AICPA RSS
x
Username

Password

Federal Issues

GAO Study of Financial Planning 

AICPA strongly opposes any moves to create a federal regulator for all financial planners.  CPAs are already comprehensively and appropriately regulated by State Boards of Accountancy and the IRS with regard to all financial planning activities.  An additional layer of regulation would be redundant and unnecessary.

A provision authorizing a study by the General Accountability Office of the possible need for a financial planning regulatory agency is included in the "Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act," as enacted on July 21, 2010.

Background

The CFP Board, Financial Planning Association and the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors have organized as the Financial Planning Coalition with the objective of having financial planning services subject to comprehensive federal regulation and having financial planning recognized as a legitimate and accepted profession.  Their stated goal is to subject everyone who offers “financial planning advice” (broadly defined to include those who, among other things, offer financial planning, tax planning and investment advice) to a fiduciary standard and regulation by an SRO.

Barry Melancon has met with Kevin Keller, CEO of the CFP Board, and AICPA staff has met with staff from each of the three organizations on these issues.

Legislative Action

As part of the House Financial Services Committee’s consideration of bills to make changes to the financial regulatory framework, the Committee marked up the “Investor Protection Act of 2009,” H.R. 3817.  The Financial Planning Coalition met with Congressman Michael Capuano, a Massachusetts Democrat, regarding a potential amendment during the committee consideration of the Investor Protection Act that would create such a federal regulator.  The AICPA and a number of other interested parties also met with the Congressman during the committee meeting to express concern.  Congressman Capuano decided not to introduce his amendment.  Instead, he offered an amendment that provides for a GAO study to be conducted on the regulation and oversight of financial planning.  This provision was included in the “Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009,” H.R. 4173, as passed by the House of Representatives.

The Financial Planning Coalition also met with Senator Herb Kohl, a Wisconsin Democrat, regarding a potential amendment to create a federal regulatory framework for financial planners.  As in the House, AICPA and other interested parties met with the Senator to express concern.  Senator Kohl did not introduce the amendment requested by the Financial Planning Coalition, but instead offered an amendment for a financial planning study similar to the one in the House-passed bill.  This language was included in the "Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010," S. 3217 as passed by the Senate.

GAO Study

The AICPA has met with the GAO on its study of financial planning to present the profession's point of view. The GAO released its study on January 24, 2011, entitled “Consumer Finance:  Regulatory Structure for Financial Planners Is Generally Comprehensive, but Consumer Protection Issues Remain."  The report summarizes the findings of the GAO’s study on the regulation of financial planning and lays forth their recommendations. The GAO essentially says that additional financial planning regulation or oversight would be duplicative. 

An excerpt of the GAO’s conclusion (from page 37 of the report) is below:

“Existing statutes and regulations appear to cover the great majority of financial planning services,and individual financial planners nearly always fall under one or more regulatory regimes, depending on their activities. While no single law governs the broad array of activities in which financial planners may engage, given available information, it does not appear that an additional layer of regulation specific to financial planners is warranted at this time. At the same time, as we have previously reported, more robust enforcement of existing laws could strengthen consumer protection issues associated with the oversight of financial planners.”

The AICPA believes that Congress has accepted the conclusions of the report and will not act to add additional regulation on financial planners.

GAO Report

The January 24,2011 GAO report can be accessed through this link.

Copy of Legislation

A copy of the law is available on the Library of Congress's THOMAS website.  The law and all major Congressional actions leading to passage are available by using the advanced search function and searching for H.R. 4173 by bill number under the 111th Congress.  H.R. 3817 and S. 3217 are also available on THOMAS.

