Budget
cutbacks. Whenever any
organizationespecially an NPO operating on
fund-raising dollars and volunteer
leadershipcuts back by reducing its paid
workforce, financial controls usually suffer.
Remaining employees or unpaid volunteers must
pick up the slack. This can lower morale and
increase the likelihood of fraud among unhappy
workers. High
turnover. When NPO volunteers and
employees turn over faster than elected positions
or job contracts dictate, it could be a sign
people are distressed by committing or witnessing
fraudulent activity or by being coerced into
participating in it. Many guilt-ridden,
frustrated bystanders or the fraudsters
themselves decide to leave an organization
altogether.
Refusal to take
legitimate perks. When employees or
volunteers are involved in an ongoing
embezzlement scheme, they often dont take
vacation time or offered promotions so they can
continue to hide their theft.
Overemphasis on
short-term fund-raising goals. When
board members, officers or executives become too
concerned with increasing contributions, they
often deemphasize internal controls and accurate
financial reporting, leaving room for fraudsters
to step in.
Poorly
monitored remote event or promotional locations. Fraud
often proliferates wherever supervision and
control are at a minimumsuch as during
major fund-raising events such as benefits. This
is particularly true when
organizationsacting without proper
accounting supervisionfail to create a
paper trail with prenumbered tickets, receipts
and the like. When cash is involved, its
always a challenge to determine who took how much
from the cash drawer after the fact.
Bounced checks.
If the NPOs board of
directors knows the organization has enough funds
to cover its expenditures and checks continue to
bounce, chances are good the entity may be a
victim of some kind of fraud.
Things
dont add up. If staff members
or volunteers are working on the
organizations books and things dont
make sense, CPAs need to take a closer look.
Employees or volunteers may be stealing payments
and diverting them to their accounts as they come
in.
Anonymous tips.
Fraud warnings can come in the form
of telephone messages or anonymous letters from
employees or volunteers. While they sometimes may
be frivolous and without merit, NPOs cant
afford to ignore them.
Lifestyle or
behavior changes. An obvious
discrepancy between an employees earnings
and how he or she lives can be a red flag for
fraud. If a persons behavior suddenly
changes, he or she may be under severe pressure
because of fraudulent activity.
Inattention to
details. An organization that
doesnt check account balances daily and
reconcile bank statements immediately is inviting
embezzlement. NPOs that dont employ other
controls, such as scanning paid bills for
possible overpayments, spot-checking financial
records without advance warning and reviewing
mail before it is opened, also are inviting
trouble.
Not conducting
background checks on anyone handling money. This
is especially true for volunteers, who NPOs
frequently dont scrutinize as closely as
employees.
Keeping
problems a secret. If an NPO
doesnt make a strong public statement about
fraudulent activities when it discovers them, it
leaves itself open to further violations by
others who think the act went unpunished or
unnoticed.
Failing to
investigate and then prosecute to the fullest
extent of the law. An organization
that doesnt conduct a full investigation to
understand the fraudsters methodology, the
total amount of the loss, how it occurred and how
to prevent it in the future can easily be
defrauded againin exactly the same way.
Where appropriate the NPO should contact
authorities and cooperate fully in a prosecution
so employees and volunteers understand fraudsters
will be punished.
Kyle Anne Midkiff, CPA,
CFE, is a principal at Nihill & Riedley PC, a
forensic accounting firm in Philadelphia, where
she has served on multiple nonprofit boards. Her
e-mail address is kmidkiff@nihillriedley.com.
|