AICPA RSS
x
Username

Password

Federal Issues

Audits of Federal Funds (Single Audits) 

Entities that receive federal funds including states, local governments, and not-for-profit organizations (NPOs), are subject to audit requirements commonly referred to as “single audits” under the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended in 1996.  The Single Audit Act was enacted to standardize the requirements for auditing federal programs.  The Act provides that grantees are subject to one audit of all of their federal programs versus separate audits of each federal program, hence the term “single audit.”  The AICPA believes that single audits should be performed in a high-quality manner, using appropriate professional standards, and provides guidance to its members through its Governmental Audit Quality Center and through other means such as technical publications, guidance, educational courses, and conferences.

Legislative Proposals

112th Congress

In November 2011, Representative James Lankford, an Oklahoma Republican, introduced the "Grant Reform and New Transparency Act" or GRANT Act, H.R. 3433.  While the primary purpose of the bill is to improve transparency in the grant application, award and reporting processes, it also calls for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to submit a plan for improving the single audit process.  Such a plan would have to include, among other things, a simplified single audit alternative for non-federal entities with expenditures for smaller federal awards. The legislation defines a "smaller Federal award" as $1 million or less. 

Because the Single Audit Act currently bases its audit requirement on total federal awards expended of $500,000 or more, the AICPA is concerned that the bill’s language is inconsistent because it implies that an audit would only be required when there is one federal award greater than $1 million.  As a result, the AICPA has advocated that the bill be clarified that the simplified audit alternative be explored for recipients expending greater than $1 million in total federal awards.

The bill was favorably reported to the full House by the Oversight and Government Reform Committee in May 2012.  The bill saw no further action in 2012.

Earlier Legislative Proposals and Executive Branch Actions

The federal funds provided to governments and NPOs subject to single audits have been significantly increased (by approximately $800 billion) due to the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), which was intended to stimulate the economy and create jobs. 

Representative Edolphus Towns, a New York Democrat,  introduced H.R. 2182 to require 0.5 percent of Recovery Act funds be allocated to conduct oversight to prevent waste, fraud and abuse.  The bill passed the House in May 2009. There was no action on the bill in the Senate, and it died with end of the 111th Congress.  It also has not been reintroduced in this Congress which began its term in January 2011.

Additionally, President Obama issued Executive Order 13520 on Nov. 23, 2009, creating a working group of federal, state and local officials to recommend improvements that could be made to single audits, including determining whether such audits are effective in identifying improper payments and whether single audit requirements should be streamlined or eliminated where their value is minimal.  In March 2010, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued government-wide guidance to the federal agencies (found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-13.pdf) on the implementation of the Executive Order. Under OMB’s guidance, which affects OMB Circular A-123, Management’s Responsibility for Internal Control, federal agencies with programs susceptible to significant improper payments are required to submit a quarterly report on any identified high-dollar overpayments to the agency’s Inspector General and the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, and also make the report available to the public. Additionally, OMB continues to study the inter-relationship of single audits and the required federal agency reporting of improper payments and whether any changes are needed to single audit legislation or regulation as a result of its study.

Copy of Legislation

Copies of bills and all Congressional actions are available on the Library of Congress’s THOMAS website by bill number after first selecting "Try the Advanced Search" and then the correct Congress.

AICPA Testimony

October 25, 2007 AICPA Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services and International Security (linked here and at Senate hearing of same day below).

Links to Congressional Hearings

November 19, 2009 House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing, Tracking the Money:  How Recovery Act Recipients Account for Their Use of Stimulus Dollars

September 10, 2009 Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Hearing, Follow the Money: An Update on Stimulus Spending

July 8, 2009 House Oversight and Government Reform Hearing, Tracking the Money:  Preventing Waste, Fraud and Abuse of Recovery Act Funding 

October 25, 2007 Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services and International Security Hearing, Single Audits:  Are They Helping to Safeguard Federal Funds

Links to Other Documents

November 20, 2009 Executive Order, Reducing Improper Payment and Eliminating Waste in Federal Programs

March 13, 2009 Government Accountability Office Report, Single Audit: Opportunities Exist to Improve the Single Audit Process and Oversight

June 2007 President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency and Executive Council on Integrity and Efficiency, Report on National Single Audit Sampling Project (report of results of Federal Single Audit Quality Study)

Staff Contacts

Diana Huntress Deem
Director, Congressional and Political Affairs
ddeem@aicpa.org
202.434.9276