Staff Contact

Peter Kravitz
Director – Congressional and Political Affairs
202-434-2918
pkravitz@aicpa.org

Open Hide documents in this section

Page  1 2 3 4 5 >> 
Showing results 1 - 15 of 93
Order by:


Audits of FHA-Approved Participants and Related HUD Requirements

Article FHA proposes new rule to strengthen risk management and shift accountability for the underwriting of FHA-insured loans to the mortgage banks. It may no longer require FHA to approve loan correspondents (mortgage brokers) participating in the FHA program and HUD would no longer require FHA to submit audited financial statements or audits
Published on May 14, 2013

Municipal Advisors

Article The AICPA generally supports the SEC’s proposed rules as a means to strengthen investor protections in the municipal securities market.  The AICPA is concerned, however, because the proposed rule would require that accountants performing customary and usual accounting services would be required to register as municipal advisors.
Published on May 01, 2013

Congressional and Political Affairs Advocacy

Overview The AICPA monitors and advocates on legislative and other matters that affect the accounting profession. Working with state CPA societies and other professional organizations, the AICPA provides information to and educates federal, state and local policymakers regarding key issues.
Published on May 01, 2013

Convergence of International and US Accounting Principles and IFRS

Article International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) set by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in London is a response to worldwide demand from regulators, investors, businesses, and auditing firms for a single set of high-quality, globally-accepted accounting standards.
Published on April 03, 2013

Tax Legislation and Policy

Article The Congressional and Political Affairs Team often assists the Tax Team with tax legislation and policy issues, and advocates about them to Members of Congress and other key policymakers on behalf of the profession.
Published on April 03, 2013

Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Article The Sarbanes Oxley Act requires that the management of public companies assess the effectiveness of the internal control of issuers for financial reporting.  Section 404(b) requires a publicly-held company’s auditor to attest to, and report on, management’s assessment of its internal controls. AICPA believes that all investors in public companies
Published on April 03, 2013

GAO Study of Financial Planning

Federal Law Dodd-Frank required the GAO to conduct a study on the effectiveness of existing regulation of financial planners, including tax advisors.  The AICPA met with the GAO during the study to present the profession’s point of view.  AICPA strongly opposed any new regulatory structure affecting CPAs as they are already comprehensively
Published on April 03, 2013

Financial Literacy and Education

Article Learn about the AICPA's award winning financial literacy programs.
Published on April 03, 2013

FASB Independence and Fair Value Accounting

Article The AICPA strongly and unequivocally supports independence of the U.S. and international accounting standard setting bodies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in Norwalk, Connecticut, and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in London.
Published on April 03, 2013

Extraterritorial Private Rights of Action, also known as F-Cubed Litigation

Article The accounting profession believes private litigants may utilize U.S. securities laws within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. and that the United States Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd. is the correct reading of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Published on April 03, 2013

ERISA Fiduciary Definition - Appraisers of Employee Stock Ownership Plans

Article The AICPA believes that CPAs who perform valuation services for employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) should not be defined as fiduciaries under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Rather, the AICPA believes that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) should implement rules that would require appraisers of ESOPs to
Published on April 03, 2013

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Article This article outlines the AICPA's involvement with the development of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The AICPA was successful in winning recognition by House and Senate lawmakers of the vital role CPAs play in advising Americans on their financial decisions, thus preventing CPAs from reporting to a new regulatory body.
Published on April 03, 2013

Federal Legislative and Regulatory Issues

Federal Law This page highlights the advocacy issues in which the Congressional & Political Affairs Team is advocating on behalf of the profession, and also those issues that the team has recently followed.
Published on March 29, 2013

Tax Legislation and Policy - Recent Issues

Overview See current tax issues and legistlation that the AICPA recently followed. The Congressional and Political Affairs Team often assists the Tax Team with tax legislation and policy issues, and advocates about them to Members of Congress and other key policymakers on behalf of the profession.
Published on March 28, 2013

Audits of Federal Funds (Single Audits)

Article Entities that receive federal funds including states, local governments, and not-for-profit organizations (NPOs), are subject to audit requirements commonly referred to as “single audits” under the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended in 1996.  The Single Audit Act was enacted to standardize the requirements for auditing federal programs. 
Published on March 28, 2013

Page  1 2 3 4 5 >> 
Showing results 1 – 15 of 93
Show Results per page
Copyright © 2006-2013 American Institute of CPAs.