When a funds manager factors taxes
into investment decisions,
investors should do better.
A Taxing Problem
BY PETER D.
FLEMING
| EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY |
- INCOME
TAXES CAN EAT UP A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION
of the investment return on an equity
mutual fund. For tax conscious investors,
tax-managed mutual funds offer a
relatively recent solution to this
problem. In 1998 the average tax-managed
fund lost only 1% of its return to taxes.
- A
TYPICAL EQUITY MUTUAL FUND HAS REALIZED
short-term gains and investment income
taxed at rates up to 39.6%; realized
long-term gains taxed at a maximum rate
of 20%; and unrealized gains that are not
currently taxed. A more tax-efficient
fund emphasizes long-term capital gains.
- THE
MANAGER OF A TAX-MANAGED FUND GENERALLY uses
a buy-and-hold strategy to emphasize
long-term gains over fully taxable
dividends and short-term gains. Some
tax-managed funds use hedging techniques
as an alternative to taxable sales.
- TAX-MANAGED
FUNDS HAVE SOME SPECIAL RISKS. The
funds are relatively new and have a
scanty track record. Tax-managed buying
and selling might conflict with the
managers style, reducing pretax
returns. A tax-efficient strategy may
require the fund to hold a security in a
down market.
- TAX-EFFICIENT
INVESTING ISNT FOR EVERYONE.
It works best for investors who have
already contributed the maximum amount to
IRAs or 401(k) plans, those seeking a
more-liquid alternative to variable
annuities or any investor who wants to
emphasize long-term appreciation over
currently taxable income and gains..
|
| PETER
D. FLEMING, CFP, is a senior editor with the Journal.
Mr. Fleming in an employee of the American
Institute of CPAs and his views, as expressed in
this article, do not necessarily reflect the
views of the AICPA. Official positions are
determined through specific committee procedures,
due process and deliberation. |
ach January millions of mutual fund
investors open their 1099s to face the grim news of how
much taxable income and gain they will have to report.
But in the past five years no new type of fund has
provided more good news for certain investors than
tax-managed mutual funds.
When
an investor holds mutual funds outside IRAs and other
tax-deferred retirement accounts, the cost of maintaining
such investments includes taxes as well as commissions
and management fees. Many mutual fund shareholders find
taxes on interest, dividends and realized gains are the
largest cost they face. With most distributions
reinvested in additional shares, investors have to dig
deep into their pockets to pay the tax bill.
| Tax-Efficient
Investing |
| In a 1999 report, Tax Managed Mutual
Funds and the Taxable Investor, KPMG looked
at the tax efficiency of mutual funds, the
advantages of managing an equity mutual fund for
aftertax returns and the impact tax efficiency
can have on net aftertax returns. KPMG found that
a long-term taxpaying investor can achieve higher
aftertax investment returns from a tax-managed
equity fund than from a conventional equity fund
managed without regard to tax
considerationsassuming the same level of
pretax returns. Copies of the study are
available from Eaton Vance Distributors by
calling 1-800-225-6265, ext. 8129 or e-mailing gmarshall@eatonvance.com.
|
Each year, fund sponsors introduce
hundreds of new mutual funds. (Today there are more than
10,000 funds in existence.) For tax conscious investors,
tax-managed mutual funds are one solution to the problem
of taxable mutual fund distributions. These funds seek to
invest in a way that will minimize taxes and maximize
long-term growth. With tax rates on net investment income
and realized short-term gains as high as 39.6% and
realized long-term gains taxed at a top rate of 20%,
investing in a tax-managed fund can help an investor
protect a substantial portion of his or her investment
return.
Although
there are fewer than 100 tax-managed mutual funds (see
exhibit 1 for a sampling), their stated goal of reducing
the impact of federal and state income taxes on fund
returns gives clients who already contribute the maximum
amount to tax-favored IRAs or 401(k) plans another
low-tax way to invest in the stock market.
| Exhibit 1: A Sample of
Tax-Managed Mutual Funds |
|
As CPAs try to keep pace with the
best investment vehicles to help clients realize their
goals, tax-managed mutual funds are an increasingly
important way clients can hold down taxes, leaving more
for retirement, college funding and other key objectives.