Mary Foelster
Director, Governmental Auditing and Accounting
mfoelster@aicpa.org
202.434.9259

Open Hide documents in this section

Page  1 2 3 4 5 >> 
Showing results 1 - 15 of 93
Order by:


Audits of FHA-Approved Participants and Related HUD Requirements

Article FHA proposes new rule to strengthen risk management and shift accountability for the underwriting of FHA-insured loans to the mortgage banks. It may no longer require FHA to approve loan correspondents (mortgage brokers) participating in the FHA program and HUD would no longer require FHA to submit audited financial statements or audits
Published on May 14, 2013

Municipal Advisors

Article The AICPA generally supports the SEC’s proposed rules as a means to strengthen investor protections in the municipal securities market.  The AICPA is concerned, however, because the proposed rule would require that accountants performing customary and usual accounting services would be required to register as municipal advisors.
Published on May 01, 2013

Congressional and Political Affairs Advocacy

Overview The AICPA monitors and advocates on legislative and other matters that affect the accounting profession. Working with state CPA societies and other professional organizations, the AICPA provides information to and educates federal, state and local policymakers regarding key issues.
Published on May 01, 2013

Convergence of International and US Accounting Principles and IFRS

Article International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) set by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in London is a response to worldwide demand from regulators, investors, businesses, and auditing firms for a single set of high-quality, globally-accepted accounting standards.
Published on April 03, 2013

Tax Legislation and Policy

Article The Congressional and Political Affairs Team often assists the Tax Team with tax legislation and policy issues, and advocates about them to Members of Congress and other key policymakers on behalf of the profession.
Published on April 03, 2013

Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Article The Sarbanes Oxley Act requires that the management of public companies assess the effectiveness of the internal control of issuers for financial reporting.  Section 404(b) requires a publicly-held company’s auditor to attest to, and report on, management’s assessment of its internal controls. AICPA believes that all investors in public companies
Published on April 03, 2013

GAO Study of Financial Planning

Federal Law Dodd-Frank required the GAO to conduct a study on the effectiveness of existing regulation of financial planners, including tax advisors.  The AICPA met with the GAO during the study to present the profession’s point of view.  AICPA strongly opposed any new regulatory structure affecting CPAs as they are already comprehensively
Published on April 03, 2013

Financial Literacy and Education

Article Learn about the AICPA's award winning financial literacy programs.
Published on April 03, 2013

FASB Independence and Fair Value Accounting

Article The AICPA strongly and unequivocally supports independence of the U.S. and international accounting standard setting bodies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in Norwalk, Connecticut, and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in London.
Published on April 03, 2013

Extraterritorial Private Rights of Action, also known as F-Cubed Litigation

Article The accounting profession believes private litigants may utilize U.S. securities laws within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. and that the United States Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd. is the correct reading of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Published on April 03, 2013

ERISA Fiduciary Definition - Appraisers of Employee Stock Ownership Plans

Article The AICPA believes that CPAs who perform valuation services for employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) should not be defined as fiduciaries under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Rather, the AICPA believes that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) should implement rules that would require appraisers of ESOPs to
Published on April 03, 2013

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Article This article outlines the AICPA's involvement with the development of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The AICPA was successful in winning recognition by House and Senate lawmakers of the vital role CPAs play in advising Americans on their financial decisions, thus preventing CPAs from reporting to a new regulatory body.
Published on April 03, 2013

Federal Legislative and Regulatory Issues

Federal Law This page highlights the advocacy issues in which the Congressional & Political Affairs Team is advocating on behalf of the profession, and also those issues that the team has recently followed.
Published on March 29, 2013

Tax Legislation and Policy - Recent Issues

Overview See current tax issues and legistlation that the AICPA recently followed. The Congressional and Political Affairs Team often assists the Tax Team with tax legislation and policy issues, and advocates about them to Members of Congress and other key policymakers on behalf of the profession.
Published on March 28, 2013

Audits of Federal Funds (Single Audits)

Article Entities that receive federal funds including states, local governments, and not-for-profit organizations (NPOs), are subject to audit requirements commonly referred to as “single audits” under the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended in 1996.  The Single Audit Act was enacted to standardize the requirements for auditing federal programs. 
Published on March 28, 2013

Page  1 2 3 4 5 >> 
Showing results 1 – 15 of 93
Show Results per page
Copyright © 2006-2013 American Institute of CPAs.