AICPA RSS
x
Username

Password

Federal Issues

XBRL 

The AICPA supports the use of Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), or data tagging, for reporting of financial and other data. The Institute believes that users of financial and other business information benefit from data tagging because interactive data allows for easier access to more transparent information.

Both the private and public sectors are working toward implementing XBRL for financial information. The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules in February 2009 requiring public companies to submit financial statements filed in XBRL format including annual and quarterly reports, registration statements and transition reports. Using a phased-in approach based upon market capitalization, as of 2011, all SEC filers that use U.S. generally accepting accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and foreign issuers that use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are required to submit their reports to the SEC using XBRL.  The FDIC also requires bank call reports to be filed using XBRL.

Legislative Proposals

112th Congress

XBRL is gaining support in Congress as evidenced by the number of bills containing XBRL provisions.  One such bill has been signed into law and several others have been introduced or are expected to be introduced.

Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act Enacted with XBRL Provision

The “Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act” was enacted on September 30, 2011 after quick consideration and passage in both the House and Senate.  Congressmen Geoff Davis, a Kentucky Republican, and Lloyd Doggett, a Texas Democrat, introduced an early version of the legislation in July 2011.  That bill was re-introduced as H.R. 2883 in September, and Senators Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat, and Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, introduced an identical bill, S. 1542.  The primary purpose of the legislation is to extend child and family services programs.  Additionally, it calls for data standardization, and specifically requires the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Management and Budget to work to establish non-proprietary data standards, such as XBRL, for reporting of information for improved data matching.  The bill passed the House of Representatives on September 21, passed the Senate on September 22, and was signed by President Obama on September 30, 2011.

Digital Accountability and Transparency Act

The House overwhelming passed the “Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2011” or “DATA Act”, H.R. 2146, in April 2012. Championed by Congressman Darrell Issa, a California Republican, this bill includes a provision to require a newly-created Financial Accountability and Spending Transparency (FAST) Commission to collect information from Federal agencies, as well as from recipients of federal grants, contracts and loans. It further requires the FAST Commission to designate common data elements and data reporting requirements for the information it is provided by recipients and agencies. The legislation specifies XBRL as one possible data reporting language that should be considered to meet the requirement.

The AICPA supported the bill's requirements to use non-proprietary data standards, such as XBRL, for reporting.

Senators Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, and Rob Portman, an Ohio Republican, introduced a different version of the DATA Act, S. 3600, in September 2012.  Senator Warner had previously introduced S. 1222, which was identical to the original House bill.  Unlike the House bill, the new Senate version requires federal agencies to report their spending, but does not require reporting from recipients of federal funds.  Additionally, S. 3600 does not specifically mention XBRL, but requires the Secretary of the Treasury to “establish Government-wide financial data standards for Federal funds” and further specifies that those standards “may…include data reporting standards that, to the extent practicable, incorporate a widely-accepted, nonproprietary, searchable, platform-independent computer-readable format” that are “…in effect on the date of enactment of the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act.” 

Because the AICPA believes that XBRL is the best possible data standard that is currently available, the Institute is advocating for modifications to the bill to ensure that the legislative language calls for an appropriate non-proprietary data standard, such as XBRL, to be selected when the bill is enacted.  The AICPA sent a letter to Senators Warner and Portman thanking them "for their leadership in promoting new technologies that will allow users to better understand and compare reported financial information" and asking that they consider making modifications to the legislation when they reintroduce their bill in the 113th Congress in 2013.

Standard DATA Act

Congressmen Davis and Doggett have also introduced H.R. 3339, the “Standard Data and Technology Advancement Act” or “Standard DATA Act”.  This bill would require that the Office of Management and Budget establish an interagency work group to designate nonproprietary data standards, such as XBRL, for any information reported under a number of health and human services  programs (amends Social Security Act titles III, IV, IX, XII, XVI, subtitle A of title XX, and section 511).  There was no action on this bill in the 112th Congress and it will need to be reintroduced for its proposals to be considered in the 113th Congress.

JOBS Act

Additionally, Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, and Congressman Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican, each introduced bills entitled the “Jobs, Opportunity, Benefits and Services (JOBS) Act of 2011” (S. 904 and H.R. 1745).  Each of these bills include a provision requiring the Department of Labor to work with the Federal Office of Management and Budget and the states to designate data reporting standards to govern the reporting required under Titles III and IX of the Social Security Act.  The bills state, “In designating reporting standards under this subsection, the Secretary of Labor shall, to the extent practicable, incorporate existing nonproprietary standards, such as the eXtensible Business Reporting Language.” There was no action on this bill in the 112th Congress and it will need to be reintroduced for its proposals to be considered in the 113th Congress.