Here are some of the things CPAs will want to know about
tax-managed mutual funds before recommending that clients
add them to their portfolios.
LOW-TAX INVESTING
Tax-managed
mutual funds operate the way most other mutual funds do.
The difference is in how the funds are managed: Most fund
managers tend to sell stocks with the lowest cost
basisand the highest profitto boost returns,
but tax-managed fund managers follow a different
strategy, emphasizing aftertax returns.
The
aftertax return an investor earns from a mutual fund
investment is a function of four factors:
The investors own
tax circumstances (tax bracket, filing status).
The pretax returns the
fund earns.
The funds tax
efficiency.
The investors time
horizon.
Tax
efficiency is determined by the makeup of the funds
returns. A typical equity fund has realized short-term
gains and investment income that are taxed as ordinary
income (maximum rate, 39.6%); realized long-term gains
that are taxed at favorable capital gains rates (maximum
rate, 20%); and unrealized capital gains that are not
currently taxable. A tax-efficient fund has more
long-term capital gains and less investment income and
short-term gains.
To
avoid having to pay taxes at the fund level, a mutual
fund must distribute a minimum of 90% of its income (net
of fund expenses) and realized capital gains to
shareholders. An investor pays taxes on all
distributions, whether he or she elects to take them in
cash or reinvest them in additional shares. (For more on
the taxation of mutual fund distributions, see
Mutual Fund Tax Trap.)
| Mutual
Fund Tax Trap When a mutual
fund experiences net redemptions (shareholder
redemption requests exceed new investments), the
funds remaining shareholders may fall
victim to a potentially large tax
trap. The trap results from the tax
treatment the Internal Revenue Code affords
mutual funds and their shareholders.
IRC section 852(b)(3)A imposes a tax on the
excess, if any, of a funds net realized
capital gains over the deduction for capital
gains the fund distributes to shareholders. To
avoid this tax at the fund level, it is normal
industry practice for a fund to make a capital
gain distribution that is substantially equal to
its net realized capital gains. Mutual funds
normally make one such distribution per year,
usually around the end of the funds fiscal
year. Only shareholders who own the fund on the
record date receive the distribution.
After several years of investment growth, many
mutual funds have experienced substantial
appreciation in the value of their portfolio.
(CPAs can find information on a particular
funds unrealized gains in Morningstar.)
As a fund approaches yearend, it must distribute
all of the gains it was forced to realize to meet
shareholder redemption requests. Although this
distribution is taxable to the remaining
shareholders, the redeeming shareholders
recognize no tax consequences (other than any
gain or loss on the sale of their shares). The
redeeming shareholders not only force the fund to
liquidate securities and realize substantial
capital gains, but they shift the tax
consequences of this gain to the remaining
shareholders.
Most financial planners recommend that clients
focus on long-term goals and ignore short-term
market fluctuations. They typically advise
against attempting to time the
market. But as the above scenario illustrates,
this may not always be the best advice from a tax
perspective. When a client owns shares in a
mutual fund that is experiencing substantial net
redemptions and also has significant unrealized
appreciation, the potential exists for a large
tax liability. Financial planners may want to
recommend the client liquidate his or her
investment in such a fund before yearend to avoid
capital gain distributions.
Tax-wise financial planners know to advise a
client to avoid purchasing a mutual fund just
before it is due to make a capital gain
distribution. For clients considering investing
in a fund that has experienced large net
redemptions, that advice is even more astute. In
fact, it might be prudent for a planner to
anticipate the problem of potential capital gain
distributions from new mutual fund purchases much
earlier in the year, by keeping tabs on the
funds net redemptions.
