care are likely to receive the optimal benefits of the process.
Published on April 11, 2013