Other legislation expected in the future

Congressman Issa has indicated that he intends to reintroduce a version of H.R. 6038, the “Financial Industry Transparency Act” that he had sponsored in the 111th Congress.  More information on that bill is below.

Importantly, inclusion of XBRL in each of these legislative proposals indicates that there is growing support for this non-proprietary data tagging language for making financial information more transparent.

111th Congress Legislative Initiatives

In the 111th Congress, there were several proposals calling for XBRL reporting. None of these initiatives had passed both the House and Senate by the time Congress adjourned in December 2010, so new bills would need to be introduced in order to initiate any new Congressional action.

H.R. 2392, the “Government Information Transparency Act,” passed the House in December 2009. It requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to “adopt a single data standard for: (1) collection, analysis, and dissemination of business and financial information for use by private sector entities in accordance with this Act for information required to be reported to the federal government; and (2) use by agencies for federal financial information.” There was no similar bill in the Senate.

The House-passed version of the financial regulatory reform bill, H.R. 4173, would have required that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) give oral testimony to the House Financial Services Committee for each of the next five years “on their efforts to reduce the complexity in financial reporting to provide more accurate and clear financial information to investors, including… encouraging the use and acceptance of interactive data.” The Senate did not take up any sort of interactive data reporting requirements during consideration of the financial regulatory reform legislation.  Congressman Darrell Issa, a California Republican, introduced a series of amendments dealing with requiring financial data standards to improve transparency of information received by various banking regulators and the SEC during the House-Senate conference in June.  Those amendments were agreed to by House conferees, but dropped by the Senate conferees. 

In July, Congressman Issa introduced H.R. 6038, the "Financial Industry Transparency Act," which mirrors the language considered during the House-Senate conference.  Mr. Issa worked toward passage of this bill in late 2010, but it did not gain Congressional approval.  Importantly, the bill had original co-sponsorship support from then-Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Edolphus Towns, a New York Democrat, and then-Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Spencer Bachus, an Alabama Republican. The AICPA wrote a letter in support of H.R. 6038, linked here.

Another bill which passed in different forms in the House and the Senate, was the “Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 2009,” (referred to as S. 303 in both chambers) introduced by Senator George Voinovich, an Ohio Democrat. The bill would have required OMB to “to establish and maintain a public website that serves as a central point of information and access for federal grant applicants.” The House version of the bill was even more explicit, and required OMB to “adopt a single data standard for the collection, analysis, and dissemination of business and financial information for use by private sector entities in accordance with subsection 12 (b) for information required to be reported to the Federal Government, and a single data standard for use by agencies within the Federal Government in accordance with subsection (c) for Federal financial information.” It further required that the data standards “shall be a widely accepted, non-proprietary, searchable, computer-readable format for business and financial data.”

Resources

Copy of Legislation


Copies of bills are available on the Library of Congress’s THOMAS website. The bills, and all Congressional actions, are available by searching for the legislation by bill number.

AICPA Letters and Issue Papers

December 18, 2012 Letter in Support of the Data Standards Provisions of S. 3600, the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act"

September 20, 2011 AICPA Letter in Support of H.R. 2883, the "Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act"

September 20, 2011 AICPA Letter in Support of S. 1542, the "Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act"

AICPA Issue Paper Supporting H.R. 2146 and S. 1222: the "Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2011"

June 20, 2011 AICPA Letter in Support of H.R. 2146, the "Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2011"

September 17, 2010 AICPA Letter in Support of H.R. 6038, the "Financial Industry Transparency Act" 

April 9, 2009 AICPA Comment Letter to the SEC on the Proposed Roadmap to U.S. Adoption of IFRS 

AICPA Press Releases


January 15, 2010, AICPA Webcast to Guide Public Companies on Furnishing XBRL Data to SEC

December 17, 2009, U.S. SEC Releases Final Rule Mandating Companies to Report Financial Statements Using XBRL, Interactive Data Format

October 20, 2008, AICPA Hails New Framework by WICI for Enhanced Business Reporting

Staff Contacts

Diana Huntress Deem
Director, Congressional and Political Affairs
ddeem@aicpa.org
202.434.9276