Phyllis Bernstein,
CPA, director, AICPA
personal financial planning division
|
Taxes have a substantial negative
effect on mutual fund returns. For example, if an equity
fund returns 10% in a particular year, deriving 3% of
that return from dividends and short-term gains, 5% from
realized long-term gains and 2% from unrealized gains,
its return shrinks to only 7.8% after federal taxes, as
shown in exhibit 2. That means 22% of the funds
return has been lost to taxesbefore even
considering the impact of any state or local taxes. (In
high tax states such as New York or California investors
see their return shrink even more.) Although most mutual
fund managers pay little attention to how taxes can cut
into a funds return, tax-managed fund managers must
balance investment and tax considerations and evaluate
how their trading will affect a typical
shareholders tax liability.
| Exhibit 2: Impact of Taxes
on Fund Returns |
| |
Pretax
Returns |
Tax Rate |
Aftertax
Returns |
| Total return |
10.0% |
|
7.8% |
| Dividends and
short-term gains |
3.0% |
39.6% |
1.8% |
| Long-term gains |
5.0% |
20.0% |
4.0% |
| Unrealized gains |
2.0% |
0.0% |
2.0% |
|
A mutual funds turnover
ratehow frequently the fund manager buys and sells
securitieshas a substantial impact on an
investors aftertax return. Tax-managed funds
generally have low turnover rates. Since most fund
managers look to maximize pretax returns, they dont
even consider the tax impact of their trading frequency.
The result is that an investors aftertax returns
can be significantly lower than the funds
advertised pretax returns.
Lipper
Analytical Services, Inc., says the annual portfolio
turnover rate for the average equity fund is 86%; for the
average growth fund, the rate is 81%. A high turnover
rate means there is the potential for the fund to realize
more taxable gains. According to Morningstar, Inc., the
average diversified equity mutual fund gained 14.3% in
1998 and lost 12% of that return to taxes. In contrast,
the average tax-managed fund gained 21.57% in the same
period and lost only 1% to taxes.
MEASURING UP
Historically,
mutual fund performance has been measured by pretax
returns. But with approximately 60% of mutual funds in
taxable accounts, this may not be the best way to judge
true performance. With the tremendous stock market gains
in the latter part of the 1990s and after several years
of record mutual fund distributions, investors have
become more conscious of aftertax returns.
Despite
the option to follow tax-efficient strategies when
investing in individual stocks and bonds on their own,
many investors prefer the ease of mutual
fundsprofessional management, greater
diversification, improved liquidity. A tax-managed fund,
with a low turnover rate, can significantly increase
returns. As exhibit 3, below, illustrates, if a
high-bracket investor holds a high-turnover stock fund
for 30 years before selling it, a $25,000 investment
might grow to $187,888. However, if the same investor
uses a low-turnover fund, the same investment could grow
to $335,930.
| Exhibit 3: Tax-Managed vs.
Non-Tax-Managed Funds |
Assumptions:
- $25,000
investment.
- 10% annual
rate of return.
- 8% annual
turnover in buy-and-hold account.
- 81% annual
turnover in high-turnover
account.
- Taxes are paid
out of account each year, with
remaining income invested in
additional shares.
- After year
three, annual distributions are
assumed to be 50% ordinary income
and 50% long-term gains.
- 20% long-term
capital gain rate upon
redemption.
|
 |
| Source: State Street
Research, Boston. |
|
Even Congress is concerned that
high pretax returns may be overstated and potentially
misleading to investors. The House of Representatives is
considering a bill to require fund sponsors to make
improved disclosures. (See Congress Chimes
In, for more details.)
| Congress
Chimes In Congress is concerned
that mutual fund performance figures dont
give the true picture of the effect taxes have on
investor returns. In March 1999, Representative
Paul Gillmore (R-Ohio) introduced HR 1089, the
Mutual Fund Tax Awareness Act of 1999.
The bill expresses concern that
- The average mutual fund investor loses up
to 3% of a funds return to taxes
every year.
- Portfolio turnover has nearly tripled, to
almost 90%, from 30% 20 years ago.
- Average capital gain distributions from
growth funds have more than doubled in
the last 10 years.
The bills sponsors believe improved
disclosure of tax efficiency by mutual fund
companies would allow shareholders to compare
aftertax returns to raw performance and help them
determine if a fund manager tries to minimize
shareholder tax consequences.
If passed, the legislation would require the
SEC to revise regulations under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 mandating improved disclosure
methods in prospectuses and annual reports of the
aftertax effects of portfolio turnover on mutual
fund returns. Congress has held committee
hearings on the bill, but no formal action has
yet been taken.
|
SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, Jr.,
is also speaking out on the tax implications of mutual
fund investing. Many investors lack a clear
understanding of the impact taxes have on their mutual
fund returns, he says. In a February speech before
the Mutual Fund Directors Education Council, Levitt cited
the estimated $34 billion that stock and bond fund
shareholders paid in taxes on fund distributions in 1997.
On March 15 the SEC issued proposed rules requiring
companies to disclose aftertax returns in fund
prospectuses. Funds would not be required to include
aftertax returns in advertising or other sales materials.
The deadline for commenting on the proposed
rulesavailable at www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/33-7809.htmis June 30.
THE RIGHT STRATEGY
How
does the manager of a tax-managed fund go about
minimizing taxes? For example, here are some techniques
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Emerging Growth Fund says it uses
to achieve tax-efficient management. The fund
Invests primarily in
lower-yielding growth stocks.
Employs a long-term
approach to investing.
Tries to avoid net
realized short-term gains.
When appropriate, sells
stocks trading below their tax cost (basis) to
realize losses.
When selling appreciated
stock, it selects the most tax-favored share lots
(those with the highest cost basis).
Selectively uses
tax-advantaged hedging techniques as an
alternative to taxable sales.
Other
funds employ similar strategies. State Street Research
Legacy Fund uses what it calls a buy-and-hold approach to
allow the fund to focus on long-term capital appreciation
while reducingalthough not eliminatingtaxable
capital gains distributions. The T. Rowe Price
Tax-Efficient Balanced Fund adds tax-free municipal bonds
to the mix. Its objective is to provide investors with
attractive long-term returns on an aftertax
basis with a balanced portfolio of stocks and municipal
bonds. The fund invests a minimum of 50% of its total
assets in tax-exempt securities.
Because
large unexpected redemptions could disrupt this
buy-and-hold strategy, some tax-managed funds impose a
redemption penalty to discourage investors from making
large withdrawals that might force management to sell
securities to raise cash.
RISK AND RETURN
As
with any investment strategy, tax-efficient investing
carries risks as well as rewards. In evaluating
tax-managed mutual funds for their clients, CPAs should
use the same criteria they would use to judge any other
fund, including
The track record,
background and experience of the fund manager.
Internal fund expenses.
Fund performance history.
Risk relative to the
funds peer group.
Style consistency. (Does
the portfolio stick with its selected style?)
There
are, however, some special risks associated with
tax-managed funds that CPAs should consider:
Tax-managed funds are
relatively new, and many have little or no track
record investors can use to judge performance,
risk and other factors.
Tax-managed buying and
selling might conflict with the managers
style, reducing pretax returns.
Over time, a tax-managed
fund may accumulate a large portfolio of
unrealized gains. Investors in such funds face
the risk the fund will decide to realize some or
all of these gains and pass them through to
shareholders.
Tax-managed funds
frequently use various hedging strategies to
protect gains instead of selling shares. These
strategies leave the fund open to large potential
losses.
The funds long-term
investment strategy may require it to hold a
security in a down market when stock prices are
declining.
Its
also important to remember that an investor who
doesnt pay Uncle Sam now is likely to have to pay
later. Many tax-managed funds achieve their returns
through unrealized capital gains, which means the value
of the funds shares continues to grow. When an
investor decides to sell his or her shares, the gain on
disposal could be much higher than it might be with a
mutual fund that had distributed its gains over time.
Still, depending on the investors holding period,
the gain on sale is likely to be taxed at favorable
long-term capital gain rates. Such a scenario also puts
the investor in the drivers seat; he or she decides
when to realize and pay taxes on capital gains, rather
than the fund manager.
WHO ARE THEY GOOD FOR?
Tax-efficient
investing isnt good, or even necessary, for
everyone. Low-bracket taxpayers generally will do better
investing in more conventional mutual funds, since taxes
arent a big concern. Tax-deferred retirement
accounts also are likely to obtain higher returns from
other kinds of funds since they dont pay taxes
currently. There are, however, some clients a CPA will
find particularly suited to tax-managed mutual funds,
including
Tax-conscious investors
who already have contributed the maximum amount
to IRAs, Keoghs or 401(k) plans, or those who
arent eligible to contribute.
Investors seeking a
flexible, more-liquid alternative to variable
annuities.