Other Web Resources

XRBL.US

SEC XBRL Website: XBRL.SEC.GOV

SEC Final XBRL Rule, February 3, 2009

XRBL International

Open Hide documents in this section

Page  1 2 3 4 5 >> 
Showing results 1 - 15 of 93
Order by:


Audits of FHA-Approved Participants and Related HUD Requirements

Article FHA proposes new rule to strengthen risk management and shift accountability for the underwriting of FHA-insured loans to the mortgage banks. It may no longer require FHA to approve loan correspondents (mortgage brokers) participating in the FHA program and HUD would no longer require FHA to submit audited financial statements or audits
Published on May 14, 2013

Municipal Advisors

Article The AICPA generally supports the SEC’s proposed rules as a means to strengthen investor protections in the municipal securities market.  The AICPA is concerned, however, because the proposed rule would require that accountants performing customary and usual accounting services would be required to register as municipal advisors.
Published on May 01, 2013

Congressional and Political Affairs Advocacy

Overview The AICPA monitors and advocates on legislative and other matters that affect the accounting profession. Working with state CPA societies and other professional organizations, the AICPA provides information to and educates federal, state and local policymakers regarding key issues.
Published on May 01, 2013

Convergence of International and US Accounting Principles and IFRS

Article International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) set by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in London is a response to worldwide demand from regulators, investors, businesses, and auditing firms for a single set of high-quality, globally-accepted accounting standards.
Published on April 03, 2013

Tax Legislation and Policy

Article The Congressional and Political Affairs Team often assists the Tax Team with tax legislation and policy issues, and advocates about them to Members of Congress and other key policymakers on behalf of the profession.
Published on April 03, 2013

Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Article The Sarbanes Oxley Act requires that the management of public companies assess the effectiveness of the internal control of issuers for financial reporting.  Section 404(b) requires a publicly-held company’s auditor to attest to, and report on, management’s assessment of its internal controls. AICPA believes that all investors in public companies
Published on April 03, 2013

GAO Study of Financial Planning

Federal Law Dodd-Frank required the GAO to conduct a study on the effectiveness of existing regulation of financial planners, including tax advisors.  The AICPA met with the GAO during the study to present the profession’s point of view.  AICPA strongly opposed any new regulatory structure affecting CPAs as they are already comprehensively
Published on April 03, 2013

Financial Literacy and Education

Article Learn about the AICPA's award winning financial literacy programs.
Published on April 03, 2013

FASB Independence and Fair Value Accounting

Article The AICPA strongly and unequivocally supports independence of the U.S. and international accounting standard setting bodies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in Norwalk, Connecticut, and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in London.
Published on April 03, 2013

Extraterritorial Private Rights of Action, also known as F-Cubed Litigation

Article The accounting profession believes private litigants may utilize U.S. securities laws within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. and that the United States Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd. is the correct reading of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Published on April 03, 2013

ERISA Fiduciary Definition - Appraisers of Employee Stock Ownership Plans

Article The AICPA believes that CPAs who perform valuation services for employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) should not be defined as fiduciaries under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Rather, the AICPA believes that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) should implement rules that would require appraisers of ESOPs to
Published on April 03, 2013

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Article This article outlines the AICPA's involvement with the development of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The AICPA was successful in winning recognition by House and Senate lawmakers of the vital role CPAs play in advising Americans on their financial decisions, thus preventing CPAs from reporting to a new regulatory body.
Published on April 03, 2013

Federal Legislative and Regulatory Issues

Federal Law This page highlights the advocacy issues in which the Congressional & Political Affairs Team is advocating on behalf of the profession, and also those issues that the team has recently followed.
Published on March 29, 2013

Tax Legislation and Policy - Recent Issues

Overview See current tax issues and legistlation that the AICPA recently followed. The Congressional and Political Affairs Team often assists the Tax Team with tax legislation and policy issues, and advocates about them to Members of Congress and other key policymakers on behalf of the profession.
Published on March 28, 2013

Audits of Federal Funds (Single Audits)

Article Entities that receive federal funds including states, local governments, and not-for-profit organizations (NPOs), are subject to audit requirements commonly referred to as “single audits” under the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended in 1996.  The Single Audit Act was enacted to standardize the requirements for auditing federal programs. 
Published on March 28, 2013

Page  1 2 3 4 5 >> 
Showing results 1 – 15 of 93
Show Results per page
Copyright © 2006-2013 American Institute of CPAs.