Irrevocable trusts looking
for capital appreciation with minimal tax
consequences.
Those seeking funding
vehicles for money transferred to children under
the Uniform Transfer to Minors Act, where income
earned by children under age 14 is generally
taxable at the parents tax bracket.
Any investors who want
less taxable income, such as an older client
seeking to lower his or her investment income and
thereby minimize the amount of Social Security
benefits subject to tax.
TAX-MANAGED, NOT TAX-FREE
When
recommending tax-managed mutual funds to clients,
its important that CPAs make sure clients
understand that tax-managed does not mean tax-free. The
funds seek to minimize taxes, not eliminate them. With
the stock market still providing the potential for
substantial gains, few investors can afford to overlook
the fact that taxes reduce their mutual fund returns, and
tax-managed funds provide one solution to a vexing
problem. Some investors, however, still havent
gotten the message. A July 1999 Mutual Fund Magazine survey
found that taxes arent a concern for most mutual
fund investors. In the poll, only one in eight investors
put taxes near the top of a list of important
considerations in judging a mutual funds appeal. As
a result, CPAs may find they have to save these clients
from themselves by educating them about the impact taxes
can have on mutual fund returns. If the growing number of
tax-managed funds is any indication, more and more
clients are getting the message every day.
| Keeping
More Money in Shareholders Pockets For
Armin J. Lang, vice-president and portfolio
manager of Eaton Vances Tax-Managed
International Growth Fund, tax-managed investing
is a 24-hour-a-day job. Because the fund
concentrates on overseas companies, Lang must
work when the global markets are open. Sometimes,
he says, it seems as though my office is my
home.
In Langs mind, the essence of
tax-managed investing is fairly simple: You
want to make sure the money ends up where it
belongsin the shareholders pocket.
From what Ive seen recently, more and more
mutual fund investors end up giving money at the
end of the year to their least favorite charity,
Uncle Sam. And that, Lang says, is
something he tries to avoid by any means.
If you look at the capital gains
distribution of our tax-managed equity fund, it
is zero, was zero and will be zero. That means
the shareholder gets to keep all of the money he
or she deserves.
Lang says tax-managed investing in an
international environment is much the same as it
is domestically. Theres virtually no
difference. It comes down to the same
characteristics. You want to be a long-term
investor, and that holds true for both U.S. and
international equities.
When asked about the difficulties of
tax-efficient investing, Lang says it helps to
have a strong investment philosophy. My
philosophy is very much long-term. If I buy a
stock today, I expect to hold it for at least
five years, if not more. If you look at the
average portfolio manager, international or
domestic, I dont think theres anyone
who has a five-year time horizon. The
bottom line, Lang says, is the difference
between buying companies and trading
stocks.
Lang is bullish on the long-term prospects for
tax-managed investing. Five years from now,
Im convinced no one will look exclusively
at pretax returns. Everyone will look at aftertax
returns, even in funds that arent
necessarily managed with that goal. Lang
goes so far as to predict that fund sponsors will
offer qualified and nonqualified mutual funds,
with the latter managed to be more tax efficient.
And he points out that the SEC is on the
case following Chairman Arthur Levitt
Jr.s February comments promising stricter
disclosure of aftertax returns.
In looking to the future, Lang offers this
example: When you receive your paycheck,
you dont just look at the top line number,
you look at the bottom line, your take-home pay.
Thats exactly whats going to happen
with mutual funds. If you own a fund that returns
45% and you check the bottom line and see the
aftertax return is also 45%, youre happy.
If you have another fund that returns 15% and
after paying taxes on capital gain distributions
the bottom line is that the fund returns only 5%,
you know you have a problem. This will lead
investors to tax-managed funds.
Over the last five years, Lang says, investors
have had the benefit of decent stock market
returns. He cites an investor in a domestic
equity fund that returns 20%. If you give
up 250 basis points of that return to taxes, at
least youll still have 17.5% left. In
the next five years, Lang says, market gains
might be flat and investors wont be so
lucky. You may look at your 1099 and see
the return on your fund was 0, but you still have
to pay the tax man. Thats when the idea of
mutual funds that are managed for people who pay
taxes will really take off.
|
|